Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 211 to 229 of 229

Thread: british rocketplane by 2020?

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,371
    The senior government minister has given them a supportive statement for their press release (see link on website in Post #205). We are told separately there is £110bn (US$170bn) available to lend to "business", just there for the asking.

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,782
    Quote Originally Posted by kzb View Post
    The senior government minister has given them a supportive statement for their press release (see link on website in Post #205). We are told separately there is £110bn (US$170bn) available to lend to "business", just there for the asking.
    Don't hold your breath. Courtesy of all that public money the banks liquid assets have gone by 50% while lending has increased by 0.2% Frankly choosing between funding from the UK government and UK banks is like being asked if you want to be shot or hung...
    Fortunately REL has stated in the past they have several hundred million in private funding lined up to carry on to the next phase.

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,250
    Maybe space advocates across the pond should suggest funding Skylon by raiding the Carrier budget:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18237029

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,543
    Carriers shmarriers. They are needed you know. the rest of the world does not like to be dominated by the US as much as it is when it comes to military might. Sooo.. if the US will scrap theirs then the rest of us may scap ours.

    on a more serious note. carriers are extremely useful for more than just force projection. they are capable of policing an immense amount of ocean all by it's lonesome. someone got to keep an eye out for those pesky pirates you know.
    The oceans have never been safer to traverse at any time during history than they are right now. this is partly so thanks to carriers and their huge area of influence.
    I could not in good conscience demand that any nation shirk their responsibility to partake in the continuing work that is required to safeguard the international merchant fleets we are all critically dependent on to transport goods and fuel across the globe.

    I would love to see space opened up as a proper frontier for expansion asap. but not at any cost like that.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    35,559
    Quote Originally Posted by publiusr View Post
    Maybe space advocates across the pond should suggest funding Skylon by raiding the Carrier budget:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18237029
    Quote Originally Posted by Antice View Post
    Carriers shmarriers. They are needed you know. the rest of the world does not like to be dominated by the US as much as it is when it comes to military might. Sooo.. if the US will scrap theirs then the rest of us may scap ours.
    Unless someone is going to launch a rocketplane off of a carrier, please do not discuss military budgets, force projection, or similar issues on BAUT.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  6. #216
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    440
    Quote Originally Posted by Swift View Post
    Unless someone is going to launch a rocketplane off of a carrier, please do not discuss military budgets, force projection, or similar issues on BAUT.

    I have to admit it would be really awesome if someone managed to pull that off.

    Fortunately REL has stated in the past they have several hundred million in private funding lined up to carry on to the next phase.
    Good. Do they have enough to make it through the whole thing, or just enough to develop the engines?

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,782
    Quote Originally Posted by aquitaine View Post


    Good. Do they have enough to make it through the whole thing, or just enough to develop the engines?
    I think that's to take them through a prototype engine; going further will take a lot more money but it's what they need for now.

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,543
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
    I think that's to take them through a prototype engine; going further will take a lot more money but it's what they need for now.
    I think i saw mr Hempshell say something along these lines in an interview somewhere. been a while since i saw it, so i cannot remember where atm. At any rate. without an engine there is no vehicle. So it makes sense to complete the engine prototype phase before going much further with the rest of the vehicle.

  9. #219
    That was also the approach we used: rough design of the whole craft so you know what your engines need to be capable of (and to verify that the craft as a whole is more or less achievable), and then focus on detail design of the engine first as that's the major bottleneck (unless the rough design of the whole craft points out differently).

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,543
    Been quiet in this thread for a while. No big news to report really, but i stumbled across this Q/A session where REL answers questions from the readers of the Engineer.

  11. #221
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,782
    Well it appears the major test of the intercooler has been passed!:

    Skylon spaceplane engine concept achieves key milestone

    Next step a scale SABRE prototype, and history in the making!

  12. #222
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,543
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
    Well it appears the major test of the intercooler has been passed!:

    Skylon spaceplane engine concept achieves key milestone

    Next step a scale SABRE prototype, and history in the making!
    Indeed. I'm really stoked about this. I think this is the best shot we got for making space access cheap enough to make us a truly space faring civilization.

  13. #223
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,782
    Quote Originally Posted by Antice View Post
    Indeed. I'm really stoked about this. I think this is the best shot we got for making space access cheap enough to make us a truly space faring civilization.
    I know, I was slightly depressed to see the proposed design for Ariane 6 (another lets shuffle the engines around a bit rocket), so the new from REL was excellent; hopefully the fund-raising goes well.

  14. #224
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    687
    I seen a lot of people from MY side of pond hunging up on Skylon like Second Coming or something like that. It is even funny.

    I see Skylon as something that will need a lot of luck. It will be in 30s (generous, as I assume it will actually exist at all!). Real Skylon will have worse parameters than paper Skylon. And it will have to compete with reusable rockets of future fielded by SpaceX, LockMart, Boeing and whatever will survive until then.

  15. #225
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,782
    Quote Originally Posted by MaDeR View Post
    I seen a lot of people from MY side of pond hunging up on Skylon like Second Coming or something like that. It is even funny.

    I see Skylon as something that will need a lot of luck. It will be in 30s (generous, as I assume it will actually exist at all!). Real Skylon will have worse parameters than paper Skylon. And it will have to compete with reusable rockets of future fielded by SpaceX, LockMart, Boeing and whatever will survive until then.
    Same old. same old. Every time they cross one of the major hurdles someone comes up with a post like this. Frankly I'll take the wild optimists over sour pessimists any day of the week.

  16. #226
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,201
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
    Same old. same old. Every time they cross one of the major hurdles someone comes up with a post like this. Frankly I'll take the wild optimists over sour pessimists any day of the week.
    I saw an aphorism: Optimists invented the airplane; pessimists invented the parachute.

    I've worked in aerospace; even projects that are not as leading-edge as Skylon routinely run over budget and late. It's also routine for performance goals to be unmet.

    Skylon is, regardless of anything else, most definitely a high-risk project, in that it requires several major technical innovations, not least the engines, to work to expectations to succeed. Good luck to them, but they're not guaranteed success.
    Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting.

  17. #227
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,782
    Quote Originally Posted by swampyankee View Post
    I saw an aphorism: Optimists invented the airplane; pessimists invented the parachute.

    I've worked in aerospace; even projects that are not as leading-edge as Skylon routinely run over budget and late. It's also routine for performance goals to be unmet.

    Skylon is, regardless of anything else, most definitely a high-risk project, in that it requires several major technical innovations, not least the engines, to work to expectations to succeed. Good luck to them, but they're not guaranteed success.
    Oh I don't think it's guaranteed but its the people who seem to almost be willing the likes of REL and SpaceX to fail I don't have time for.

  18. #228
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,250
    I want as many in the game as possible. The intercooler is what had me worried. I'm hoping the worst part is over. The European LEA/hexafly programs might pick up interest over this. If one country tries its hand in a certain type of space acess, it causes others to look in the same direction.

    The recent AV Week showed a lot of recent hypersonic advances, with Scramspace on the cover. The H-Magjet concept is interesting (hypermach.com_. I wonder what Musk's hyperloop is supposed to be.

  19. #229
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,543
    Quote Originally Posted by publiusr View Post
    I want as many in the game as possible. The intercooler is what had me worried. I'm hoping the worst part is over. The European LEA/hexafly programs might pick up interest over this. If one country tries its hand in a certain type of space acess, it causes others to look in the same direction.

    The recent AV Week showed a lot of recent hypersonic advances, with Scramspace on the cover. The H-Magjet concept is interesting (hypermach.com_. I wonder what Musk's hyperloop is supposed to be.
    The more teams working on achieving a goal the bigger the chance of overall sucess is. most of these attempts are going to fail. there is no doubt about that, but REL is definately one of the favorites in this race.

Similar Threads

  1. RocketPlane Goes Bust
    By Tuckerfan in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 2010-Jul-25, 12:23 AM
  2. Rocketplane Gets a New Pilot
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2008-Mar-22, 12:47 AM
  3. Former Astronaut Herrington Resigns from Rocketplane
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2008-Jan-08, 01:22 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2007-Nov-01, 08:48 AM
  5. NASA Invests in SpaceX and Rocketplane Kistler
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2006-Aug-31, 05:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •