More Inconsistencies

[tmosher]

I just have to shake my head in disbelief when I looked at the latest images posted on you know who's site.

In the span of three different images posted on the same day, the apparent size of planet X in relation to the sun varies by at least 200%. In one image it is approximately 1/4 the size of the sun - in another the same size.

If you're going to post lens flares as proof of planet X at least have them showing to be the same size.

I give up criticizing her - she's her own worst critic.

[dgruss23]

It would be an interesting study to see just how many non-scientists on the street could make that connection. I have no idea what the percentage would be, but obviously there are some out there. Hopefully what we'd find out is that most people would notice those discrepancies and that we're dealing with the rare and clueless when we deal with PX people.

[Sammy]

It would be an interesting study to see just how many non-scientists on the street could make that connection. I have no idea what the percentage would be, but obviously there are some out there. Hopefully what we'd find out is that most people would notice those discrepancies and that we're dealing with the rare and clueless when we deal with PX people.

Not the folks who think the size and location of the Moon has changed, or that a heat wave in Europe is a sign of PX's arrival!

[fingolfen]

It would be an interesting study to see just how many non-scientists on the street could make that connection. I have no idea what the percentage would be, but obviously there are some out there. Hopefully what we'd find out is that most people would notice those discrepancies and that we're dealing with the rare and clueless when we deal with PX people.

I like the idea, but I'm not optimistic about how such a study would come out. It sounds a little like the old "ban dihydrogen monoxide" campaign a few years back. It really underscored how ignorent people are about basic science especially when bad science is marketed properly.

[Dancar]

I just have to shake my head in disbelief when I looked at the latest images posted on you know who's site.

In the span of three different images posted on the same day, the apparent size of planet X in relation to the sun varies by at least 200%. In one image it is approximately 1/4 the size of the sun - in another the same size.

If you're going to post lens flares as proof of planet X at least have them showing to be the same size.

I give up criticizing her - she's her own worst critic.

A list of consistancies on Nancy's site would be more difficult to write.

[pixelator]

A list of consistancies on Nancy's site would be more difficult to write.

Luckily Nancy has done a very good job of documenting her inconsistancies herself. Just read any page on her site.

[ToSeek]

I just have to shake my head in disbelief when I looked at the latest images posted on you know who's site.

In the span of three different images posted on the same day, the apparent size of planet X in relation to the sun varies by at least 200%. In one image it is approximately 1/4 the size of the sun - in another the same size.

If you're going to post lens flares as proof of planet X at least have them showing to be the same size.

I give up criticizing her - she's her own worst critic.

A list of consistancies on Nancy's site would be more difficult to write.

Beginning of list


End of list

[Sammy]

The pix posted for August 7 are the best yet! PX appears in five or so different locations arround the Sun! That planet has more moves than a Rap Grandmaster!

Also, the "Third Persona" makes its inaugural appearance. How about a big hand for the new kid on the block!! =D> =D>