Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: So, I've got my scope

  1. #1
    It's here. I spent today working it out, then aligned the finder using terrestrial targets. Overall, I'm quite pleased. Seems Tasco have used the expertise they obtained when they aquired Celestron quite well. They sure needed it.

    The last five nights have been glorious. I've been seeing stars down to 6.4 (my record) near zenith using averted vision and I think I may have caught a glimpse of M33 on the same night. The night of April 4th. I even noted the Coma Berenices cluster on the same night. All this with no optical aid at all.

    I anticipated tonight with some excitement.
    "Verily, I shall smite thee mightily. Let there be cloud."
    Outside, now, it's 100% overcast. Satellite imaging from Meteosat doesn't raise my hopes. That front you see over eastern England moved over at about 3pm with only light wind.

    There seems to be not enough lunar radiation to clear the clouds, as we all know that clear skies can only happen around the time of the full moon...

    _________________
    "We want a few mad people now. See where the sane ones have landed us!" - George Bernard Shaw

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Hat Monster on 2002-04-09 15:49 ]</font>

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    621
    It is a well known fact that telescopes attract clouds and rain. If you put one person with a telescope per square kilometer in the Sahara, you would have a rain forest [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

    Rob

  3. #3
    Be sure to look at Jupiter and Saturn!
    When it first gets dark Saturn is near Alderberan and Jupiter is up high between Gemini and Orion.

    Clear Skys

  4. #4
    I already got 'em.
    Here's my record:
    <blockquote>
    10 April 8pm to 9:15pm
    Comditions
    Seeing: Fair to Reasonable
    In twilight.

    Venus: Scintillating like mad, just barely saw it's phase. Sky was still quite light. 4mm and 12.5mm. 12.5mm with 3x Barlow. Naked eye: Very bright.
    Saturn: Cassini division not shown well. Titan seen. 12.5mm with 3x Barlow. Naked eye: Bright.
    Jupiter: Easily seen, two dark bands, all four moons. Naked eye: Very bright.
    Mizar: Alcor in field, Mizar A and B easily resolved. 12.5mm. Naked eye: Bright star.
    Extras: Orion's belt all three stars, M45 attempted, failed due to cloud. Vega and Arcturus used for finder verification. Band of cloud moved in from west, was covering half the sky when we decided to give up.
    </blockquote>

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    677
    My first telescope was a large Tasco which I bought at the number one department store in my city at the time. It was not very good, actually, but who was I to know? The telescope seemed huge, and my husband and I fought over who could use it (practically all of the time). It was set up in our High Rise (Mies Van der Rohe) apartment. Venus turned out green! It was a beautiful green, so what the heck...

    I now own (in my old age) a Questar 3-1/2 in. (I like to think of it as 89 mm!) I have a Questar Tristand (as well as a tripod for it, purchased through Questar, which I no longer use). I have all of the Questar eyepieces and all of the Questar filters. Questars are great for planets. I use it around my apartment building. When I want deep-sky viewing, I look through the huge telescopes belonging to the guys in my wonderful astronomy club or through the very large club telescopes inside the observatory.

    I have also had Zeiss (10 x 40 mm) binoculars for years and a smaller pair of Bausch & Lomb binoculars for moon and stuff. So, I have a lot of stuff, plus a host of other astronomy toys.

    But that Tasco was a lot of fun, even if I did not know what a stupid purchase it actually was at the time.

    ljbrs [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img]

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    621
    My first telescope was a 60mm, think it was a Jason (wonder if they still exist?) Typical REAL cheap telescope, but it was wonderous to me.

    The mount was so unsteady, I rigged up a little brace out of erector set parts. Drilling a hole through the alt az mount, rigged up a little contraption that could adjust the altitude by turning a screw and hold it much steadier.

    Rob

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    3,015
    On 2002-04-11 20:32, ljbrs wrote:
    But that Tasco was a lot of fun, even if I did not know what a stupid purchase it actually was at the time.
    Not so stupid, then! And it brought you to this, how about that? I remember seeing the Questar ads in Scientific American thirty-five years ago, wondering how I'd be able to afford it. I still can't, I had to settle for a questar-wannabe, a Meade ETX. But it works great.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    387
    I still can't, I had to settle for a questar-wannabe, a Meade ETX. But it works great.
    Huh, Meade ETX, eh? I recently bought a Meade ETX (90) myself and I am quite pleased with it. Light, portable and I get to see crystal clear images using 25mm eyepiece. Not so great with 9mm eyepiece.

    I always wanted to have Maksutov-Cassegrain and for now this is all I can afford. Maybe some day I will upgrade my scope. I should try astrophotography with this scope.

    The only problem is that I live smack in the middle of a big city and too much light pollution [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_frown.gif[/img]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    3,015
    Have you seen Weasner's Mighty ETX site?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,808
    Seems Tasco have used the expertise they obtained when they aquired Celestron quite well. They sure needed it.
    Time out
    When did this happen? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]
    While I am (fairly) sure this is a good thing for Tasco, I am not at all sure that is a good thing for Celestron and their fans. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_evil.gif[/img]

  11. #11
    A couple years ago. So far the Celestron product line still has some high quality scopes.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    3,020
    On 2002-04-13 06:04, Kaptain K wrote:
    Time out
    When did this happen? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]
    While I am (fairly) sure this is a good thing for Tasco, I am not at all sure that is a good thing for Celestron and their fans. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_evil.gif[/img]
    June 98 apparently. It seems they decided not to meddle too much though:
    http://www.perkins-observatory.org/t...prezletter.txt

    My Tasco Binocs have stood me well over the years... apart from falling apart occasionally [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

  13. #13
    It showed Comet Ikeya-Zhang quite well at 72x last night (23:14BST), it was low in the North, right where the glow of nearby towns takes visual limiting magnitude down to 3/4. It was extremely difficult by eye, but looked like a defocussed globular in the scope. At lower magnification (45x) a very slight tail was apparent.

    One thing I've found about the scope. The finder is absolutely useless. Unless a star is in the centre of the field, it's blurred. Led to a LOT of swearing when I was hunting some deep sky objects, and especially that comet.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,808
    One thing I've found about the scope. The finder is absolutely useless.
    You have hit on my pet peeve about low to mid priced 'scopes. You can buy a pair of 7x50 binoculars with coated optics and fairly good performance for under $50. But, buy a 'scope for under $1000 (or more) and you get a cheesy "6x30" finder that is internally stopped down to around 20mm on a flimsy mount that is impossible to align. The finder on one 'scope I had (long ago) was so bad, that stars were actually fainter through the finder than they were naked eye. How are you supposed to "find" anything with that?

    So, any MFRs lurking about. Newbies to this hobby have enough to deal with without the hassle of trying to cope with an "unfinder". Spring for the few extra bucks and give us a real, usable finder on a sturdy adjustable mount. Is that too much to ask? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]

    _________________
    When all is said and done - sit down and shut up!

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Kaptain K on 2002-04-13 15:26 ]</font>

  15. #15
    You hit it on the head.
    The alignment is an oversized barrel and three screws. Stability is abysmal.
    It's 7x24, IIRC, and absolutely hopeless. The binocs I have, with chipped flamin' prisms, and only one side working blow it clean out of the water. And they're Tasco too, a 1987 model 16x50.

    Can this thing be replaced, is the mount any standard or can be replaced? A fscking riflescope can be had cheaply, would that fit?


  16. #16
    Wow, if it's that bad, put anything on instead.
    Yes, there are options although low-end manufacturers rarely build the bracket good enough to take a better finderscope.

    1 - Find a club or active amateur and see if they have a 6x30 (or better yet an 8x50) they replaced with something better. You'll probably need the bracket, too. People are always upgrading and have spare odds and ends. (Sorry, I already gave my medium quality one to a new guy.)

    2 - Buy a better one. Orion Telescope and Binocular has a nice variety that all work well. The 6x30 with right angle eyepiece (easier to look thru) are about $60 (with bracket and adapter plate).

    3 - Get a reflex finder like a Rigel Quickfinder or a TelRad (about $45 in USA). These project a set of circles on a glass plate and can be lined up with the scope. It works like a WWII gun sight. The circles are a known size and make finding objects in constellations super easy. Just about everyone here has one of these along with a finderscope.


    Clear Skys

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    180
    On 2002-04-13 22:03, JimB wrote:3 - Get a reflex finder like a Rigel Quickfinder or a TelRad (about $45 in USA). These project a set of circles on a glass plate and can be lined up with the scope. It works like a WWII gun sight. The circles are a known size and make finding objects in constellations super easy. Just about everyone here has one of these along with a finderscope.
    I second this.

    My Meade starfinder came with a POS 6x30 which I HAD to replace. I has had my doubts about how useful a 1x finder would be until I bought a telerad. These things are fantastic. Very acurate and quite easy to get used to (plus its right-side up to compare to star charts).

    Since I live in light polluted Houston and naked eye stars aren't always naked eye, I also bought an Anteres 8x50 right-angle (useful for newtonian style scopes) finder -- also right side up, and also a good purchase. I've looked through Meade's own 8x50 and was not impressed.


  18. #18
    Can the bracket be replaced too?
    No point in replacing the finder if I still have to deal with these damn three screws. Is there a better way?
    Pictures describe better.
    http://sushi.dbestern.net/forumstuff/finder1.jpg
    http://sushi.dbestern.net/forumstuff/finder2.jpg
    http://sushi.dbestern.net/forumstuff/finder3.jpg
    http://sushi.dbestern.net/forumstuff/finder4.jpg

  19. #19
    Sure, replace the bracket. I prefer the older style with 6 screws, I've had the O-ring three screw models drop the finderscope.

    Here's the Orion Tel & Bino I was describing:
    http://www.telescope.com/cgi-bin/Ori...duct/View/F564

    It's got only 2 screws and a spring-pin, but does work pretty well.

    Telrads and Rigels require no screws to install; you "stick" them on with double sided adhesive tape.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,575
    On 2002-04-09 15:37, Hat Monster wrote:
    It's here. I spent today working it out, then aligned the finder using terrestrial targets. Overall, I'm quite pleased.
    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Hat Monster on 2002-04-09 15:49 ]</font>
    So, Hat, you have your new scope. Is it a military secret what it is? Or are you deliberately teasing us?

    Please answer the following:

    1) Make:
    2) Model:
    3) Aperture:
    4) Focal Lgth:
    5) Mount:
    6) Eye pieces:
    7) Other goodies:

    I know I may have missed earlier posts because I have been away alot lately. I do not intend to be rude but...TELL ME WHAT YOU'VE GOT! [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

  21. #21
    Make: Tasco (but it shares much more in common with a Celestron than any previous Tasco model)
    Model: Luminova [insert stupidly big number here]
    Arpeture: 114mm (4.5in)
    Focal: 900mm
    Mount: Equatorial
    Eyepieces: 20mm, 12.5mm, 4mm
    Goodies: ****ty finder, 3x barlow, "moon filter", CD-ROM

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Hat Monster on 2002-04-15 10:14 ]</font>

  22. #22
    I have you all beat! Who needs a cassegrain when you have a 3 inch reflector...on a wooden tripod! woo!

    *looks around and leaves nervously*

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    180
    The best telescope in the world is one that you actually use - whether it be your eyes, binoculars, dobsonian or Keck.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,575
    On 2002-04-15 10:11, Hat Monster wrote:
    Make: Tasco (but it shares much more in common with a Celestron than any previous Tasco model)
    Model: Luminova [insert stupidly big number here]
    Arpeture: 114mm (4.5in)
    Focal: 900mm
    Mount: Equatorial
    Eyepieces: 20mm, 12.5mm, 4mm
    Goodies: ****ty finder, 3x barlow, "moon filter", CD-ROM
    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Hat Monster on 2002-04-15 10:14 ]</font>
    Thank you for the response. Sounds like you have a beautiful instrument that will bring you years of enjoyment. Do not ever buy another scope without telling us all about it. I don't want to have to warn you again. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]

    A warning to others...If you buy a scope you are required to tell us about your new baby...or else! The penalty will be 30 lashes with a wet, five day old, riggatoni. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_lol.gif[/img]

    _________________
    Lighten up! I'm here for the fun of it.

    (edit to correct typo)

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Russ on 2002-04-17 20:36 ]</font>

Similar Threads

  1. How best to use my old scope
    By CJSF in forum Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2009-Apr-07, 06:07 PM
  2. Problem matching main scope & finder scope
    By phkhgh in forum Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2008-Apr-09, 03:22 AM
  3. pic of new scope
    By ozzmosis in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 2006-Mar-07, 03:49 PM
  4. Hi all. New Guy, New Scope
    By Yamaha04R1 in forum Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2006-Feb-28, 07:57 PM
  5. Your First Scope! What's Next?
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-10, 09:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
here
The forum is sponsored in-part by: