Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: M92: Not just Hercules' other globular

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,940

    M92: Not just Hercules' other globular

    Continuing to clean the hard drive last night after my clear but -30C skies quickly clouded over I found this from last summer. How I failed to process it at the time then forgot about it I don't know as this is some of the best seeing I've ever enjoyed at this location. The 5 minutes sub frames were a bit too long as the core saturated on me a bit. Other than that I'm happy about how it turned out.

    14" LX200R, LRGB all are 6x5' binned 2x2, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME.

    Cropped and reduced for bandwidth limits. For full size image see:
    http://www.spacebanter.com/attachmen...tid=1657&stc=1

    Rick
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,263
    Second globular in as many days.
    What I like, especially about this one, is how beautifully you've managed to capture the extremely faint compnents without overexposing the core. Nice work.

    -Veeger

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,263
    Hi Rick.
    This is one great image. Clear skies to you. Paul

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Veeger View Post
    Second globular in as many days.
    What I like, especially about this one, is how beautifully you've managed to capture the extremely faint compnents without overexposing the core. Nice work.

    -Veeger
    That's made possible by the wide dynamic range of the CCD. Something DSLRs still don't do. They can if the electronics for it were provided but to reduce file size that isn't done. Unfortunately a computer monitor doesn't have the range needed to display the full range so it is highly compressed on the image. In reality the brighness of the brightest to dimmest stars in this image is about 10 magnitudes or 10,000 times. A computer monitor only has 256 levels in the Luminosity image that color is added to. So this isn't how it looks in any telescope. Pretty but not realistic at all.

    Rick

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,142
    A forgotten treasure, Another beautiful photo of star clusters. Outstanding Image Rick. Clear Skies

  6. #6
    Rick, that is a beautiful result!
    ver y well done

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    878
    Stunning. So sharp. And despite your concern about saturation there is great detail right through the core. Once again masterful work.

    Kind regards
    Matt

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,211
    Thank u for this gorgeous Image Rick!!!
    Clear Skies M8!

    Dennis
    Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr

    Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit

    Hint: this is at heart a scientific forum, and underneath the fooling around there are some diamond-hard minds hanging about, ready to tear you to shreads. -- Mike Alexander

  9. #9
    Rick,

    Beautiful image of this great object. The color in the stars is very nice.

    --Andy

  10. #10
    Simply gorgeous!!!

    Tom

Similar Threads

  1. Hercules' other globular -- no not M92
    By RickJ in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2012-Jan-25, 02:58 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2011-Sep-10, 12:40 PM
  3. M13 - Hercules Cluster
    By Paramount in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2011-May-04, 01:24 PM
  4. M13 Hercules Globular Star Cluster with IC4617 Galaxy
    By Galactic2000 in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2010-Jul-04, 11:44 AM
  5. M13 - The Great Globular Cluster in Hercules
    By reckless in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2007-Aug-24, 04:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •