I like building models (I have one of the lander which I really need to build), but a reader just sent me a link to one that has some, um, interesting illustrations and comments. I leave the reviews to you.
Apollo Capsule and Command Module
I like building models (I have one of the lander which I really need to build), but a reader just sent me a link to one that has some, um, interesting illustrations and comments. I leave the reviews to you.
Apollo Capsule and Command Module
GILLIGAN!!!!! :P
Yes. On the te CSM isn't too bad, although it lacks a few details. The LM however has a dippy HGA and no docking drogue. The metal rods that are used to link the two can upset the overall effect as well.
So, the command module stayed in Earth orbit, and the LM can be docked with the command module via its engine bell, eh? Interesting...
From the website...
That's just kinda wacky.They can be snapped together in either position...
It took me a good 5 minutes to stop laughing.![]()
Heh, I can beat that, BA. Here's the plans to the LM I'm attempting to build. First thing I want you to do when you click on the link, is to see who came up with the plans, then see if you can spot the errors in the plans (don't feel bad if you can't, I didn't spot them either until I started working on the rassin' frassin' thing).
Hi Phil,Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
I too freely admit my total geeky youth (and occasional adulthood) as a model builder. With me it was WWI, 1920s/30s, WWII and jet planes. I then moved beyond the plastic kits and started scratch building the weird rare planes, all in the same scale of 1/72. With spacecraft, I built the Revel kit of the Apollo 11, and as a kid, had the Atlas and various other rocket kits (which were usually basically just half tubes glued together.)
I think Airfix had an Apollo 11 kit too, and a Gemini capsule complete with seated astronauts. There is a company that actually makes kits of various satellites and space probes. I'll try to find out what it is. :wink:
This is where thinking "outside the box" turns ugly.
Does anyone else get the vague sense that the mis-matched CSM-LM image is somehow... dirty?
ok ! i admit i am confused
i know or atleast think i know whats ` wrong ` namely :
1 one of the configurations mates the lunar descender motor with the command module dock ring
2 that bit of the lunar module was left on the surface and only the ` top section ` re docked to allow all 3 astronauts to return home
so barring an accident before descent - there is no way to produce that second docking config - even ignoring the fact the descent engine is in the wa
as an aside - where is that ` bit of the LM ` now was it jettisoned in lunar orbit ? is it still there ?
but to quit the rambling - suspecting some hoax element i looked around the site and asWWII warbirds is one of my secret fetishes i looked at thier representations of a random selection and found no errors
so why is the appollo page so wrong ? has an one written to the company - i would but would rather let someone more articulate speak
YRS - APE
Is that your final answer?Originally Posted by ignorant_ape
Seriously, they feature one of my favorite pet peeves right there - calling the V-1 a rocket. It's a plane with jet propulsion. They also call it "un-guided", which is rather inaccurate.
Other random observations - they claim the Bf-109 had automatic flaps, it really had automatic slats.
Yeah, it has something of PC blown out of proportions - not to say that the whole idea of PC is pretty silly.Originally Posted by Starbuck
Harald
Scroll down on this page to see some nifty kits:Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
http://scikits.com/Catalog.html (Includes a kit of the HST!)
:wink:
P.S. They're made of paper! (Cosmic Origami?)
OK I'll admit as well, longtime model maker, not space related oddly , but I do have bucket load of modelling links , try
http://www.realspacemodels.com/
superb models, and excellent plans/references for those tacking the CSM/LM stack
One fo these days I'll start seriously on the 1/32 LM I've got in storage !
I always thought the LM was below the CM in the stack, with shrouding around it. Don't remember ever seeing a configuration with the LM's engine bell mated to the front of the CM....
My fiancée brought up an interesting possibility: while it is inaccurate to display the LM docked to the CSM by it's engine bell, she suggested that they may have chosen to display it mounted that way to display the topside of the LM.
So I guess the question is: was the BA induced by ignorance or by marketing? (Insert obvious "same thing" joke here, if you're of a mind.)
Maybe the pic on the left is an 'undocumented feature' through which they could cook dinner faster![]()
That's still my favorite bit. Was that an undocumented feature too?One of them remained in the module, maintaining it in earth orbit and providing communication with Mission Command back on Earth.
My personal favorite was in those plans Tuckerfan posted.... poor thing has a reactor and a heat shield.Come to think of it, the LM would have been really neat that way...
woah!Originally Posted by scotsman
the mother lode.. Thanks scotsman!
I'm into scale model rocketry myself.. these resin kits would most likely be too heavy to do a PMC (Plastic Model Conversion) into a flying model.. (did that with a 1/144 scale Saturn V on an Estes D motor) but they would be excellent for making casts of parts in a lighter plastic.
Someday I'll build my flying large scale flying LEM (complete with clear plastic fins built into the landing leg structure)That'll be a scratch build most likely.
-cheers
Look here for a 1:96 paper saturn V. On the bottom of the page is a link to some guy's Saturn he converted into a flying model.Originally Posted by Krosis
Harald
hey thanks for the link!
I've got an Estes Saturn V in progress now.. it's designed for a single D motor.. and I'm modifying it for at least an E..
-cheers
Hi guys , glad I was able to help with the link,
One of these days I'll shell out for te LM pland from Realspace, and start seriusly on my 32nd scale LM, its a "garage", (ie rough!) kit from the UK, which needs a Lot of finessing, but since it cost me £100, ($170) some years ago, I'm not in any real hurry to start it!
A few years back FineScale modeller , the premier US modelling mag ran an artice about a gentelman who builds space models, and greatest atchievement was a 1/48th Saturn 5 stack, and launch tower, 12 feet fo so , he was going to fly it, no really, but changed his mind at the last minute!
I've seen a Saturn V model that large flown on a cluster of High Power motors.. 2-3 K's.. maybe they were I's.. can't remember.. anyway.. most impressive.
I saw an article in a High Power Rocketry Mag about a guy (and his team) that built and flew a 1/25 scale V2.. on an O motor.. whew..![]()
-cheers
Oh, great. Like I don't have enough pending projects already. I have most of the SciKits models, as well as plastic Saturn V, Shuttle, and Hubble models, all waiting for me to get enough round tuits. Not to mention finding display space in a small house that's already lined with books. If I ever get to retire, I'll have plenty to keep me occupied.Originally Posted by kucharek
Check out the other models they have. One is a bunch of JPEGs of the Gulf Oil LM model. I remember that from my kid-hood.
Fred
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684