Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Trio of "super" earth's found (misleading article title?)

  1. #1

    Trio of "super" earth's found (misleading article title?)

    http://space.newscientist.com/articl...-way-star.html

    copyrighted material removed by moderator. It duplicates what's behind the hyperlink.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,829
    A few words of friendly advice (not just for your benefit).
    First:
    Considering this is quite an astronomical discovery, and the story is on just about every media outlet, odds are the people here would already have discussed it so it might be worth a quick search.
    Yes; a Universe today story with discussion here.
    General discussion here.

    Second:
    Long links don't paste well here, they get chopped off in the middle. But; this story is on just about any media outlet anyway.

    Third:
    Be careful how much you cut/paste to the board, you may be flirting with copyrights.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
    Second:
    Long links don't paste well here, they get chopped off in the middle. But; this story is on just about any media outlet anyway.
    Long links are fine, carefully copy and pasted. a-l-e-x didn't copy and paste a URL, though. a-l-e-x copied and pasted some abbreviated string of junk, with an ellipsis in the middle -- and it is therefore a link to nothing.

    Bad URL provided is:
    Code:
    http://space.newscientist.com/articl...-way-star.html
    URL intended is:
    Code:
    http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn14149-trio-of-superearths-found-around-milky-way-star.html
    Article is New Scientist: Trio of super-Earths found around Milky Way star.

    Just pasted there, and ugly, but yet functional is: http://space.newscientist.com/articl...-way-star.html

    Quote Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
    Third:
    Be careful how much you cut/paste to the board, you may be flirting with copyrights.
    That's not flirting with a copyright, that's a marriage to a verbatim copy.
    © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,829
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
    Long links are fine, carefully copy and pasted.
    Right, I used "don't copy well" as shorthand for what you explained better. Yes; the URL is needed, not just a link name(or whatever) which probably is truncated for viewing.
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
    That's not flirting with a copyright, that's a marriage to a verbatim copy.
    Without the link, it was hard to tell.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
    Without the link, it was hard to tell.
    If in doubt, Google's your friend.
    Just grab a distinct looking sentence and search for "The whole sentence.", usually google will provide a link.
    That's the usual way I confirm it when a link hasn't been included in something that smells like a copy.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,829
    Quote Originally Posted by HenrikOlsen View Post
    If in doubt, Google's your friend.
    Yes; good advice always, but in this case I didn't feel I needed to dig. Thus, the winkie face.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
    Long links are fine, carefully copy and pasted. a-l-e-x didn't copy and paste a URL, though. a-l-e-x copied and pasted some abbreviated string of junk, with an ellipsis in the middle -- and it is therefore a link to nothing.

    Bad URL provided is:
    Code:
    http://space.newscientist.com/articl...-way-star.html
    URL intended is:
    Code:
    http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn14149-trio-of-superearths-found-around-milky-way-star.html
    Article is New Scientist: Trio of super-Earths found around Milky Way star.

    Just pasted there, and ugly, but yet functional is: http://space.newscientist.com/articl...-way-star.html



    That's not flirting with a copyright, that's a marriage to a verbatim copy.

    Sorry, I wasnt aware it would be truncated like that.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by a-l-e-x View Post
    Sorry, I wasnt aware it would be truncated like that.
    Not a big deal. It probably happened when you tried to copy a URL that was not actually a URL but just some text abbreviated for display.

    We all need to be careful about providing links that work. I proofread mine, but to make sure I usually try to exercise links I provide to make sure they function. If I think my readers might find them useful, I want them to work.

    Thanks for the article.

  9. #9
    Anytime! Im glad there's so much more info on this than just that one article. This is a fascinating time to live in-- on the brink of discovery. In some way, shape or form, I feel like we're reliving the "Age of Discovery," when great explorers like Columbus, Magellan and Drake sailed the seas. Of course, all we can do is observe from afar at this point-- but it really does spark the imagination!

Similar Threads

  1. Three "Super-Earths" Found Orbiting One Star
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-Jun-16, 01:40 PM
  2. Misleading article title
    By Hydro in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 2008-Mar-01, 01:20 PM
  3. Earth "air" found on Moon
    By cran in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Aug-06, 12:38 AM
  4. Earth "Air" Found on the Moon
    By Eroica in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2005-Aug-05, 08:16 PM
  5. Scientists find "Super Earth" orbiting nearby star
    By Excelsior in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2004-Aug-27, 11:05 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •