Hollow Moon, eh?

[BigJim]

Somebody please wipe this site off the face of the Earth:

http://www.onelight.com/thei/hollowmoon.html

I HATE hollow moon theories.

Proof that the "ringing" of the moon is common knowledge in the scientific and NASA communities is presented in communications between Mission Control and the men aboard the Apollo 17 moon mission on December 29, 1972.

Several days after it splashed down.

"The moon has only 60% of the density of Earth. The improbable fact that an equal amount of earth material seemed to weigh almost twice as much as moon matter mystified everyone. Why the difference? The actual answer, some scientists felt, pointed to the possibility that part or all of the moon's interior was hollow!" (4)

Eh? Maybe it's just because you don't understand the Giant Impact theory.

Then there's a report in the July 1962

In 1959 eminent scientist

Before Apollo, before the ALSEP seismometers, before Lunar Orbiter, before Surveyor, before Ranger..... ah, help, I'm going to go insane if I spend one more day in "Lunar Conspiracies".... how do you guys maintain your sanity?

Professor Iosif Shklovsky put forth his findings in relation to the "moons" circling Mars. "After carefully weighing up the evidence he concludes that they are both hollow"

For a time there seemed to be observational evidence that Phobos may have been hollow, but this was later proven mistaken. Irrelevant to Luna anyway.

While some "orthodox" scientists will quietly admit that some earthly bodies are probably hollow,

I do not know any respectable scientist who entertains the notion of any naturally hollow body.

....."orthodox" scientists .... steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that ALL planets and moons are NATURALLY hollow and hurry to add they must be "artificial" satellites.

Of course they do. That idea is, if I may say so, just plain stupid. A 17 on the Bart scale. How would internal heat be stored? How would volcanism happen? What about outgassing? How would planets form? Why would all bodies be formed in that way? The simplest answer is often correct, and this is just ridiculous. Why don't we see exit holes on the opposite sides of large craters? Why aren't planets incredibly dense, then, to have all of their mass in the crust? Ahhhh...... I'm melting in irrationality.

For instance:
"The moon seems to be a comparatively light world in contrast with the planet Earth. The fact that the moon is only about 60% as dense as our planet has led scientists to two theories: that the moon is without an iron core, and/or, that it is partially hollow.

And I thought that it was because of the Big Impact theory, that the Moon is made of low density crustal/mantle material......

It doesn't have an iron core, anyway, as far as I know.

Once again, the "establishment" scientists are trying to "fit" the facts to their "sacred cow" theory. In no way will they "buck" the system and admit the obvious. The facts, once again, support the theory laid out by Gardner and Reed all heavenly bodies are hollow.

What? You have about 4 or 5 paragraphs there, and you claim your burden of proof and your burden of viability is satisfied? Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous.
Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous.


CrenshawDG@aol.com is the author. He also entertains the notion that the earth is hollow. Somebody e-mail him, or I'll go insane. The stuff that can get on the 'Net....

[Jigsaw]

[brings BigJim a cold beer and a wet rag to put on his forehead]

[BigJim]

[Rubs wet rag on body, goes back to website, wondering why such people have such ideas.]

[Vermonter]

What's the point for people trying to prove that the Earth/Moon is hollow?

To say such an extraordinary thing requires extraordinary evidence. There is a reason orthodox scientists reject the idea of a hollow Earth/Moon: Based on facts that we have collected and laws that have been proven time and time again, it cannot happen.

Now, if the Moon had a series of natural catacombs throughout, I would accept that if there was evidence backing it up.

You can't have a hollow sphere of that size without some unusual circumstances going on (like magic or ultra-tech science). It would collapse on itself and form a smaller sphere.

Science holds true. Orthodox don't accept crank theories because they have no basis in the reality that everyone else is living in.

[TriangleMan]

[Rubs wet rag on body, goes back to website, wondering why such people have such ideas.]

There was a brief discussion of it a couple of months ago on this thread

[kilopi]

Somebody please wipe this site off the face of the Earth:

http://www.onelight.com/thei/hollowmoon.html

Now, if we did that, who'd be reporting the following, from that site:

In a scientific editorial in The New York Times published on October 21, 1947 we learn;

Magnetic Trinity

" This military study of the polar regions has unexpectedly supplied us with new information on terrestrial magnetism. Observers of the Royal Air Force found that the North Magnetic Poles lies 300 miles north-northwest of its charted position. These findings have not only been confirmed by American Army pilots but have been supplemented with the information there are three magnetic poles in the area 450 miles long by nearly 200 miles wide." (7)

Priceless.

[JayUtah]

how do you guys maintain your sanity?

Well, every so often I drive downtown and look at the moon rock. Yes, we have one.

Then I drive out to where there's an old SR-71 airframe. I run my hand down the titanium flank and imagine it streaking over the Soviet Union at Mach who-knows-what. And I keep in mind that the intellectual tradition in which I operate is the one that built the aeronautical marvels that make these observations possible.

What great marvels of science and engineering have the conspiracists brought forth? What life-saving ingenuity have they brought to bear on the world's problems? As we used to say where I grew up, the conspiracists are "all hat and no cattle." When it's all said and done, I'll go back to improving people's lives, and they'll go back to trying to hawk their self-serving theories.

[Glom]

F****** A, Bubba.