Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Source of Mercury's Core

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,166

    Source of Mercury's Core

    Mercury still has a motlen core and a magnetic field. What is the source of this?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    6,773
    Uh, heat?
    All comments made in red are moderator comments. Please, read the rules of the forum here and read the additional rules for ATM, and for conspiracy theories. If you think a post is inappropriate, don't comment on it in thread but report it using the /!\ button in the lower left corner of each message. But most of all, have fun!

    Bi-weekly space physics research "blog" at tusenfem.blogspot.co.at

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    297
    The core of Mercury produces heat from radioactive decay just as the Earth.

    Perhaps "still" alludes to the idea of the small core of a small planet cooling off more quickly. This would have happened too, if not for the large solar influx reducing the thermal gradient from the core to the surface.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    Add in tidal flexure due to Mercury's elliptical orbit very deep in the Sun's gravity well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,237
    And I assume the fact that Mercury has a very large core for the size of the planet.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,448
    How about:

    When did they start thinking that Mercury has a liquid core?

    Has anyone heared any evidence that the core is liquid? If so, what is it?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,448
    Quote Originally Posted by G O R T View Post
    The core of Mercury produces heat from radioactive decay just as the Earth.

    Perhaps "still" alludes to the idea of the small core of a small planet cooling off more quickly. This would have happened too, if not for the large solar influx reducing the thermal gradient from the core to the surface.
    The thermal gradient isnt that much different when going from 3000K to 700K as when going from 3000K to 300K. The gradients for Mercury and the Moon should be more dependent on composition than on radiation influx.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,166
    Thanks. My reasoning is, since Mercury still has a liquid core and Mars doesn't, what's the difference between the two worlds?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    18,938
    Quote Originally Posted by RalofTyr View Post
    Thanks. My reasoning is, since Mercury still has a liquid core and Mars doesn't, what's the difference between the two worlds?
    Composition and tidal flux. And Mars' core is speculated to still be semi-molten, not solid.
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,237
    Quote Originally Posted by RalofTyr View Post
    Thanks. My reasoning is, since Mercury still has a liquid core and Mars doesn't, what's the difference between the two worlds?
    Although Mars' magnetic field is a remnant and no longer global in nature, Mars has had volcanic eruptions in the recent geologic past (certainly in the millions of years, rather than billions, since the most recent eruptions).

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,192
    Quote Originally Posted by korjik View Post
    How about:

    When did they start thinking that Mercury has a liquid core?

    Has anyone heared any evidence that the core is liquid? If so, what is it?
    VERY strong magnetic field. Stronger than Mars and, I think, stronger than Venus. Only a molten core could produce such a strong field.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    6,773
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Jubjub View Post
    VERY strong magnetic field. Stronger than Mars and, I think, stronger than Venus. Only a molten core could produce such a strong field.
    well, it is not difficult to have a stronger magnetic field than Mars or Venus, as the two siblings don't have an internal magnetic field, only an induced magnetosphere.
    All comments made in red are moderator comments. Please, read the rules of the forum here and read the additional rules for ATM, and for conspiracy theories. If you think a post is inappropriate, don't comment on it in thread but report it using the /!\ button in the lower left corner of each message. But most of all, have fun!

    Bi-weekly space physics research "blog" at tusenfem.blogspot.co.at

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    297
    Quote Originally Posted by korjik View Post
    The thermal gradient isnt that much different when going from 3000K to 700K as when going from 3000K to 300K. The gradients for Mercury and the Moon should be more dependent on composition than on radiation influx.
    Crustal composition is important but to a fair degree ubiquitous. The point is that typical igneous and metamorphic crustal materials have a non-linear thermal conductivity which typically transmits 3 to 7 times more (phonon) heat flow at temperatures below some 270K than above 500K-600K.

Similar Threads

  1. Mars' core/Earth's core
    By Bug-Eyed Earl in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 2007-Nov-08, 05:04 PM
  2. Mercury has a molten core
    By Paracelsus in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2007-Sep-16, 01:30 PM
  3. Mercury May still have a Molten Core
    By dgavin in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2007-Jul-10, 07:50 PM
  4. Mercury has a liquid core
    By Lord Jubjub in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2007-May-07, 05:59 PM
  5. Mysterious radio source at galaxy's core
    By ToSeek in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2005-Mar-02, 09:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •