View Poll Results: Which is most pratical

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Faster than light

    2 14.29%
  • Near light sub light

    9 64.29%
  • Mind transfer

    3 21.43%
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Which Interstellar Travel Is Most Practical?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    625

    Which Interstellar Travel Is Most Practical?

    Assuming that we someday can travel to the stars, Which type of method do you think is most practical? That is, the one that you think can really be done.

  2. #2

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by SAMU View Post
    Assuming that we someday can travel to the stars, Which type of method do you think is most practical? That is, the one that you think can really be done.
    I've Always Thought The BEST Method Would Be By Marrying a NAFAL (Nearly as Fast as Light) Drive to a C-T (Continuous-Time) Drive ...

    That Way, you'd Thiink you Arrived Soon After you Left, and The People There Would Agree With you, Although they Wouldn't Actually See your Departure for Another "t" Years ...

    Essentially The Way it Would Work, Is The C-T Drive Would Swap a Tiime Dimension for One of Space, And The Ship Would Simply Accelerate Upon it Towards NAFAL Speeds, Without Ever Actually Moving Along The Timelike Space Dimension!

    So, What Do you Guys Thiink, Plausible?

  3. #3
    If by mind transfer you mean sending infomation via electromagnetic radiation (radio waves, laser, etc.) then dumping that program into a computer or a robotic or cloned body, that sounds the easiest and not too far from what we can do today. We like to pretend we're complex but the fact is that as long as you have enough general knowledge on hand, a couple of pages of infomation should be enough to recreate someone well enough so that only close friends or familly could really tell the difference.

    Perhaps we could shoot pea sized probes at a near by star system at 10% the speed of light with a powerful accelerator. When they approach the system they use a tiny antimatter drive to deaccelerate, constantly repairing any radiation damage they suffer. Finally a grain of sand sized speck lands on an asteroid or other body and starts building systems for energy collection and material processing. Eventually the probe has enough resources to build a radio reciever. It can use this to download infomation, instructions and people and go on to construct bodies and facilities for people if they are required.

  4. #4

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
    If by mind transfer you mean sending infomation via electromagnetic radiation (radio waves, laser, etc.) then dumping that program into a computer or a robotic or cloned body, that sounds the easiest and not too far from what we can do today. We like to pretend we're complex but the fact is that as long as you have enough general knowledge on hand, a couple of pages of infomation should be enough to recreate someone well enough so that only close friends or familly could really tell the difference.

    Perhaps we could shoot pea sized probes at a near by star system at 10% the speed of light with a powerful accelerator. When they approach the system they use a tiny antimatter drive to deaccelerate, constantly repairing any radiation damage they suffer. Finally a grain of sand sized speck lands on an asteroid or other body and starts building systems for energy collection and material processing. Eventually the probe has enough resources to build a radio reciever. It can use this to download infomation, instructions and people and go on to construct bodies and facilities for people if they are required.
    Ah Yes, Travel Through Teleportation ...

    Personally, While I Thiink REAL Matter Transport Will Hafta Be The Norm at Fiirst ...

    Ultimately, Unless The System has Absolutely No Raw Materials, In Which Case Why Bother, Who'll Have The Tiime to Do Anythiing, But?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    471
    A small problem with mind transfer is that you need to errr.. dispose of the original afterwards. Even if you do that it wouldn't be real travel because you, the master copy so to speak, do not go anywhere. You stay firmly on the transmitter's end of things while your perfect copy crawls out of the receiver. It is mind duplication, followed by transfer of the newly created person. But it is not yourself that travels. You are disposed. Killed. Volunteers? Anybody?

  6. #6

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Cugel View Post
    A small problem with mind transfer is that you need to errr.. dispose of the original afterwards. Even if you do that it wouldn't be real travel because you, the master copy so to speak, do not go anywhere. You stay firmly on the transmitter's end of things while your perfect copy crawls out of the receiver. It is mind duplication, followed by transfer of the newly created person. But it is not yourself that travels. You are disposed. Killed. Volunteers? Anybody?
    SURE ...

    As for The Killing Part, Fahgettaboutit ...

    If I Don't Have at Least One of me On Every Inhabited Planet, I'm Not Half Trying!


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,369
    Missed one:

    D. None of the above.

    At least not for the forseeable future.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    471
    Quote Originally Posted by ZaphodBeeblebrox View Post
    SURE ...

    As for The Killing Part, Fahgettaboutit ...

    If I Don't Have at Least One of me On Every Inhabited Planet, I'm Not Half Trying!

    Nahhhh... that would be... overkill!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
    Missed one:

    D. None of the above.

    At least not for the forseeable future.

    No I didn't miss that one. That is covered by:


    Quote Originally Posted by SAMU View Post
    Assuming that we someday can travel to the stars,

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    773
    IMO, it will be many generations (probably many centuries) before we get a technology that could transport humans to another star system in a timeframe that is semi-reasonable compared to a human lifespan (lets say 15 years one-way). In the mean time, the best we could hope for would be probes sent out at speeds that are a tiny fraction of the speed of light in hopes that they would still be functioning hundreds or thousands of years later when they reached their destinations. In fact, it would be likely that probes/ships launched later on with presumably better propulsion would overtake the older probes and actually arrive first.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    Quote Originally Posted by SAMU View Post
    No I didn't miss that one. That is covered by:
    Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
    Missed one:

    D. None of the above.

    At least not for the forseeable future.
    No I didn't miss that one. That is covered by:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SAMU View Post
    Assuming that we someday can travel to the stars,
    Not true. Your options were:

    Faster than light

    This appears to be impossible.

    Near light sub light

    This may be physically possible, but it would be very energy intensive. It is most likely that starflight would be at some small fraction of the speed of light, not near the speed of light.

    Mind transfer

    Even granting that this would become feasible, how do you do a mind transfer without sending a "receiver" first? So, this too would be impossible in itself.

    The option I would pick as most practical would be star travel at a small fraction of the speed of light.

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,369
    Quote Originally Posted by SAMU View Post
    No I didn't miss that one. That is covered by:
    Gotcha, mark me for near sublight. I'd love to be wrong, but somehow I get the feeling Mr. Einstein trapped us rather nicely this side of c.

  13. #13

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
    Gotcha, mark me for near sublight. I'd love to be wrong, but somehow I get the feeling Mr. Einstein trapped us rather nicely this side of c.
    Yeah ...

    That's Why I Thiink Time-Bending Will Become a Useful Technology, a Lot Sooner ...

    So, Should I Start a Thread Asking Which, If Either, Will Likely Be Developed First?


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by ZaphodBeeblebrox View Post
    SURE ...

    As for The Killing Part, Fahgettaboutit ...

    If I Don't Have at Least One of me On Every Inhabited Planet, I'm Not Half Trying!

    I am agreeing with you. I know that I have thousands of copies of some of my stuff on this planet alone.

    But how can we keep all those bloodthirsty ones above from deleting our copies? I guess we'll have to be interesting enough that somebody is willing to support our copies with hardware and wetware and defend them against malicious attackers. I do find it discouraging that what I think is the most practical method, mind transfer, has only one vote, my own.

  15. #15

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by SAMU View Post
    I am agreeing with you. I know that I have thousands of copies of some of my stuff on this planet alone.

    But how can we keep all those bloodthirsty ones above from deleting our copies? I guess we'll have to be interesting enough that somebody is willing to support our copies with hardware and wetware and defend them against malicious attackers. I do find it discouraging that what I think is the most practical method, mind transfer, has only one vote, my own.
    Eh ...

    Even in The MOST Blase of Societies, I Suspect Killing a Cloned Body Will Still Be Classed as Murder ...

    At The Very Least, Because There'll Be No Appreciable Way of Telling The Difference!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    Quote Originally Posted by ZaphodBeeblebrox View Post
    Yeah ...

    That's Why I Thiink Time-Bending Will Become a Useful Technology, a Lot Sooner ...

    So, Should I Start a Thread Asking Which, If Either, Will Likely Be Developed First?

    What do you mean by "time bending"? Cryonic suspension? Hibernation?

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  17. #17

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
    What do you mean by "time bending"? Cryonic suspension? Hibernation?
    DIRECT Alteration Along The Tiime Axis ...

    Not So Muuch Time-Travel, as That Is Pretty Muuch Prohibited By Reletivity, But More, Transitions to Alternate Focal Points of Now ...

    So, Which Would Be Fiirst, Interstellar Travel or a Time Warp Sufficient to Alter your Participation in The Present?


  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    Quote Originally Posted by ZaphodBeeblebrox View Post
    DIRECT Alteration Along The Tiime Axis ...

    Not So Muuch Time-Travel, as That Is Pretty Muuch Prohibited By Reletivity, But More, Transitions to Alternate Focal Points of Now ...
    Ok, so you're talking magic/new physics.

    So, Which Would Be Fiirst, Interstellar Travel or a Time Warp Sufficient to Alter your Participation in The Present?

    I won't comment on unknown physics, but we have the first - the Pioneer 10, 11 and Voyager 1,2. That is, something going far below the speed of light. Getting to a near star in several tens of thousands of years is possible. Getting there usefully will have to wait. Energy requirements at 1% of the speed of light and above starts getting substantial for large masses, but you probably need to go at least that fast to make sense on human time scales.

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  19. #19

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
    Ok, so you're talking magic/new physics.
    HOPEFULLY Not Magic ...

    But Yeah, it'd Be Well Beyond Cutting Edge ...

    Still, Loopholes in Relativity Theory Would Seem to Allow it, But it Looks Liike Quantum Mechanics May Disallow it Instead!

    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
    I won't comment on unknown physics, but we have the first - the Pioneer 10, 11 and Voyager 1,2. That is, something going far below the speed of light. Getting to a near star in several tens of thousands of years is possible. Getting there usefully will have to wait. Energy requirements at 1% of the speed of light and above starts getting substantial for large masses, but you probably need to go at least that fast to make sense on human time scales.
    True, Not Enough for My Tastes, But True ...

    However, Assuming The Chronology Protection Conjecture Either Turns Out to Be Complete Handwavium or at Best a Surmountable Obstacle ...

    Do you Thiink we'll Explore These Ramifications of M-Theory, Before or After we Fiirst Get to The Stars Through Other Means?


  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    471
    Well you know, it takes multiple scientific revolutions at the most fundamental level before anything of this becomes remotely possible. And you can't predict scientific revolutions, they just fall out of the blue sky (or they don't). But I do know one thing. It takes someone blissfully optimistic, stubborn and completely shortsighted and likely under 25 of age to come up with these sort of discoveries. Even if it won't take us to the stars, any progress is welcome!

Similar Threads

  1. Ep. 146: Interstellar Travel
    By Fraser in forum Astronomy Cast
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2009-Aug-16, 03:20 PM
  2. Ep. 145: Interstellar Travel
    By Fraser in forum Astronomy Cast
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2009-Jul-29, 06:20 AM
  3. Interstellar Travel!!!
    By Antimatterlad in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 2008-Sep-02, 02:37 AM
  4. Interstellar travel
    By samsara15 in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 2004-Sep-29, 02:53 PM
  5. interstellar travel?
    By Kebsis in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 2004-Feb-27, 11:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •