Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Recession Engineered to Kick the Oil Habit

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315

    Recession Engineered to Kick the Oil Habit

    Warren Platts' recent post, here, provides a couple of links which talks about peak oil production reaching in 2005, and how experts agree that it will take a serious economic downturn before the world turns away from its dependence on oil and towards alternative energy sources.

    Put simply, peak oil is the point where additional increases in production are no longer possible for a variety of reasons, including dwindling or supplies or easily-found additional reserves. Experts surmise that to be around 95-100 million barrels of oil a day, and evidence is increasing that we've already reached peak oil production. The result of reaching peak oil production is a sharp rise in prices, possibly followed by a recession.

    Sound familiar?

    If the recession doesn't happen, or isn't severe enough, the result would be overconfidence which leads to a catestrophic energy failure as the primary resources failed faster than we'd be able to switch to alternative sources. On the other hand, a severe recession would both curb demand, dropping prices, providing temporary relief, while fostering a period of somber reassessment and conversion to alternative sources so as to avoid overdependence on oil.

    Naturally, this leads some to believe, "why not just engineer a recession and force the reassessment/conversion at a much earlier, far less risky (if not catastrophic) date?"



    Uh-huh... It seems we may have done just that, as evidenced by the government's massive, yet highly ineffectual bailout of the financial services industry last year, which resulted in a serious mistrust of government, and a loss of faith in the efficacy of the government when it backfired and the recession continued it's downward spiral.



    Yeah. Obama's economic incentive plan? More of the same, to finish it off, providing a seamless transition between presidencies, and cement the situation whereby the transition to alternative sources becomes an imperitive.



    I'll repost the two links here, and here, for your convenience.

    So how do we counter such governmental manipulation?



    Well... We don't! Nor should we, as we're headed towards a brick wall if we don't convert from oil to other resources, and converting early only benefits us early.

    So, this is one time where being an early adopter may very well be the most patriotic thing you can do.

  2. #2
    Is this a space/astronomy conspiracy theory though?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    13,988
    It really isn't. And the OP is a hair too politically oriented (and not really science-oriented enough to qualify for the exemption), so a move to OTB wouldn't really be appropriate either. Sorry Mugs.

    As always, if somebody can make a good enough case otherwise, PM either myself or another mod.

Similar Threads

  1. Procrastinating Again? How to Kick the Habit
    By Disinfo Agent in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 2008-Dec-12, 09:45 AM
  2. Nano-Engineered Liquid Mirror Telescopes
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-Feb-27, 04:00 PM
  3. Chickens engineered to produce cancer drugs.
    By Doodler in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2007-Jan-15, 11:15 PM
  4. Genetically engineered cows to be immune to mad cow disease.
    By Doodler in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2007-Jan-08, 09:48 PM
  5. I've broken the <font> habit
    By Glom in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2006-Feb-19, 10:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •