WHat happened?
I was away for awhile busy with life and I return looking forward to continuing conversation to find Intellectual Design thread was closed and Neverfly was Banned...
http://www.bautforum.com/against-mai...design-14.html
WHat happened?
I was away for awhile busy with life and I return looking forward to continuing conversation to find Intellectual Design thread was closed and Neverfly was Banned...
http://www.bautforum.com/against-mai...design-14.html
ATM threads are closed after 30 days automatically.
Neverfly is not permanently banned.
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Thanks, I see now.... Makes sense to let old threads die.
Anyway to reopen, don't want to start new thread to continue conversation.
It's not so much letting old threads die, but here in ATM of lighting a 30-day fuze on any topic that may promote some ATM idea, so that the advocate is focused, responsive, concise, and unable to lobby without limit.
See topic New Policies Regarding Against the Mainstream section.
OK, supppose after 30-days of focused and concise arguments you assume the thread started has made a case for their argument.
I think the thread turned into more of a discussion than it did a debate for a ATM idea. Hopefully these type of discussions would allow one to see/understand, learn about and question not only others viewpoints, but their own as well.
Where could I post such discussion?
Ideally, an ATM thread will be fairly focussed. An idea is proposed, and discussed. After thirty days that thread closes, but NEW aspects of the topic can be opened for new discussion. New evidence, new reworking of the idea, narrow focus on a particular aspect. All of these can justify a new thread. It is a judgment call by the community that reads the ATM section whether some new thread really is new, or simply a rehashing because the original poster keeps assuming that opposition to his/her idea is only because he/she hasn't repeated it often enough.
Forming opinions as we speak
how many times has neverfly been banned?
I have only been banned once, but it was really cool.
Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
Hint: this is at heart a scientific forum, and underneath the fooling around there are some diamond-hard minds hanging about, ready to tear you to shreads. -- Mike Alexander
It is kind of like the whole bad-boy thing.
Heh I was at the book store the other day and there was a book:
Thugs and the Women Who Love Them.
Last edited by BetaDust; 2008-Jun-11 at 05:54 PM. Reason: BIG Typo.
Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
Hint: this is at heart a scientific forum, and underneath the fooling around there are some diamond-hard minds hanging about, ready to tear you to shreads. -- Mike Alexander
OK hows this