Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 36

Thread: Will PNG solve the HBer question?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,348

    Will PNG solve the HBer question?

    We all know how the lossy compression that is JPEG has prompted the growth of many an HBer. PNG is a lossless compression, one that is in fact more effective than JPEG anyway. As things move over to PNG, should we see less of the old anomalies coming up?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    4,263
    Probably not because they are already out there and will continue to be milked by people like Hoagland.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,182
    No, they will convert the JPEG to PNG and claim that still there are artefacts.
    I can already see the 30 page thread in which we try to explain that converting the garbage JPEG into PNG does not work and that it has to be converted to PNG from the original uncompressed file...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,592
    Or they'll claim that the artefacts were removed in the PNG files and the JPEG files are the ones we should be analysing....

  5. #5
    Most spacecraft release their data in uncompressd, calibrated, IMG format. However - due to onboard compression one is still able, sometimes, to see compression artifacts in these calibrated pieces.

    Face facts - a true member of the hoaglanderati will never stop trying to find nonsense at the limits of resolution.

    Doug

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    151
    I wouldn't worry. There are plenty of opportunities for misinterpreting images, even when they're stored in a lossless format

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    13,423
    Yeah im still laughing about the "tracked vehicles" and "lichen growth" found by some. If anything i think that will be used to claim that their "discoveries are More Accurate" as noone can claim its just an Artifact of compression anymore. They will see whatever they want to see, whether its a pile of rocks, some ice, or a compression artifact.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,653
    Tracked Vehicles and Lichen growth? Try rock sheep....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    13,423
    Rock sheep?!?!

    It's time to put my plan into action...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    3,359
    I liked the Moon Dinosaur best

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,653

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northern Utah
    Posts
    5,194
    [HBMode]Uhh hellllooooo... PNG is the default file type for photoshop, so anything that's in that format has been altered.[/HBMode]

    I don't think it will solve anything.
    I'm Not Evil.
    An evil person would do the things that pop into my head.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    Quote Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
    When I first saw that guy's rock images I really thought it was a joke. It took awhile before I realized he really did think there were Martian rock sheep, apes in suits. coins, little pyramids, insects, fossilized stingrays, and all manner of other made objects or creatures in those images.

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,281
    Question:

    What is the PNG you all speak of? I never heard of it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,307
    It's a graphical file format which is used when quality of images is important. Since JPG is a lossy compression format it's great for use in environments where quality is not an issue but storage space or transmission latency is an issue (like the Internet), but pretty lousy if you want to ANALYZE an image with computer tools, so PNG is a standard format for such circumstances...
    Last edited by Sigma_Orionis; 2007-Jan-29 at 09:33 PM. Reason: Editted for clarity

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    35,276
    \HB mode\
    I'm sure NASA and the evil govment just came up with PNG to hide THE TRUTH!

    Seriously, people "see" all kinds of things (UFOs and such in the clouds, for example) directly with their eyes, with no compression losses at all. I suspect HBers will be finding sheep and starfish among the rocks on Mars.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Swift View Post
    \HB mode\
    I'm sure NASA and the evil govment just came up with PNG to hide THE TRUTH!

    Seriously, people "see" all kinds of things (UFOs and such in the clouds, for example) directly with their eyes, with no compression losses at all. I suspect HBers will be finding sheep and starfish among the rocks on Mars.
    Heh heh heh, that of course means that the whole Open Source movement is controlled by the Evil Illuminati/Alien Lizards/Templar Knights what-have-you.......

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,283
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigma_Orionis View Post
    Heh heh heh, that of course means that the whole Open Source movement is controlled by the Evil Illuminati/Alien Lizards/Templar Knights what-have-you.......
    Been listening to Bill Gates, have we?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Matherly View Post
    Been listening to Bill Gates, have we?
    Not really, just to Steven Balmer
    Last edited by Sigma_Orionis; 2007-Jan-30 at 03:48 PM. Reason: Editted for clarity

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    14,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Thompson View Post
    Or they'll claim that the artefacts were removed in the PNG files and the JPEG files are the ones we should be analysing....
    Or that PNG really stands for "Protecting a Neutral Government" and that it was actually designed to automatically detect and electronically cover up any artifacts, even if converted from the original negatives...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,307
    Hmmmm, IIRC THAT PNG was developed by the Undisclosed Government Agency which of course also handles the MIBs and is the Secret Government (TM) office that handles all Extraterrestial Affairs (including the "we will welcome our new Evil Orion Overlords Masters" treaty with Alpha Orionis......) and yes Steven Ballmer is one of them

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigma_Orionis View Post
    It's a graphical file format which is used when quality of images is important. Since JPG is a lossy compression format it's great for use in environments where quality is not an issue but storage space or transmission latency is an issue (like the Internet), but pretty lousy if you want to ANALYZE an image with computer tools, so PNG is a standard format for such circumstances...
    The w3c recommends PNG over GIF. I've certainly found that PNG's give higher quality images in smaller files. According to Wikipedia, as far as JPEG goes, it's better for photo type stuff, when you want the image a reasonable size, but PNG is better for images with text. I prepared a flowchart for my boss on Visio and then produced a JPEG and PNG from it. The PNG was slightly smaller with a higher quality.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,307
    The reason PNG is preferred over GIF (originally anyways) is that Unisys (which holds the patent on the Lempel-Ziv Algorithm) started to charge royalties over the use of LZ (which is used by GIF), so as a response PNG was developed. Since those days GIF is becoming less and less used and a lot of development effort has gone into PNG so I am not surprised that nowadays PNG is technically superior to GIF.


    Editted to add: Actually Unisys owns the patent on a VARIANT of LZ which is called LZW and that is the compression used by GIF
    Last edited by Sigma_Orionis; 2007-Feb-07 at 03:22 PM. Reason: Editted for Clarity

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    642
    Well, PNG is a losless compression which works up to 48-bit colors, whilst GIF can support (only) 256 colors and JPEG is lossy. It doesn't suprise me that a losless format that supports transparency is becoming more interesting than the other two. Of course, PNG isn't as supported as the other two.

    In short, PNG seems to be the ideal image format; despite that I often use GIF images too, when I use less than 256 different colors.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,417
    PNG is a better format for synthetic graphics such as buttons, backgrounds, and other bitmap graphics that typically incorporate into web design.

    JPEG is still a better format for encoding natural photography, as a reasonable compromize between fidelity and image size. Strictly speaking, DCT compression is lossy. JPEG (or more properly, JFIF) files are not required to use that compression method, or any compression method. But DCT compression works well for natural photography. Lossless compressors are within the JPEG standard, although they are not widely used. JPEG is used synonymously with JFIF interchange standards and with the DCT compression.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,348
    Quote Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
    PNG is a better format for synthetic graphics such as buttons, backgrounds, and other bitmap graphics that typically incorporate into web design.

    JPEG is still a better format for encoding natural photography, as a reasonable compromize between fidelity and image size. Strictly speaking, DCT compression is lossy. JPEG (or more properly, JFIF) files are not required to use that compression method, or any compression method. But DCT compression works well for natural photography. Lossless compressors are within the JPEG standard, although they are not widely used. JPEG is used synonymously with JFIF interchange standards and with the DCT compression.
    That's what I said. I originally used gif's for the next/prev buttons on my website. Since I started using CSS buttons, I made a version with a gold effect backdrop to the image for hovering, to make it look nice. I first used gif and it looked crude. Then I changed to png. Not only did it look better, but the file was smaller.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,417
    I'm not at all surprised. GIF implements transparency as a "magic" color index that applies wholly to a pixel. PNG, I believe, uses an actual alpha channel so that a pixel may be partly transparent.

    For very small images (e.g., web site buttons) any gain achieved through compression is frequently lost -- and then some -- to overhead for the compressor.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,348
    On that note, how do you put in transparency?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,417
    The paint programs I use (Photoshop, GIMP) allow you to specify the background when creating new documents -- specifically they allow "transparent" as one of the choices. Then if you configure all your tools to use anti-aliasing, the alpha channel should preserve partial transparency at the edges of your painting.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    11,219
    What hardware is required to use "alpha channel"? I have an old
    computer and video card, but I do have it set to 32 bits. That is
    24-bit color, and the remaining 8 bits are apparently unused. I do
    not have photoshop or any other graphics program which deals
    with alpha channel. I have made PNG images with the same kind
    of transparency GIFs allow. I suspect that some Flash animations
    I see use alpha channel, possibly via DirectX. The version of
    DirectX I have is 6.1a (4.06.03.0518).

    -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
    http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

Similar Threads

  1. A Newbie Needs Help Answering HBer...
    By bassguy61 in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 2011-Mar-10, 07:51 PM
  2. Arguing an HBer on another forum
    By Swordfish in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 2007-Jul-26, 11:16 PM
  3. questions from an HBer
    By JonClarke in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2007-Mar-22, 06:46 PM
  4. HBer numbers
    By Excelsior in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 2004-Oct-08, 09:58 PM
  5. HBer annoyances revisited
    By Glom in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 2004-May-13, 06:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •