Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Antimatter signature detected in lightning

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    8,831

    Antimatter signature detected in lightning

    On Wired Magazine.

    During two recent lightning storms, Fermi recorded gamma-ray emissions of a particular energy that could only have been produced by the decay of energetic positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. The observations are the first of their kind for lightning storms.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Metrowest, Boston
    Posts
    4,071
    Argos. Nice find. Not too surprising, considering the energies involved. The big surprise to me was the discovery that peeling scoth tape off a surface in vacuum produced x- rays. You never know who will find interesting "stuff".

    see:http://www.bautforum.com/universe-to...ns-comets.html
    Last edited by trinitree88; 2009-Nov-07 at 03:33 PM. Reason: link

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9,761
    First reported 38 years ago.
    You'll need a subscription to view the full text, but here is a subsequent letter to Nature, confirming that Ashby and Whitehead reported the characteristic 0.511 MeV gammas from positron/electron annihilation.

    Are we seeing the Schwinger Effect, with an intense electric field generating electrons and positrons de novo? Or some kind of informal particle accelerator in action?

    Grant Hutchison

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,654
    great.. now people are going to be even more afraid of lightning storms than they already are.. it creates antimatter, which we all know will destroy us all..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315
    But it also liberates nitrogen which feeds the plants which make our food...

  6. #6
    Antimatter Plants? ooer
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,201
    Quote Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
    great.. now people are going to be even more afraid of lightning storms than they already are.. it creates antimatter, which we all know will destroy us all..
    Well, since anti-matter is produced by natural processes it must be a good thing. I'm sure we'll see somebody marketing all-natural anti-sugar which will make you lose weight. Instant spectacular results!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315
    Quote Originally Posted by swampyankee View Post
    Well, since anti-matter is produced by natural processes it must be a good thing. I'm sure we'll see somebody marketing all-natural anti-sugar which will make you lose weight. Instant spectacular results!
    Chiral sugar produces spectacular results, all right, but not the kind you'd want to call home about...

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by swampyankee View Post
    Well, since anti-matter is produced by natural processes it must be a good thing. I'm sure we'll see somebody marketing all-natural anti-sugar which will make you lose weight. Instant spectacular results!
    I've already got the advertising slogan:

    Try Anti-Sugar (r). Prepare to be blown away!
    As above, so below

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,151
    If only we could find a way to harness this energy, channel it, into the flux capacitor...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    2,968
    This has some facinating implications. I'm curious now if a large enough Tesla coil , or other artifical lightning apperatus, might exihibt the same M/aM signature...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,201
    Quote Originally Posted by dgavin View Post
    This has some facinating implications. I'm curious now if a large enough Tesla coil , or other artifical lightning apperatus, might exihibt the same M/aM signature...
    There are some pretty large facilities for testing the behavior of things, like aircraft, when struck by lightning. It should be an easy enough thing to check. Of course, these facilities are only capable of energies at least an order of magnitude below a typical lightning strike, so a negative result would just mean it's time to build a bigger facility.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,250

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    2,292
    Here's my antisugar slogan:

    Eliminates that extra mass and gives you plenty of energy, without dieting !

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by dgavin View Post
    This has some facinating implications. I'm curious now if a large enough Tesla coil , or other artifical lightning apperatus, might exihibt the same M/aM signature...
    This could be a fun experiment...

    I design Lightning protection systems, which are basically a fillial with a charge coupled plate - this attracts the lightning by producing an upleader. The fillial is then connected to a down conductor, and the down conductor is connected to a large earthing system. (Lightning Protection International)

    So we insert the Huge Tesla Coil at the bottom of the down conductor, and try to collect the energy.... (mad scientist laugh... )

    It's alive...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    8,831
    Quote Originally Posted by grant hutchison View Post
    Are we seeing the Schwinger Effect, with an intense electric field generating electrons and positrons de novo?
    Wouldn´t the energy signature be different in that case?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9,761
    Quote Originally Posted by Argos View Post
    Wouldn´t the energy signature be different in that case?
    Still the same gammas when they annihilate. No?

    Grant Hutchison

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    8,831
    Quote Originally Posted by grant hutchison View Post
    Still the same gammas when they annihilate. No?
    Seems like a reverse process.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9,761
    Quote Originally Posted by Argos View Post
    Seems like a reverse process.
    Schwinger just provides a source for the positrons. Thereafter, those positrons will encounter electrons (either the ones they were pair-produced with, or others) and annihilate. That will produce the same 0.511 MeV gammas as any other electron/positron annihilation.

    Grant Hutchison

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    8,831
    Hmm, yes. Thanks.

Similar Threads

  1. Regarding my Signature
    By a1call in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2010-Oct-25, 01:47 PM
  2. Lightning Detected on Mars
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2009-Jun-19, 12:34 AM
  3. Has the signature of Planet X been detected?
    By timb in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 2008-Dec-25, 07:46 PM
  4. Signature
    By William_Thompson in forum Forum Introductions and Feedback
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2005-Nov-05, 07:06 AM
  5. My Signature
    By StarLab in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 2005-May-25, 02:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •