Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: GR and the Universe

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,066
    Quote Originally Posted by MN
    Thank you for all you have taught me RussT. Gravity is both dark matter
    and dark energy. I wouldn't have found it without your help. You are so
    right about things being what they should be.
    Again Michael, you are Welcome!

    But, you need to keep rereading numerous of my posts to get the full reality of what some of these things mean.

    Here are a few for-instances...

    [The search for dark matter and also dark energy is over.]

    No, it is not over, it has begun and still needs to procede!

    They must identify a Planck elementary particle...a ['Planck mass inert Non-baryonic dark matter'].

    The trick then will be to understand what that really means.

    I am by no means a Quantum Particles Physics expert!!! But, it appears to me that the Higgs Ocean and The Neutrino Sea, CDM, and HDM, and Strings (which are the actual gravitons) (String Theoty thinks it is a particle theory, but the Strings are actually ['Planck mass inert Non-baryonic dark matter'], 'space', are all the same thing!


    [That is why we can't find it. It is gravity pulling us outwards evenly.
    Gravity balances add it to the 4% matter and you don't need dark matter.
    It is also stretching the universe.]



    And this...

    [It is gravity pulling us outwards evenly.]

    This is tricky, but actually 'space' is just expanding, and it is being added to each of the voids continually, which means the space between the galaxy clusters is expanding, which would actually give the *appearance* that the expanding space was 'pushing' the the clusters farther apart.

    [It is also stretching the universe]

    This gives the impression that the universe is being 'diluted'...it is just that more 'space' is being added to the universe, continuously, in all the Voids.
    Last edited by RussT; 2006-Oct-30 at 09:04 AM.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,712

    Smile A tight fit

    When you say space is being added and that we need to look for a
    particle. What if that space has no room to expand? This is what I mean by pressure.
    There is Planck mass inert Non-baryonic dark matter being added.

    I simplified things down to much with two way links, got into big trouble.
    But think of a balloon being blown up deep under the ocean. It has to hold out the
    pressure of the water.What if the hyperspace that we are trying to expand into
    just has no give. We add space and see out universe treat that space as it should, it expands
    outwards relative to us only.

    I try to think laterally it gets me into a lot of bother.

    I figured gravity has a duality that add it to matter and it gets heavier and matter shrinks less than the voids as they get heavier. Space expands but we are not inflating outwards.

    Add enough space to our system and we buckle, where is the weakest point. Will the Planck mass inert Non-baryonic dark matter add more mass to matter or will the void convert some of what we read as dark energy into substance more dense than energy. Matter erupting from the voids.

    As I said in the void at a certain distance in although there is nothing in there but due to the gravity of vibration there is an immense pressure.

    We are fixed floating at a depth held in 'seeing' the change reading it physically watching the stars take on strange orbits until the burst comes from within our universe regardless of whether we are binary or infinity linked.

    Cheers

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,066
    Quote Originally Posted by MN
    When you say space is being added and that we need to look for a
    particle.
    Ahh, a question.

    Yes, DM is made of 'something' that is collisionless, Non-Baryonic, and Planck size!

    I am saying that 'all' of 'space' is made of this DM and that it is taveling at "C"!

    So that Background Gravity Field (BGF) traveling at "C" is not lethal to SR.

    I'll be happy to answer any questions you have of my model, because the way you are changing things around in your thread, shows that you didn't take me very seriously when I said that changing things up like that makes things soooooooo inconsistent and that kind of hypothicating is ,well, just guessing.

Similar Threads

  1. Could our present universe be embedded within a larger universe?
    By potoole in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2012-Jun-18, 01:46 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2012-Jun-04, 02:20 AM
  3. Acceleration of the expansion of the Universe and open Universe?
    By cosmos0 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2011-Jul-26, 02:51 PM
  4. Universe Older than 13.7 and Previous Epochs in the Universe??
    By mmaayeh in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2010-Nov-23, 11:19 AM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2004-Jul-24, 09:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •