Watch and learn! Moon is fake!
Watch and learn! Moon is fake!
Footage from "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way to the Moon," eh? And here I thought it would be something new.
So-called "seagull posting" is frowned upon here. Besides that, this is handily debunked at Clavius:
The Moon is fake? That's one heck of an illusion the universe has been foisting upon us for all this time.Watch and learn! Moon is fake!
Heeh, I actually haven't seen it before. So to me it was new.
And yes, the moon is fake. I read it in a book, so it must be true. But wait - what's a segull-posting?
I need to reassess all the knowledge and experiences of my last 50 years to bring them into line with these new claims.
OK, I just did.
So, nichts, what what else is new?
how... does.. this... click.. for.. people.
it's just so.. SO wrong.
Yup, sure can. It's the part about how the astronauts did the sophisticated fake shots of the earth while in orbit by useing sophisticated cardboard, taped over the windows.
In other news: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061210.html A bit of sloppy wording on APOD's part. I don't think Schmidt was 'running'. They should know that he was most likely doing the moon walk
loap... lop... lopp...hop and it only looks like he's running. tsk tsk I guess they don't keep the moon hoaxers in mind when writting these articles.
at first the astronaughts were running, but it was difficult and innefficient. and they very quickly developed that moon hop that is so famous.
so for a few steps the guy decided to do an innefficient and somewhat difficult mode of locomotion. he's on the friggin moon, how often do you get to play around with that?
Astronaut, not astronaught. There is no gh in the word.
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Yeah. There's no gh in TEAM.
Seems to me that you wouldn't have much traction
Well on Apollo 12, the crew stated that it was a constant battle, but after a while you'd sort of get used to it, especially having to stop before you were at where you were going, or else the momentum would just take you right on past (apparently, on Apollo 11, Buzz found this out the hard way when he ran right past the item he'd gone to get.) They also found that the dust was "slippery" and so traction was sometimes a problem.
This Bart Sibrel smoking gun is ...uhm, neither smoking nor gun.
If you just watch the video without Sibrel narration you would simply never come to the conclusion that this was an "earth-faking" in process.
So the narration simply makes push - to make you see something that it is not.
In fact I can take the video and narate it any way I wish, I can even claim these are mongolian immigrants in submarine planting their own opium crop. It would witstand scrutiny as much as Sibrels version.
That's the problem with HB, they always go for push or narration that is otherwise not obvious. They want visual clues, but hoaxes are hardly dependent on visual clues.
In reply to MaDeR:
oh, guess I got to reply. i was too buisy laughing I love the "this photo from NASA is similar to this admittedly cg (star trek) part. tee-hee!