Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 324

Thread: Over-Moderation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,628

    Over-Moderation

    I can't post this in the appropriate forum, but I want to call attention to Swift's actions here

    http://www.bautforum.com/forum-rules...rs-log-14.html


    I already thought this board was overmoderated, now I'm 100% convinced. Someone please take away Swift's power.

    The guy in question, who I've never met nor care about, was being polite as could be IMO. I watch the banned/suspended poster's log for abuses such as this. Why has it gone so far as to ban someone who hasn't even broken the rules?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,628
    in case it's deleted

    Originally Posted by mmfiore
    Hey you are the moderator if you don't like that I put up a fight shut down the thread. But in doing so you admit that your ego just does not like to be challenged and your way of handling it is to silence the opposition. Do as you will.
    Originally Posted by Swift
    Tusenfem is in this thread as a participant. And what they posted is perfectly acceptable. I, on the other hand, am here to moderate, and that kind of attitude is not acceptable around here. Please take the next 24 hours to read the rules and to particularly become familiar with what is expected of advocates of ATM ideas, such as answering questions put to them. And if you believe there are problems with other members' posts, such as they are being rude, do not debate it in thread, but use the red report triangle.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,628
    we ask people to defend their ATM ideas and ban them when the don't answer the questions - now we ban them when they do answer the questions. This is ridiculous.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    18,990
    Concerning Swift, he acted after there had been some discussion of mmfiore's behavior. It is our hope that mmfiore will read the rules, and follow local customs here. He/she seems like they will be an asset to the community. The one day suspension is not a ban.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,211
    Quote Originally Posted by antoniseb View Post
    Concerning Swift, he acted after there had been some discussion of mmfiore's behavior. It is our hope that mmfiore will read the rules, and follow local customs here. He/she seems like they will be an asset to the community. The one day suspension is not a ban.

    But it does take one day; out of his 30, for proposing his UFT over there in ATM.
    Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr

    Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit

    Hint: this is at heart a scientific forum, and underneath the fooling around there are some diamond-hard minds hanging about, ready to tear you to shreads. -- Mike Alexander

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    6,768
    Dear crosscountry why would ANYTHING be deleted? Do you think we have something to hide? I would be highly insulted if my message, mmfiore's or swift's message would be deleted and quit the board.

    mmfiore got rather agitated by my message to him where I state (as a participant, not as moderator, because then it would be in red and I tend not to moderete threads in which I am a participant however small) that after 8 pages of thread, he has not shown anything about his Super relativity idea that is in any way convincing that it has any merit. Fortis is mainly on this. Instead of replying to my complaints, he feels attacked by me mentioning that I do not see any reason for that whole thread.

    Maybe I should not have mentioned that?
    Maybe mmfiore feels that I am right but does not want it true.

    Anyway, I still feel the same.

    Quote Originally Posted by crosscountry
    we ask people to defend their ATM ideas and ban them when the don't answer the questions - now we ban them when they do answer the questions. This is ridiculous.
    We only ban/suspend people when they do not answer direct questions. An answer "i do not know" is a valid answer. mmfiore was not banned because he "answered the question" but because his behaviour, for which he has been warned before.
    here (before I was a participant)
    here
    here
    And that is only in this thread.
    And then we apparently let this message just pass by.

    And whether mmfiore really answers the question is a matter of debate, it took several tries by Fortis to get mmfiore to acknowledge that he cannot "predict" masses of particles if he cannot use the mass of said particle as an input parameter!!

    So, over-moderation? I don't think so.
    All comments made in red are moderator comments. Please, read the rules of the forum here and read the additional rules for ATM, and for conspiracy theories. If you think a post is inappropriate, don't comment on it in thread but report it using the /!\ button in the lower left corner of each message. But most of all, have fun!

    Bi-weekly space physics research "blog" at tusenfem.blogspot.co.at

  7. #7
    Please stop the flagrant under-moderation.

    Thank you.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,710
    So, wait. I went back and read that when the suspension was instituted. Someone was really rude, and they got suspended for it. What's the problem here?
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  9. #9
    I have (until now) refrained from joining this board because of the police-state atmosphere about it. I have seen many instances of moderation so heavy handed I had difficulty believing my eyes. This is not one of those instances.

  10. #10
    BTW, remember that had this been a police state, crosscountry probably wouldn't have dared post that critique.

    I know several boards where he'd have been banned and the thread deleted without trace or comment.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,628
    I admit not knowing the full story, but going on what evidence was presented, I saw the allegation as trumped up at best.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    28
    The YouTube experience has tought me to (generally) appreciate at least some policing/community-guidline-enforcing as a service (not specifically speaking about the local habits).
    With a scientific site you must expect to draw a public with low latent inhibition (and some inclination for the empiric method) that might be given to test the waters and possibly limits - so there better be some!
    (out of principle (and probably owing to our European upbringing) we are against the capital punishment)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,018
    I don't see why the moderation here is reminiscent of a police state any more than many science journals' policy of not running any submissions that don't meet certain academic and etiquette standards is.

    An internet (or print) forum and a government are very, very, very, very, very different contexts.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,710
    It's hard for me to take accusations of this being a police state seriously given that I just received mail from an admin in which he called himself a dork.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    9,268
    Right Gillian - banned for revealing information from a private communication!

    (No, that mail wasn't from me, but yes, I am also a dork (according to my daughter - and I trust her opinion)).
    Get up, a get-get, get down.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    13,988
    Heh. Over-moderation. The old BABB's policy was one warning for any rules violation (except for the "hanging" offenses like spamming or socks.) No suspensions, no second warnings. One warning only.

    You could be sure that regular BABBers (the surviving ones, anyway) had polished their manners to a _very_ fine gleam.

    I miss that sometimes.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,445
    I have to say that I dont find BAUT to be over-policed. I see too many places where insults and flame wars are the SOP, so I like a place where some decorum is enforced. mmfiore got a bit rude and got a day off. No biggy.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,628
    Sure, I agree completely that "some decorum is enforced" is nice, but there is a point where it's no longer nice and starts to be over done. I wasn't the one that said police state, and I never implied that.

    Moose, I don't see where mmfiore broke any rules, and I didn't even read what he read as rude.

  19. #19
    Hey you are the moderator if you don't like that I put up a fight shut down the thread. But in doing so you admit that your ego just does not like to be challenged and your way of handling it is to silence the opposition. Do as you will.
    You don't see that as rude?
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    11,219
    I don't see that as rude if he believed what he was saying. If it were
    true, his comments would be justified, and being suspended for stating
    an important, relevant truth is strong supporting evidence that he was
    right. If he didn't believe what he was saying, then it was much worse
    than rude, and he doesn't belong here.

    -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
    http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

  21. #21
    There is also the fact that he should have reported rather than commenting in the thread. It all goes to establish a pattern. 24 hours to think about the rules isn't 'over moderation' in my opinion.

    People aren't suspended on a whim by a lone moderator, there is always discussion and past behaviour and posting is taken into consideration. (as we always stress in these type of threads)
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    9,268
    Further, the actions of a moderator have been undone in the past, if (for example) discussion shows they might have been too harsh.

    This has always been taken well by whichever moderator had his or her action altered.

    ---

    That post "your way of handling it is to silence the opposition" is just so way off it's almost like the post was about a different forum and was posted here by accident.
    Get up, a get-get, get down.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,628
    Quote Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
    You don't see that as rude?
    not in the slightest. I found his tone quite even and emotionless, rational.


    You'll have to go back and read more (as I do) to get the full discussion.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,430
    Over-moderation? I don't think so. Unless, of course, you compare BAUT to the sites where name calling (and much, much worse) is common-place. I see BAUT as an oasis of sanity and proper behavior, surrounded by the sewer that is most of the internet. BAUT is a place where children can post and see adults conversing, yes, even arguing, in a civil manner. BAUT definitely is the 10% defined by Sturgeon's Law.

    When warning or suspending someone, do I think the moderators are correct every time? No. Most of the time? Yes. I have reported moderators when I thought they were wrong -- but I've done it using the proper method defined by the rules: the small report triangle.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,628
    Quote Originally Posted by Tucson_Tim View Post
    When warning or suspending someone, do I think the moderators are correct every time? No. Most of the time? Yes. I have reported moderators when I thought they were wrong -- but I've done it using the proper method defined by the rules: the small report triangle.
    I guess I should look that up and try that next time.

  26. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by crosscountry View Post
    I guess I should look that up and try that next time.
    How's this more public method working out for you?

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,451
    All you need to do is be polite and never let yourself get provoked.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,710
    I read the context, too; I thought it was rude, and I thought at least one more post following it was rude. I also happen to know, based on what people have said, that some people don't bother reading the rules and then get upset when they get suspended for a violation. Isn't that rude, too?
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  29. #29
    Hello YourImaginaryFriend, pleased to meet you. I'd introduce myself, but I don't think you will be here for very long.

  30. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by J Chrysostom View Post
    Hello YourImaginaryFriend, pleased to meet you. I'd introduce myself, but I don't think you will be here for very long.
    And, poof, YourImaginaryFriend disappears, along with all bawdy comments made.

    That's why it's better to just report such via the red triangle icon instead of attempting to interact.

Similar Threads

  1. Over moderation
    By tommac in forum Forum Introductions and Feedback
    Replies: 495
    Last Post: 2012-Mar-18, 02:51 AM
  2. Quality of moderation - ATM/CT
    By kamaz in forum Forum Introductions and Feedback
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2010-Nov-29, 05:57 PM
  3. ATM moderation...
    By gzhpcu in forum Forum Introductions and Feedback
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2010-Apr-23, 04:47 PM
  4. Self moderation of ATM
    By aastrotech in forum Forum Introductions and Feedback
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 2009-Aug-27, 07:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •