An Email to Bart Sibrel I would like to share

[R.A.F.]

The significance is that Aldrin and Sibrel are not adversaries, but are actually cooperating.

Yeah...Sibrel's face "cooperated" with Buzz's fist...

[Van Rijn]

The punch sound actually comes after the visible punch on some versions of the video and the word "thief" is always heard after the blow is struck.

I disagree.

Looking at this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wcrkxOgzhU

I can see Aldrin raising his arm as Sibrel is saying "and a . . ." then a flurry of sound from Sibrel's microphone and Sibrel's head turning while Sibrel is saying "thief." The actual hit is out of view of the camera, of course.

If you look and listen carefully, you will note that a person could not actually do that, get hit full on in the face and then enunciate the word "thief" with perfect clarity.

He seems to be getting hit in the cheek, not a straight on shot. Also, Aldrin doesn't appear to be trying to knock Sibrel out, he's just frustrated and wants the Sibrel to back off. So I don't see why that would stop him from enunciating the word "thief."

The significance is that Aldrin and Sibrel are not adversaries, but are actually cooperating.

What would be the point of that? What would be the point of faking a punch?

It is a funny little modern proof that Apollo was fake and it goes a long way to show that a lot of energy continues to go into fooling the public.

And that makes no sense at all. But the style of argument is sounding strangely familiar.

[ClaudiaT]

The video you referenced is different. It seems sped up to me. I think you heed to do the experiment on your own Van Rijn. There is a lot of variety in the sounds and sights of the videos published. Do your own.

[Strange]

There is a lot of variety in the sounds and sights of the videos published.

If that is so, what makes you think that yours is more accurate than any other?

[goodnightsnookieukums]

Bart,

Thank-you for opening up the eyes of the world to the great moon hoax. As you have indicated in your moon movie, light casts parallel shadows across a surface. And, I might add, we are not fooled by the pro-NASA talk about "vanishing point" and "focal length".

I hope you continue your work to uncover the truth.

Why don't you do the right thing and apply the same notion to this photo:



It is taken from the government's web site showing that aid is being distributed in Iraq. Look at the angle of the shadow of the soldier compared to the angle of the two men in the distance.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/ir...essay4/05.html

Clearly this is a hoax, wouldn't you say?

Why not make your next project exposing that the war in Iraq or some part of it (humanitarian aid, etc) is a hoax. Why not? It would not offend any more government employees than your Apollo hoax expose'. I suggest you add this to your long list of your life's worth-while tasks. Or perhaps, I will distribute this idea in your behalf.

--Bill Thompson

P.S. Your argument that the Apollo misions were only witnessed by a few people is a lie. Radio Telescopes are precise pointing instruments and they were used all over the world to view the precise location of the missions going to the moon and coming down.

One of the other thread OPs claims there are editorialized versions of this attempting to show the punch was staged, where can I find a version of this?

[Clanger]

One of the other thread OPs claims there are editorialized versions of this attempting to show the punch was staged, where can I find a version of this?

I can help with this. There was this really mad poster who kept creating multiple sock accounts here there and everywhere. He basically came to the ever so ludicrous conclusion that Bart Sibrel was actually a disinfo plant, because in his "expert" opinion, it was impossible to say the word "thneeeeif" whilst being punched by elderly Apollo astronauts. For some strange reason only known to him, he took down many of his barking mad videos and disappeared for a while. He was an extremely weird person, possibly needing some assistance with his behaviour. Would you like me to put you in touch with him?

[JayUtah]

One of the other thread OPs claims there are editorialized versions of this attempting to show the punch was staged, where can I find a version of this?

Patrick Tekeli claims this on YouTube. That's the only place I recall the argument having been made. "Totallycooldude" or something like that.

[Clanger]

Patrick Tekeli claims this on YouTube. That's the only place I recall the argument having been made. "Totallycooldude" or something like that.

Claimed. He took them all down. Totallystokeddude. Though personally I would find a much more appropriate adjective than that

[Gillianren]

Of course, there's also The Daily Show, which used his own techniques to show that it wasn't possible. But that was The Daily Show.

[goodnightsnookieukums]

Patrick Tekeli claims this on YouTube. That's the only place I recall the argument having been made. "Totallycooldude" or something like that.

Did not find it on YouTube but did find a version on another system. Much thanks for the help.

[Buzz-Lite-Punch]

The punch sound actually comes after the visible punch on some versions of the video and the word "thief" is always heard after the blow is struck. If you look and listen carefully, you will note that a person could not actually do that, get hit full on in the face and then enunciate the word "thief" with perfect clarity. Try it for yourself Van Rijn. The significance is that Aldrin and Sibrel are not adversaries, but are actually cooperating. It is a funny little modern proof that Apollo was fake and it goes a long way to show that a lot of energy continues to go into fooling the public. The fake Apollo landings were the most import important events of the 20th century.

Maybe the sound dropped out of sync these things do happen once in while but still the Buzz-Lite-Punch on Barts chops is still priceless.

You get away from me.

Walloppppppppppp.