Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Most Stable Nucleus

  1. #1

    Most Stable Nucleus

    I only have a rudimentary understanding of nuclear physics. I understand the basic principles of nuclear fusion and nuclear fission, but I know nothing of the actual mechanics (if you can call them that) of a nuclear reaction, which is why I can't answer this question myself. I simply want to know if my understanding is correct on the following points:

    -Iron has the most stable nucleus of all the elements.
    -Both fission and fusion of iron nuclei are endothermic reactions. It is not possible to extract energy from an iron nucleus by a nuclear reaction. Iron is the only element with this property. (I would expect there would be certain unstable isotopes of iron that can undergo nuclear decay, so the above would be a conditional statement.)

    Finally, my understanding of these points carries the implication that the universe tends to turn into iron. This is a statement I don't recall ever hearing mentioned by anyone else so I'm wondering if this is indeed correct.

    Thanks for your answers everyone!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    4,078
    Yes on all counts.

    Assuming proton decay does not exist (the jury is still out on that one), quantum tunneling will cause all normal matter to transform into iron in 101600 years.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Ilya View Post
    ... in 101600 years.
    Or thereabouts.

  4. #4
    Oh, the irony!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    19,207
    I Am Iron Man! (or will be someday.)
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,541
    Coincidentally, I was reading about nuclear binding energy today, and I came across a credible-looking page saying that the stablest nucleus is actually that of 62Ni.

    (If anyone has a subscription to the American Journal of Physics, s/he may want to look at the original paper here.)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    887
    Correct.

    "Shurtleff and Derringh (1989) show that Ni-62 is slightly more tightly bound per nucleon than Fe-56, but Fe-56 is much more common because of the detailed synthetic pathways available to create it, compared to those available for Ni-62, in the stellar interior. (Most of the Ni-62 is created in nova and supernova explosions.) " taken from http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~piccard/r...s/stellar.html

Similar Threads

  1. Least useful stable element?
    By Nereid in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 2010-Sep-29, 03:19 AM
  2. The curtain of the stable.
    By mexhunter in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 2009-Nov-19, 09:05 PM
  3. Which is stable more stable ?
    By vkp in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2006-Jul-24, 11:33 AM
  4. How stable is this?
    By Evan in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2004-Dec-18, 09:14 AM
  5. How stable is the Sun?
    By Banquo's Ghost in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2002-Dec-20, 12:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •