Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Planets made from stellar remnants with hair?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    150

    Planets made from stellar remnants with hair?

    The planets in the solar system are made from the heavier elements created inside earlier and now long dead stars.

    Were the planets in our solar system made out of the remnants of one star or many?

    If many, then is there any way to identify matter contributed by the different types of stars, such as isotopes, radioactivity, etc?

  2. #2
    Wikipedia: Formation and evolution of the Solar System :: Initial formation

    The current hypothesis of the Solar System's formation is the nebular hypothesis, first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg. [...]

    One of these regions of collapsing gas (known as the pre-solar nebula) would form what became the Sun. This region had a diameter of between 7000 and 20,000 AU and a mass just over that of the Sun (between 1.001 and 1.1 solar masses). Its composition was believed to be about the same as the Sun today: about 98% (by mass) hydrogen and helium present since the Big Bang, and 2% heavier elements created by earlier generations of stars which died and ejected them back into interstellar space (see nucleosynthesis).
    Space.com: Tracing Our Sun's Family Tree

    New research into the chemical composition of stars could identify our Sun's long lost family and begin to unravel the complex history of our galaxy.
    [...]
    Our Sun was born in an open cluster some 4.6 billion years ago, growing alongside its sibling stars like grapes on a vine, theorists say. Meteorites hold evidence for this close companionship in that they contain traces of the radioactive decay of the isotope Iron-60 which is only produced when a large star explodes in a supernova.

    The VLT data obtained by De Silva has now confirmed the stars in each open cluster have their own distinctive "flavor."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    150
    Thanks. I was aware of the wiki article but I wasn't sure how well mixed a pre-solar-nebula was and whether it was therefore likely that we formed mostly or exclusively out of the remains of one very large star or lots mixed up.

    I hadn't seen the space.com one. This suggests that we are from at least a partially mixed cloud and is detectable. Cool.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnBStone View Post
    I hadn't seen the space.com one. This suggests that we are from at least a partially mixed cloud and is detectable. Cool.
    Yeah, we might find our siblings some day, though they've likely traveled far away. Mom, Dad, Aunts and Uncles are gone, but maybe we can figure out a little bit about our pedigree.

Similar Threads

  1. Planets and their Remnants around White Dwarfs
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Nov-01, 04:40 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2007-Apr-02, 09:31 PM
  3. Spitzer Finds Planets Thrive Around Stellar Twins
    By A.DIM in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2007-Mar-31, 01:08 PM
  4. Could the remnants of planets be detected when a star goes
    By banquo's_bumble_puppy in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-01, 06:13 PM
  5. Stellar disk doesn't want to form planets
    By ToSeek in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Jul-19, 04:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •