Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 44 of 44

Thread: NASA fixing photos again?

  1. #31
    Thank you all for the welcome!


    At the end of the day, I was trying to prove one point and that is that one cannot assume that there is funny business going on based on photographs alone. kucharek is right, different scanners different results

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    3,359
    Zeek64, I want to add my welcome to this board too.

  3. #33
    Trodas - when are you going to answer the questions posed to you in the other threads you have started. You made a claim, people have responded. You now have a responsibility to read and respond in return.

  4. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by djellison View Post
    Trodas - when are you going to answer the questions posed to you in the other threads you have started. You made a claim, people have responded. You now have a responsibility to read and respond in return.
    Something tells me we are going to be waiting for quite a while.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    35,244
    Quote Originally Posted by djellison View Post
    Trodas - when are you going to answer the questions posed to you in the other threads you have started. You made a claim, people have responded. You now have a responsibility to read and respond in return.
    Trodas is taking a little involuntary timeout for not answering questions. That suspension lifts in a couple of hours. We'll see if and when he returns after that. If he doesn't start answering questions, he will be suspended again.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    618
    Quote Originally Posted by Trystero View Post
    I couldn't help noticing the watch he's wearing.

    What time zones are on the the moon, anyway?


    tbm

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Peters Creek, Alaska
    Posts
    7,035
    That's an Omega Speedmaster. If you're seeing extra hands, they're for the chronograph functions, not multiple time zones.
    ─────────────────────────────────────────────
    My moderation comments will appear in this color.
    To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the lower-left corner of the post:
    ─────────────────────────────────────────────
    Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    6,275
    The time zone on the Moon changes about once an hour (give or take an hour or so every four weeks).

    Yes, I'm kidding. I would imagine (without any actual knowledge) that the watches were set to Houston time, i.e. either CST or CDT depending on the time of year of the mission.

    They were primarily used to determine EVA elapsed time, of course.

  9. #39
    Here are links to the specifications for the Biogon 60mm F/5.6 lens manufactured by Zeiss. Page 2 has a graph which shows the light fall-off curves at the maximum F/5.6 aperture and at F/8. It is the Relative Illuminance graph. Note that the light fall-off is pretty bad at F/5.6 such that the exposure value near the corners of the frame is 1 F/stop darker than at the center of the frame. Light fall-off is common with camera lenses and in particular for wide angle lenses such as the Biogon.

    Biogon 60mm page 1

    Biogon 60mm page 2

    To make trodas happy, following are some 5903 photos which I processed from ISD's scan of their original negative. The full resolution versions of the following are on my web site. The following photos are my medium resolution photo versions:

    ISD original 5903 scan which I have color corrected to restore the correct color balance

    The above photo, cropped, Biogon lens vignetting removed

    My aesthetically pleasing enhanced version of the above photo

    The original photo with lognormal curves applied, proving that the only light sources were the sun, the lunar surface, and reflections off of the gold Mylar covering the LM descent stage. Note that for this photo, I did not use the photo version where I had removed the Biogon lense's vignetting since conspiracy nuts would demand that I use the original photo to prove where the light sources are (or are not).

  10. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie B. View Post
    The time zone on the Moon changes about once an hour (give or take an hour or so every four weeks).

    Yes, I'm kidding. I would imagine (without any actual knowledge) that the watches were set to Houston time, i.e. either CST or CDT depending on the time of year of the mission.

    They were primarily used to determine EVA elapsed time, of course.
    If I'm not mistaken they didn't really use any time zone per se, but used mission elapsed time. In other words, event X would occur seven hours, minutes 43 seconds after launch, which is to say 7:09:43 MET.

    There are plenty of people here more knowledgeable than I, so I welcome correction.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    6,275
    Quote Originally Posted by FramerDave View Post
    If I'm not mistaken they didn't really use any time zone per se, but used mission elapsed time. In other words, event X would occur seven hours, minutes 43 seconds after launch, which is to say 7:09:43 MET.

    There are plenty of people here more knowledgeable than I, so I welcome correction.
    Must have been an interesting modification to those Omegas, then, to show MET...

    *imagines all three astronauts fiddling with the setting knobs on thier watches at the moment of liftoff*

  12. #42
    "Houston, my watch stopped, can we start the liftoff over?"

  13. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by tbm View Post
    I couldn't help noticing the watch he's wearing.

    What time zones are on the the moon, anyway?


    tbm
    Aldrin's watch, at the moment photo 5903 was taken read 11:14 PM CDT. His watch was set to Houston CDT. Thus the photo was taken at 04:14 AM UT on July 21, 1969. NASA, according to the lunar surface journal, thinks that the photo probably was taken at 04:18 UT. Guess they didn't look too closely at his watch in the photo. Here is a link to my own processed version of the original 5903 photo. It is a big image:

    GoneToPlaid's processed version of AS11-40-5903

    He He. There are no time zones on the moon since nobody lives there.

  14. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by FramerDave View Post
    There are plenty of people here more knowledgeable than I, so I welcome correction.
    Well, as I said...

Similar Threads

  1. UFOs on NASA Official Photos. STS 88
    By vasotech in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2011-Jul-20, 09:08 PM
  2. Where are the recent NASA photos of the oil spill?
    By Ong in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2010-Jun-23, 01:48 AM
  3. NASA Faking Mars Photos Too!!!!!
    By jrkeller in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2004-Jun-15, 05:10 AM
  4. NASA now faking Earth photos too!!!!!
    By jrkeller in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2003-Jun-27, 08:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •