Indeed, there's a growing list of scientists who seem to support the idea in some fashion or other.
As for me personally, I'm interested not in "truth" but "fact," no matter where it leads.
"“Chemistry in space and ‘normal chemistry’ can be very different because the concentrations and energy-exchange processes are different. These features make the study of chemistry in space very exciting and academically challenging; one really must think without prejudice.”
Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?