Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 81

Thread: Realistic sci-fi

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
    well, maybe not in Soviet science fiction- if there was such a thing- then it's the evil aliens that would have the evil All American characteristics that are overcome by their obviously superior way of life..
    Soviet science fiction tended towards much more cerebral lines, the first Solaris is a good example, as it Tarkovski's Stalker.

    They tended to have an awareness of political systems and people's place within them that was almost completely absent in American SF of the time, as well as a whimsical sense of humor that lead to such nice questions as "Right, who told the computer that sheep has five legs?"

    They where almost entirely devoid of evil aliens.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    13,886
    I remember reading a short essay many years ago (maybe the Strugatskys?) speculating that the lack of evil aliens in Soviet SF was the ideological notion that all advanced civilizations would of course all be communist, and therefore would get along just fine with each other.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,188
    Quote Originally Posted by HenrikOlsen View Post
    Soviet science fiction tended towards much more cerebral lines, the first Solaris is a good example,...
    They where almost entirely devoid of evil aliens.
    The alien, uh, thing, that inhabited Solaris wasn't unequivocally evil but it certainly wasn't friendly either.

  4. #34
    No, the humans where the evil alien invaders in that one
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    location
    Posts
    10,092
    Quote Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
    it wouldn't be much fun to watch a totally realistic sci fi movie- especially one set in deep space.
    the most action we'd see would be a short engine burn to make a minor change in trajectory, followed by a couple of hours of people floating around and looking out the window at an endless see of unchanging stars. every once in a while they'd get a radio transmission responding to a transmission they made a year earlier...
    That depends on how you define "science fiction": is it whiz-bang technology or can it be fiction that is merely set in a future based on technology more advanced than ours. After all, deep space vessels can be science fiction while being completely realistic. If we have a worldship in deep space there are all sorts of regular drama that can take place, many of which might merely be "soap opera in a different setting" but might also be more like real science fiction concepts with technology and utopic and dystopic features.
    Et tu BAUT? Quantum mutatus ab illo.

  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by mike alexander View Post
    I remember reading a short essay many years ago (maybe the Strugatskys?) speculating that the lack of evil aliens in Soviet SF was the ideological notion that all advanced civilizations would of course all be communist, and therefore would get along just fine with each other.
    Just like the way the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China got along?

    Nick

  7. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Theodorakis View Post
    Just like the way the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China got along?

    Nick
    You can't just go ruining a perfectly good ideology with your concepts of "reality".

    These things just work, you know

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Theodorakis View Post
    Just like the way the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China got along?

    Nick
    [One country] the [other county] are not "true" communists!

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    7,307

    Arrow

    Quote Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
    well, maybe not in Soviet science fiction- if there was such a thing- then it's the evil aliens that would have the evil All American characteristics that are overcome by their obviously superior way of life..
    Much of the best Eastern Block science fiction is said to contain veiled parodies of the communist ideology. Westerners typically miss this; we lack the cultural clues.

    Some even claim that the element of parody was the sole value of science fiction in the Eastern Block, although I disagree. In the west, curiously, skepticism of capitalism in science fiction seems to have been much rarer, exceptions such as Pohl and Kornbluth's The Space Merchants notwithstanding. And of course western science fiction writers did not need to hide their criticism behind allegories and images, since the western intelligentsia was always more insensitive to literature than their eastern counterparts.
    Last edited by Disinfo Agent; 2009-Apr-04 at 07:27 PM.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Posts
    7,496
    Quote Originally Posted by Disinfo Agent View Post
    In the west, curiously, skepticism of capitalism in science fiction seems to have been much rarer, exceptions such as Pohl and Kornbluth's The Space Merchants notwithstanding.
    And "Star Trek."

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    location
    Posts
    10,092
    Quote Originally Posted by SeanF View Post
    And "Star Trek."
    Oh, I dunno about that. Mudd and the Ferengi are traders, not capitalists. Or did I miss that law of acquisition that referred to Credit Default Swaps? :-/
    Et tu BAUT? Quantum mutatus ab illo.

  12. #42
    They're also considered to be villains, or at the very least comedy relief, in the series, compared to the More Enlightened (TM) principles of Our Heroes.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    9,183
    Quote Originally Posted by SeanF View Post
    And "Star Trek."
    I gather that the Star Trek writers simply didn't understand the role of money.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,793
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Beardsley View Post
    I gather that the Star Trek writers simply didn't understand the role of money.
    I dunno, how many squillions did they make?

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    9,183
    Quote Originally Posted by JonClarke View Post
    I dunno, how many squillions did they make?
    Yeah, but they probably inhale and exhale squillions of molecules of air, but that doesn't mean they understand the role of oxygen, nitrogen and so on.

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    478
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Beardsley View Post
    I gather that the Star Trek writers simply didn't understand the role of money.
    No, it is that Gene Roddenberry didn't like the idea of money or capitalism. That's why the Next Gen hemorrhaged writers for the first few years. No money, no disagreements between Star Fleet personnel, ect.. If you ever get a chance to listen to stories of the writers from the first few seasons, they're real interesting.

    David.

  17. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,545
    The first two Terminator films are excellent. I'm not a fan of dumb action movies; James Cameron's are either smart, funny, or both. He's got a new one coming out in Dec., and it's SF. Boo-ya!

    There's Timeline. Unless you like realistic medieval combat in a terrible movie, it may not be for you.

  18. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Depew, NY
    Posts
    4,800
    I throw this out there for the 2.6 seconds of science concern (not content) - The 6th Day. Cloning issues, disease, technological acceptance in general and the fun idea of "re-pet". I think they tried very hard to have some serious issues, but they stopped filming or writing at the important bits.

  19. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,188
    Quote Originally Posted by Solfe View Post
    I throw this out there for the 2.6 seconds of science concern (not content) - The 6th Day. Cloning issues...
    The plot summary sounds absurd. Cloning does not produce instant adults, and clones do not share the original's memories.

  20. #50
    In fairness they did have technology to copy and imprint neurological "mind states" in clones.

    It wasn't an instant adult from a tube thing.

  21. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    147
    Well there is always "Marooned" or Robert Duvall in "Coutdown" which I think was the last fictional movie about a lunar landing.

    Both of those had a nice realistic feel to it.

    Marooned is still a guilty pleasure

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by timb View Post
    The plot summary sounds absurd. Cloning does not produce instant adults, and clones do not share the original's memories.
    Yeah, as DH points out, they do address these points in the story.

    (Particularly since, well, what use is a clone if it's a baby. No commercial viability there. The premise of the film is that they did develop the technology for the purposes of replacing ones adult body and memories. That's commercially viable.)

  23. #53
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    7,307
    Quote Originally Posted by SeanF View Post
    And "Star Trek."
    Gene Roddenberry may not have liked capitalism (I just learned that in this thread), but on the other Star Trek never criticised capitalism openly. Comic relief doesn't really count.

    Looking for a science fiction film critical of the capitalist system, the closest I come up with is the Alien series. At least, as far as mainstream films are concerned.

    Quote Originally Posted by Krel
    No, it is that Gene Roddenberry didn't like the idea of money or capitalism. That's why the Next Gen hemorrhaged writers for the first few years. No money, no disagreements between Star Fleet personnel, ect.
    On the other hand, some of the more recent installments of Star Trek are filled with personal conflict, and they kind of suck.

  24. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    13,886
    I always thought Roddenberry was asking what comes after capitalism. I mean, that's a reasonable speculation.

    As far as satires of capitalism, nothing is meaner, darker or better than Kornbluth's Gladiator-at-Law.

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,109
    Roddenberry changed his mind about the Star Trek economy somewhere along the line. In the first TV series, there are references to when and how much the officers and other Federation characters get paid and how much things cost. By the time they were making movie #4, the same characters had apparently grown up without money.

  26. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    4,065
    Quote Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
    it's also to remind us that they have evolved past the need for petty things like clothing. and war. and racism. and whatever else it is that the writers think should be included in the list of bad things about humanity.
    Notice that in Niven's "Known Space" universe clothes are almost universally optional -- on Earth and in Belt, anyway. Obviously, in that timeline humanity has outgrown nudity hangups.

  27. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Ilya View Post
    Notice that in Niven's "Known Space" universe clothes are almost universally optional -- on Earth and in Belt, anyway. Obviously, in that timeline humanity has outgrown nudity hangups.
    I hope they're well-heated places that offer really good UV protection.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  28. #58
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    4,065
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
    I hope they're well-heated places that offer really good UV protection.
    They do not LACK clothes -- they wear them when needed. Which, BTW, all nudists do -- a good definition of "nudist" is "someone who always knows exactly why he is wearing something." Also, in KS universe melanin boosters are not only ubiquitous, but is some places are legally required, like motorcycle helmets today. Exposing oneself to UV without protection is actually illegal.

  29. #59
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Posts
    7,496
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
    I hope they're well-heated places that offer really good UV protection.
    I hope they've got good plastic surgeons and/or exercise and nutrition programs!

  30. #60
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,834
    Quote Originally Posted by Space Chimp View Post
    You might look into Silent Running, a 1972 movie starring Bruce Dern. It has a heavy ecological theme concerning saving the last of the earth's forests and animal life in space aboard specialized freighters.
    I missed this post earlier- apologies for that. Silent Running really has very unrealistic science. The Valley Forge has artificial gravity, which implies that the Earth has relatively high technology at this time; but the people who launched this ark ship decided to place it in orbit around Saturn, where the sunlight is 1/81 x that at Earth. Eventually the Bruce Dern character realises the mistake.

    We are asked to believe that this 21st century civilisation , which can generate artificial gravity and feed a world, (and has allegedly conquered poverty, apparently) but has no need of plant life, would make such a mistake: and only an egregious nutjob like the Dern character could realise this fact. This aspect of the plot, like many others, is absurd.

Similar Threads

  1. How realistic are Xenomorphs (Aliens)
    By Plat in forum Life in Space
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 2012-Sep-03, 09:41 PM
  2. SpaceX: Is this a realistic way to land
    By Sporally in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2011-Oct-17, 09:54 PM
  3. How Realistic Should SF Be?
    By Brad_Smith in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 202
    Last Post: 2009-Jun-16, 06:11 PM
  4. Fiction's Most Realistic Vision...
    By A.DIM in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2009-Jan-26, 10:53 PM
  5. What is the more realistic option?
    By Drakheim in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 2004-Mar-29, 09:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •