Date: March 17, 2010
Title: Why Do the Planets Stay in Orbit?
Podcaster: Stuart Clark
Description: Why do the planets stay in orbit? And why doesn’t the Moon fall out of the sky.
Bio: Dr Stuart Clark is an award-winning astronomy author and journalist. His books include The Sun Kings, and the highly illustrated Deep Space, and Galaxy. His next book is Big Questions: Universe, from which this podcast is adapted. Stuart is a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, a Visiting Fellow of the University of Hertfordshire, UK, and senior editor for space science at the European Space Agency. He is also a frequent contributor to newspapers, magazines, radio and television programmes. His website is www.stuartclark.com and his Twitter account is @DrStuClark.
Today’s sponsor: This episode of “365 Days of Astronomy” is sponsored by — no one. We still need sponsors for many days in 2010, so please consider sponsoring a day or two. Just click on the “Donate” button on the lower left side of this webpage, or contact us at email@example.com.
WHY DO THE PLANETS STAY IN ORBIT?
Hello I’m Dr Stuart Clark, astronomy author and journalist. Today I’d like to explore the question: Why do the planets stay in orbit?
Well, if the question is a simple one, the answer is anything but. Yet it led to the defining moment of science: the moment when natural philosophy was placed on its course to become modern science, with mathematics as its language.
The reason why the planets stay in orbit is contained within Isaac Newton’s theory of gravity; the central concept of which is ‘universal gravitation’, which states that everything with mass generates gravity: the Earth, the Moon, the Sun, all the planets and the moons, all the stars – everything. The amount of gravity generated is proportional to an object’s mass, and affects anything else nearby with mass; in other words, everything pulls everything else.
Newton’s Universal Gravitation was partly based upon the pioneering work of Johannes Kepler, who had mathematically described planetary motion several decades earlier.
Kepler’s first of three laws states that each planet moves in an elliptical orbit, with the Sun at one focus. The second law is that when the planet is far away from the Sun, it does not move as fast as when it is close to the Sun. This implied that whatever force was moving the planet weakened with distance. The third law follows on from the second, expressing as an equation the link between the size of the planet’s orbit and the time it takes to complete the orbit. But Kepler could not explain why the planets moved in this way.
Newton could. He visualized a cannon atop a tall tower, pointing horizontally and firing its projectile. Ignoring air resistance, the cannonball would zoom off parallel to the ground and the gravity of the Earth will immediately begin to pull it downwards, eventually dragging it to the floor. The greater the explosive charge, the faster the projectile will be ejected and the further it will travel before gravity pulls it down. Newton imagined sufficient explosive to eject the cannonball so fast that, by the time it started to fall, the curvature of the Earth resulted in the ground beneath dropping away and so the cannonball finds itself always at the same altitude above the ground. Without air resistance, the projectile would still be travelling at the same speed as when it left the cannon, and the whole situation starts again. Every time the cannonball drops a little, so the curvature of the Earth compensates, allowing the projectile to continue around the Earth forever; in effect, placing it in orbit.
This gives us the solution to the question of what stops the Moon crashing into the Earth. The Moon is falling towards us, but also travelling along so fast that it ‘overshoots’ the Earth and continues in a circular path.
Newtonian gravity changed the way astronomers thought about the night sky. No longer content to chart the positions of the stars as an aid to navigation, they could understand the motion of the celestial objects and predict future movements. The dates of future eclipses, the return of comets, the alignments of the planets – all were prescribed by Newton’s theory.
And it applied to a breathtaking range of other phenomena, too. It gave a way of estimating the mass of the planets and the Sun, and a means of explaining why the Earth and other planets bulged at their equators. It provided a method of calculating the movement of falling objects on Earth, and, importantly in the 17th century, of predicting the trajectory of projectiles fired from cannons.
The tides, so important to a sea-faring nation, could finally be explained as due to the gravitational attractions of the Moon and the Sun on the oceans. And Newton’s work showed that the same happens in reverse. Earth’s gravity deforms the Moon and because Earth more massive, the lunar tide is correspondingly larger, amounting to an elongation of the Moon by many metres. These changes to the spherical shapes of Earth and the Moon constantly sap their rotational energy. In the case of the Earth, the length of the day slowly but perceptibly increases and an extra second must be added occasionally to the midnight chimes at New Year. The slowing of the Moon’s rotation is more profound; over the billions of years since its formation, it has slowed so much that it now rotates just once every orbit, constantly presenting the same face to Earth.
Because of its huge size, Jupiter creates enormous tidal forces on its collection of moons. It transforms the innermost moon, Io into the most volcanically active place in the Solar System. Further out is the moon Europa, where the tidal force is less extreme and may provide the energy to keep a global ocean of liquid water under Europa’s icy crust. There may even be more water on Europa than there is on Earth.
Newton’s gravitational theory has allowed astronomers to find more than 400 planets orbiting other stars; they have not seen a single one of these planets, but their presence is certain because the stars are ‘wobbling’. Just as the star pulls the planet into an orbit, so the planet pulls back on the star and makes it wobble. The surprise is that instead of following slow pirouettes, like the one Jupiter induces in the Sun, most of the wobbling stars move quickly, indicating large planets in close orbits. As technology improves astronomers expect to find planetary systems more like ours.
Yet for all his success, nowhere did Newton explain the nature of gravity; he simply described it mathematically. Subsequent natural philosophers and scientists grappled with the fundamental origin of gravity, though none came close to a breakthrough. The world had to wait until the second decade of the 20th century to receive a mind-bending answer from Albert Einstein with his Theory of General Relativity.
End of podcast:
365 Days of Astronomy
The 365 Days of Astronomy Podcast is produced by the Astrosphere New Media Association. Audio post-production by Preston Gibson. Bandwidth donated by libsyn.com and wizzard media. Web design by Clockwork Active Media Systems. You may reproduce and distribute this audio for non-commercial purposes. Please consider supporting the podcast with a few dollars (or Euros!). Visit us on the web at 365DaysOfAstronomy.org or email us at info@365DaysOfAstronomy.org. Until tomorrow…goodbye.
I would like to point out that there has been at least one extrasolar planet directly imaged.
these podcasts are so interesting, see how the Almighty has put this universe together, and to think this universe is still growing. He made all of this out of nothing, what a master architech. He has put together such a beautiful creation. And to think there is still so much more to learn and discover.
Mary, the old man made nothing,thats what got the son in big trouble ,he was preaching that his old man made this plave and the universe.at that time they knew not what or how it worked. that was 2000 years ago. there was people in ireland 3000 years before this.so Mary you are going down a bad road, but i am sure you wont change , ha ha mike
How delicate is this equilibrium between a planet and the Sun? What would be the magnitude of force required to eject the planet from its hold by the central body? I am thinking of something like a massive explosion/outgassing happening on, say, Mercury’s sun-ward side – would that result in it being rocketed away towards Earth?
This universe is as a dream dreamt by so called supernatural power and we are the characters in this dream . there are a lot of things that curiously overtakes our mind but still we don’t have the logical and meaningful solutions.So this site has helped a lot for those seekers who are keenly interested in seeking such astronomical illusions………
Each of the nine planets stays in a fixed orbit around the sun due to its mass, orbit speed and distance from the sun. If any of these three factors were somehow altered the planets would either fly off into space or fall into the sun. So the question is: did the planets fall into their orbits by blind, mindless chance or were they placed there by an all-powerful, all-wise Creator? And here we’re talking about advanced mathematical formulas and the laws of physics. So which of the two thesis is the most logical and the most scientific?
With respect, the forces and properties required for planets to form and establish orbits are well known. There’s no reason to assume that solar systems and other celestial bodies do not form by themselves in accordance with well understood and observable physical processes. In addition, even if some unimaginably powerful being, supernatural or not, placed planets into orbits around stars that would offer no evidence that this being is either all powerful or all wise. If an ant attained sentience, it would undoubtedly consider the mental capacity and creations of an ordinary person, let alone Steven Hawking or William Shakespeare, completely unknowable but human beings are neither omnipotant nor omniscient simply because the ant might decide that it’s so. That being said, I’m all for cultivating an appreciation for the mysteries in life, I just don’t think it should be used to support beliefs, whatever they are, at the expense of knowledge, reason and understanding.
I am still in confusion. OK “Newton imagined sufficient explosive to eject the cannonball so fast that, by the time it started to fall, the curvature of the Earth resulted in the ground beneath dropping away and so the cannonball finds itself always at the same altitude above the ground.” We have three questions.
1. How can nature select the “sufficient explosive to eject the EARTH” to place the earth in that specific orbit. How our earth achieved the required orbital velocity so accurately so that it is still in orbit after millions of years.
2. The earth was a gas sphere initially. Why its half portion (near to the sun) did not go in the sun, and the remaining half in the outer space.
3. We have different formulas for gravitational fall proportional to m1*m2/r^2, and momentum uplift which is proportional to m1*v^2/r. Both can be in equilibrium. But these are in ‘unstable equilibrium’. That is a negligible reduction in sun’s mass will need the reduction in earth’s orbital velocity. Who will reduce the earth’s orbital velocity? Without reducing the orbital velocity of the earth, the value of ‘r’ will increase. It will further reduce the gravitational fall in comparison to the momentum uplift. And this will go on. The earth will move in spiral shape and go outside the solar system.