Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Answers please..

  1. #1

    Answers please..

    Was there an IRC meeting this week? If so, does someone have the link? I need a good laugh

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    293
    http://www.skepticalmind.com/zetatal...k_irclogs.html

    These logs are more complete than the ones on Nancy's site.



    Girl 101

  3. #3
    Does Nancy edit her logs then? Has anyone checked? :-?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    424
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenhalgh
    Does Nancy edit her logs then? Has anyone checked? :-?
    Yes. You don't see folks being kicked and so forth on her logs.

    NOW -- in all fairness, people do edit logs when posting them publicly particularly if there's a lot of irrelevant chat. I haven't checked for that. I do know that she doesn't post raw (unedited) logs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    293
    She mostly edits out who gets kicked off. I find that really funny, personally.

    Last weeks (not this last one, but the log before) she inserted all this extra stuff into it about her Iraq War predictions that isn't on the skepticalmind site.

    Also, I like going to skepticalmind so her stat logs will show that's where she got traffic from.

    Girl 101

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    554
    In the logs, Nancy states the following about PX:

    <NancyL> Bobob, none, and the Red Persona was as large as my thumb, held up, and diffuse, an orange smudge, VERY unique.

    Is she saying that PX is that big as (roughly) a degree, or I am reading that wrong? And she is the only one who can see this monster star in the sky?
    She says to look at dawn ... but that wouldn't be a great time to look towards Aldeb ... isn't it below the western horizon by then?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    292
    The other things that Skeptical Mind leaves in, and Nancy's website edits is the talk before and after the 'official' zetatalk chat....sometimes that is more interesting than the actual zetatalk.....especially when Nancy comes early or stays to 'debate' ...

  8. #8
    OK, i didn't understand much of what she was saying. A lot about earthquakes and red dust in england apparently, thou I can verify there's none in Kent!

    Can someone take this into bitesize pieces and walk me throu what she's saying and why it's wrong.. always makes me feel a lot better!

    Ooh, the coverup of earthquakes is a new one.. verrrrry interesting! :wink:

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    992

    Hmmmm......

    Well, if you visit www.zetatalk.com and click on the POLE SHIFT link and the TRANSFORMATION link and a few others if you have time to waste, some of this will sort of make sense. Nancy is issuing signs that match what the Zetas have predicted will occur around the time of the shift, such as the red dust deal, which is "explained" here:

    http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p170.htm

    That link was reached via the POLE SHIFT link at zetatalk.

    She is just claiming things that match up to her previous pronouncements to reinforce the idea that she is always right, and right again!, as she likes to say.

    P.S. I would understand completely if you do not wish to wade through zetatalk. Just a little bit of it is usually enough to discourage most people.
    This one stopped me cold a while ago:

    http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s59.htm

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    293
    I can't stand the whole earthquake cover-up stuff. People saying there are more earthquakes now than 100 years ago or some silly stuff like that. I would listen to George Noory every once in a while and he would always say things like "Kinda interesting that there seems to be so many more earthquakes being reported these days..."

    There are "more earthquakes" because as every year that goes by, more equipment is being installed all over the world to monitor earthquakes. The equipment is more sensitive now than it was even 30 years ago, so more earthquakes are recorded. We hear about large earthquakes a lot - but if a large earthquake happened in China 80 years ago, do you think you would hear about it? Chances are it would be so remote that the news would never hit Anytown, USA.

    About 2 years ago, there was an earthquake swarm in Spokane, WA. I lived there for 14 years of my life, and in all the time there, we had one earthquake that had the chance to be felt. I think it was a 3. And it happened in the middle of the night. 2 years ago though, there were strange earthquakes that would last only a couple of seconds, and were accompanied by a large BANG. (My family still lives there and went through them). They were happening all the time for weeks, and then just stopped. Spokane is on a layer of Basalt Rock, and every hundred years or so, the Basalt re-settles itself, resulting in a few 4.0 and 3.0 earthquakes that do no damage. Spokane as far as I know is not on or near any fault line, so it is rare that they would get earthquakes. And having gone through many larger earthquakes myself - outside of Spokane, including a 6.8 (in an office building built on old waste material - which became liquefied during the earthquake, therefore making it feel more like a 7+), "normal" earthquakes don't act like that. But, I really really doubt that the earthquakes in Spokane 2 years ago, or a couple hundred years ago when they last happened had anything to do with Planet X. Nancy would lay claim to them as the result of PX if they had happened today and not years ago.

    Same with crazy weather, which will always be around so you can tell your grandkids all about the Blizzard of 03, or the heatwave of 03, or the temblor of 03. Earthquakes happen, sometimes in places with no fault line, sometimes in places where they haven't happened for hundreds of years. This is an alive rock we live on, and earthquakes and strange weather have been happening since there were human beings.

    But the Nancy crowd of doomsayers will attribute any late season winter storm or early heatwave, or earthquake to some planet that her alien friends have told her is coming - they've told her, remember, with implants they put her brain.

    Lord.

    Girl 101

  11. #11
    On another note, if you want the latest Quake seismographs from around the world, here's the link: http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2.shtml

    At time of posting, these readings are VERY quiet... surely they would be going haywire by now...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    2,344
    I don't know Greenhalgh, all that activity on the Anarctica site looks a lot like the beginning of a pole shift to me. :roll:
    Interesting site though.

  13. #13
    Yea, don't worry about that. It has always been like that. I checked a long time ago and it was doing loops all over the place. I remember contacting someone about it, thinking maybe the staff were playing football with it, but apparently its normal.

  14. #14
    This is a better link....

    http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/eqstats.html

    and this one has a nice grapth that includes 2003

    http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/graphs.html

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by ajax25
    This is a better link....

    http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/eqstats.html

    and this one has a nice grapth that includes 2003

    http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/graphs.html
    well clearly those obvious statistical outliers mean PX is coming right? :roll:

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    478
    But you can't trust those sites! Those are .gov sites, they're just supplying you with false information to cover up Planet X! :roll:

  17. #17
    Hmm... looks like the whole world and its wife are in on this grand conspiracy. My paycheck hasn't cleared this month though. Must be running low on funds. Ask Mr. Bush to up the budget on White House toilet roll spending to $4.6 billion: we need more covertly siphoned funds.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    2,683

    Re: Hmmmm......

    Quote Originally Posted by LTC8K6
    This one stopped me cold a while ago:

    http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s59.htm
    BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAAAAA!!!

    So the parabolic arc doesn't exist in Nancy's universe? Gravity can apparently just stop something dead in it's tracks and "suck" it down. Oh, that is just too rich.

    (fixed smileys)

Similar Threads

  1. Unwanted answers!
    By Solfe in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 2010-Aug-25, 05:52 PM
  2. Q&A Answers
    By Cougar in forum Forum Introductions and Feedback
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 2010-Aug-03, 07:52 AM
  3. Answers
    By JukriS in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 2007-Nov-17, 12:14 AM
  4. Snappy Answers
    By 94z07 in forum Fun-n-Games
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 2006-Sep-15, 12:55 PM
  5. answers in astronomy
    By msbs131960 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2006-Mar-01, 08:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •