Neutrinos have mass. AND they travel at c.
HOW????
Rob
Neutrinos have mass. AND they travel at c.
HOW????
Rob
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?
The Leif Ericson Cruiser
They were thought to travel at c when they were thought to be massless. Now that they're thought to have mass, it's assumed they travel at a little less than c.
Grant Hutchison
... definitely not FTLSo now I find out matter CAN go FTL!
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino#Speed
Definitely NOT faster than light.
How could anyone ever have thought that a particle of matter, a sibling to electrons, taus, and muons, could have been massless? Masslessness would have made it something else completely different from matter, something that didn't fit in with electrons and such!
If we don't limit ourselves to the vacuum, FTL is possible.
See Cerenkov radiation. Make note it's not true FTL, since c does not decrease as it's defined as 'in vacuo'.
Speed is not the major problem in neutrino investigations. The big problem is the ability of the neutrino to pass through matter -- detectors and even the entire Earth -- with little chance of being detected. Having no electrical charge (in addition to being small and fast) makes them very hard to detect.
Just so people know, robross ran into one of those quirks with allowed words in titles and did ask for it to be changed, but mods ran into the same issue.So now I find out matter CAN go FTL!
My original *thread* title was written hastily. It was "So now I find out matter CAN travel FTL" when I really had meant "c", not FTL. I was not able to change the thread title after I saved it, I could only change the title of my first *post*. I asked the mods to change the thread title, but they were unable to change "FTL" to "light speed", but they discovered that changing "FTL" to "c" did work.
Why "light speed" is not allowed in a thread title, I have no idea, you'll have to ask the board admins.
Rob
Why would "light speed" not work?
Light 'slows down' when going through 'stuff'.
It can get through glass faster than a diamond. It goes through empty space faster than air. Light speed is a catch-all term for many different things.
C only has 1 value, the speed of light in empty, and flat, space.
But back to the original topic...
So by our current understanding of matter and energy, either neutrinos have mass and travel less than c, or they have no mass and can travel at c.
However, experiments measuring both mass and velocity of neutrinos have determined both that they have mass, and travel at c (within the error margin of the measurement). However, the speed measurement *could* be wrong, and they end up not traveling at c.
But, if they do move at c, and they have mass, this would certainly represent a rule-breaking particle!
Rob
Well, experiments show that they have masses very close to zero, and velocities very close to c: the error margins are small, but accommodate non-zero mass and sub-c velocity.
Theory, meanwhile, requires them to have non-zero mass in order to explain their observed flavour oscillation, and that in turn requires them to have sub-c velocity. So it seems that we probably just need tighter measurements of both mass and velocity, so that we can distinguish between "close to" and "equal to".
Grant Hutchison
My understanding was that we theororize that they have mass because they can change between thier 3 states.
Although; this might be older information, so maybe there are actually mass measurements since I heard it this way. And; I only heard it on PBS (I think it was Nova: ghost particle)
By the original measurements for the neutrino's speed (by viewing the interactions of neutrinos that were created from decayed pions), that known to be repeated using MINONS detectors, we only know that there is only a very high uncertainty that the neutrinos don't travel at FTL, or at c' according to Rob's resent post changes, also, in measurements for the speed of neutrinos from a supernova, the detected results indicated that those neutrinos were travlling at c'.
For now at least, the neutrino's mass is undefined, and can not be measured by its speed.
----
If I repeated a previous post, I apologize.
Last edited by chi22; 2009-May-18 at 08:54 PM.