Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Spinning round planets, using planets as slingshots and crashing into a planet...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    349

    Orbiting around planets, and using planets as slingshots.

    How do scientists know how far from a planet they send their space craft, so the planet will be used as a slingshot, or for their craft to orbit it, so it doesn't miss the planet completely or crash into it?

    And how do they know which position it should be in when sent further into place so it works out? And how do they make it do this? Do all spacecraft have little thrusters that are radio controlled or something?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,613
    Quote Originally Posted by Ross PK81 View Post
    How do scientists know how far from a planet they send their space craft, so the planet will be used as a slingshot, or for their craft to orbit it, so it doesn't miss the planet completely or crash into it?
    A lot of complicated math that I don't know. But; the range of error is known, and they only need to be as far away from that planet as the range of error indicates.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ross PK81 View Post
    Do all spacecraft have little thrusters that are radio controlled or something?
    Yes; some for actual maneuvering, some just for attitude control. Although the attitude controlled ones can use sensors instead of radio control.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    349
    Thanks.

  4. #4
    See topic Titanic Headscratching

    Keep an eye out for porkchop plots, like these described for a simpler Mars mission: NASA feature: "Porkchop" is the First Menu Item on a Trip to Mars

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
    Posts
    4,024
    The performing of the calculations is a beastly job, and modern computers make it doable in a reasonable amount of time. In theory, Newton or Leibniz could have done it with pen and paper, but it might have taken a lifetime to get even a rough result.

  6. #6
    So how does our trajectory calculations now stack up to the ones done for e.g. Voyager in the 1970's? Could the tricks performed with Cassini have been done back then? (I'm thinking of the Titan encounter where Cassini's trajectory had to go into Plan B because it could not extract the datastream from Huygens otherwise).

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2012-Jun-24, 09:08 PM
  2. Why don't gas planets coalesce in to solid planets?
    By SanitysEdge in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 2011-Mar-24, 05:46 PM
  3. Iron planets vs Rocky planets
    By Lord Jubjub in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2010-Jul-17, 10:49 PM
  4. What's the highest montains/place on Mercury and another planets/minor planets?
    By m1omg in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2008-Mar-14, 02:46 PM
  5. Is life on other planets restricted to "Earth-like" planets?
    By EdLee in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 2006-Aug-04, 12:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •