What is the coldest body in our Solar system that we know of?
What is the coldest body in our Solar system that we know of?
Does the Ort Cloud qualify as part of the Solar System? Or does the 'Solar System' end with that used-to-be-a-planet Pluto?
Sol system extents far beyond Pluto.
Eris is certainly not.
Sedna has it's aphelion 1000 AU.
Is there anything colder than it?
While it's probably not the coldest place, I have read that Titan is probably the only place in the Solar System where you'd freeze to death even in a space suit, since it actually has a cold atmosphere to drain your heat, as opposed to the vacuum environments you'd find on Asteroids or those dwarf planets way out there.
If you have good heating in your spacesuit, you will not freeze.
Might be easier to just drive around in a heated and vacuum-insulated vehicle, and use telepresence on the surface.
STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary
Aerogel will do it.That thing is used on a Mars rovers and can hold inner temp. of the equipement at 25 degress Celsius while the outside temp. can be -100 degress.Read more on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerogel .
With modern technology you can walk on every place of the Sol system except Sun.
And Tian atmosphere is only 2 bar and almost pure N2.That smog is primarily in the high layers.And today's NON AEROGEL insulation systems used on a liquid hydrogen stations (for LOH powered cars like the new variant of BMW) can hold a boiling coffee 80 days until it cool enough to be drinked.
But yes, if you use ordinary ISS spacesuit, you will freeze, however, it is easy to engineer one in what you will not freeze.
And why use vecihle?Stop underestimating modern technology.
And Mars is only 30 degress warmer than Titan in some places and also it has an atmosphere.
Aerogel is not flexible. It would make for a very awkward spacesuit design.
It's very easy to conceptualize one. Engineering it, and actually building it, would be much more complicated.But yes, if you use ordinary ISS spacesuit, you will freeze, however, it is easy to engineer one in what you will not freeze.
STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary
Would that include Mercury:
To what temperature extremes have Aerogel suits been tested and proven to sustain human life?Surface temperatures on Mercury range from about 90 to 700 K (−180 to 430°C, −292 to 806°F)
,
Depends on what you mean by "body". If I understand it correctly, there are some places (crater bottoms) on our moon which never will be touched by any sunlight. Without knowing thermal conductivity values of our moon´s material in these places, I would expect that these places are very cold.
Using Celestia.According to it, the aphelion temperature of Sedna is only 9 Kelvin, frigidly cold -264.15 degress Celsius, or -443.47 degress Fahrenheith.And reason with common sense, object 1000 AU from the Sun is logically colder than one 97 AU from Sun.Stop demanding calculation, all you need is logic.
And aerogel spacesuits were never constructed but could be.But it is a impractical in spacesuits, it will shatter with a little pressure change; however it could be more practical as insulation for habitats and when protected by the layer of the harder thing, it could be almost perfect insulation. but read;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerogel
Look:
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1e/Stardust_Dust_Collector_with_aerogel.jpg/660px-
Stardust_Dust_Collector_with_aerogel.jpg[/IMG]
It basically conducts (almost) no heat.
A sunless crater on Senda might have imo temperatures about the temperature of the cosmic background radiation+cosmic radiation+ micrometeorites.I guess it will be about 4-5 K.
I didn’t demand anything. I was asking if you had performed any precise calculations to demonstrate specifically what the temperature differential would be between 97au and 1,000au. My common sense would tend to dictate that the Sun’s radiation at 97au would be minute; hence, the difference between 97 and 1,000 would be fairly insignificant. What I am asking is how you can quantitatively define how much colder Sedna is compared to Eris, as you claim?
But you said:
I did read the link; thanks. And I think what you meant to state is that the heat resistant properties of Aerogel appear promising for future application in space missions. And that perhaps this material may some day even be developed to the point that may allow humans to walk on now seemingly unlikely surfaces.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
.
There are more considerations for determining the coldest body besides simply distance from the Sun. For instance, according to NASA, Triton is the coldest measured body in our solar system, though certainly not furthest from the Sun.
Triton is colder than any other measured object in the Solar System with a surface temperature of -235° C (-391° F).
According to this temperature calculator, http://www.astro.indiana.edu/~gsimon...perature1.html , the temperature of Sedna assuming it's albedo is 0.2, is only 9 Kelvin , which confirm Celestia number.
Eris is 29 K cold, but this is +20 K temperature difference.
From 97 AU the Sun is still relatively bright.
From 1000 AU, however, it have 1/2 the brightness of the full moon.
And according to Wikipedia, temperature on Sedna never rises above 30 K even in it's perihelion.
I guess that Sedna is the coldest (discovered) body in our Solar system.