Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Which weighs more?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,851

    Which weighs more?

    A tonne of feathers, or a tonne of rocks?

    I've only just realised that this old, old chestnut is quite a difficult question.

    Any ideas?

  2. #2
    Well, I got out my scales, I weighed a ton of rocks and then I weighed a ton of feathers. And you know what? They both weighed one ton. Imagine that!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,543

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
    Well, I got out my scales, I weighed a ton of rocks and then I weighed a ton of feathers. And you know what? They both weighed one ton. Imagine that!
    Was that a ton? or a tonne? or a short ton?

  4. #4
    I remember an old thread with this in, and the complexity involves buoyancy, so the answer is the most dense weighs more, probably the rocks I guess.

  5. #5
    Was that a ton? or a tonne? or a short ton?
    It's quite simple really. We are discussing the weight of feathers. So what has feathers? The answer is simple, a duck. So if the rocks weigh as much as a duck, it's a ton.

    Or you could just use the metric system. If you're lazy.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    20,861
    not difficult they weigh the same a tonne.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,851
    I think one valid answer may, paradoxically, be the feathers.
    Remember that the units for mass and weight are often the same.

  8. #8
    wouldn't the 1 tonne mass of feathers have more buoyancy(in air), than the 1 tonne mass of stones, therefore weighing less?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    554
    What weighs more? A 10,000 size chicken (who once had feathers; apparently someone has been going around shaving birds to get a tonne of them for research or something) or a ton (metric) of bricks?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,731
    A ton is one hundred runs in cricket and carries a lot more in the record books! so there! ducky!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,851
    A tonne (in mass) of rocks on Mars would weigh less.
    There are no tonnes of feathers on Mars, or anywhere else in the Solar system. So on average a tonne of rocks would weigh less.
    But I don't know what the average weight of rocks in the universe is (note the traditional question asks about weight and rocks, not mass and rock...

Similar Threads

  1. muscle weighs more than fat?
    By 3dknight in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2007-Dec-02, 02:14 PM
  2. Walker Texas Ranger weighs in on evolution
    By soylentgreen in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2006-Oct-26, 10:55 AM
  3. James McCanney weighs in on Sedna
    By Lycus in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 2004-Mar-24, 03:19 AM
  4. The Western Australian weighs in
    By JayUtah in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2003-Mar-20, 06:49 PM
  5. Scientific American weighs in
    By The Bad Astronomer in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2003-Jan-14, 05:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •