Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Kinetic energy of a wave question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    562

    Kinetic energy of a wave question

    E = hv and also 0.5mv**2

    For EM radiation

    E = hv and also 0.5mc**2

    Does light have mass? If not what is it?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    6,762
    light has no mass, but it has momentum
    All comments made in red are moderator comments. Please, read the rules of the forum here and read the additional rules for ATM, and for conspiracy theories. If you think a post is inappropriate, don't comment on it in thread but report it using the /!\ button in the lower left corner of each message. But most of all, have fun!

    Bi-weekly space physics research "blog" at tusenfem.blogspot.co.at

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    562
    Quote Originally Posted by tusenfem View Post
    light has no mass, but it has momentum
    P = mv

    P = 0 x v

    = 0

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315
    No...

    momentum p = E/c = hf/c = h/lambda, where h is Planck's constant, f is the frequency, and c is, well, c! (speed of light). From: E=hf (Max Planck's black-body radiation equation).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    6,762
    Quote Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
    No...

    momentum p = E/c = hf/c = h/lambda, where h is Planck's constant, f is the frequency, and c is, well, c! (speed of light). From: E=hf (Max Planck's black-body radiation equation).
    My bold, which comes from the full equation for energy:

    E2 = p2c2 + m02c4, which can be derived somehow. Look it up in a basic physics book to get to know the somehow.
    All comments made in red are moderator comments. Please, read the rules of the forum here and read the additional rules for ATM, and for conspiracy theories. If you think a post is inappropriate, don't comment on it in thread but report it using the /!\ button in the lower left corner of each message. But most of all, have fun!

    Bi-weekly space physics research "blog" at tusenfem.blogspot.co.at

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315
    Quote Originally Posted by tusenfem View Post
    My bold, which comes from the full equation for energy.
    I was disagreeing with you, tusenfem. I was disagreeing with the Newtonian equation for momentum being applied to relativistic velocities.

    Oops! I meant, I "wasn't" disagreeing..." Sorry!
    Last edited by mugaliens; 2009-Oct-07 at 09:34 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    6,762
    Quote Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
    I was disagreeing with you, tusenfem. I was disagreeing with the Newtonian equation for momentum being applied to relativistic velocities.
    Well, yeah, relativistic is not Newtonian.
    Newtonian momentum: m v
    Relativistic momentum: m v = γ m0 v

    Relativistic total energy: E2 = p2c2 + m02c4
    As a photon has no m0 this reduces to: E2 = p2c2
    As the energy of a photon is: E = h ν (which is btw not "Max Planck's black-body radiation equation")
    One can get the momentum of a photon by: p = E/c = h ν / c

    Methinks you were disagreeing with rodin.
    All comments made in red are moderator comments. Please, read the rules of the forum here and read the additional rules for ATM, and for conspiracy theories. If you think a post is inappropriate, don't comment on it in thread but report it using the /!\ button in the lower left corner of each message. But most of all, have fun!

    Bi-weekly space physics research "blog" at tusenfem.blogspot.co.at

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315
    Quote Originally Posted by tusenfem View Post
    Methinks you were disagreeing with rodin.
    Yes.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    4,579
    Quote Originally Posted by tusenfem
    Relativistic momentum: m v = γ m0 v
    And note that there's a good reason why you can't just use the relativistic formula p = γ m0 v for a photon. It's true that m0 is 0, which would lead you to think that the momentum must be zero, but gamma is infinite, which means the value of this expression is indeterminate.
    Conserve energy. Commute with the Hamiltonian.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Grey View Post
    ...which means the value of this expression is indeterminate.
    Exactly. Fortunately, Planck's equation is determinate.

Similar Threads

  1. Kinetic Energy Question
    By Philippe Lemay in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2009-Nov-06, 12:54 PM
  2. Potential And Kinetic Energy
    By czeslaw in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2006-Aug-07, 09:49 AM
  3. A question about Kinetic Energy and Mass to Heat Conversion.
    By BigDon in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2006-Jul-11, 10:19 PM
  4. Relativity and Kinetic Energy
    By uniqueuponhim in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2006-Mar-14, 11:22 PM
  5. Question or rather clarification about Kinetic energy
    By skrap1r0n in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2005-Jun-26, 01:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •