Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 91 to 120 of 143

Thread: North Korea launches missile

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    6,197
    Quote Originally Posted by korjik
    I dunno if this is going into politics. I am trying to show motive.
    I think the motive is quite simple: Rattle some sabers to frighten the US so the US will send North Korea lots of money and free stuff so they will stop rattling the sabers. It’s like that old movie, “The Mouse that Roared,” about a small poor European country that declared war on the US so the US would send them lots of foreign aid money to bribe them into not having a war with the US.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam5
    I think the motive is quite simple: Rattle some sabers to frighten the US so the US will send North Korea lots of money and free stuff so they will stop rattling the sabers. It’s like that old movie, “The Mouse that Roared,” about a small poor European country that declared war on the US so the US would send them lots of foreign aid money to bribe them into not having a war with the US.
    I meant motive as to why the missile would only fly 40s

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,031
    Actually, the funny part about the movie, "The Mouse That Roared" was their plan on declaring war on the US so they could get foreign aid after they were defeated. Only, they won! I have not seen the movie for a long time but I remember it was very funny.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    4,139
    Quote Originally Posted by jkmccrann
    With regards to these missile tests, I find it interesting that the Taepodong 2 missile is assumed to have failed, given that it plunged into the East Sea 40s or so after launching.

    It makes me wonder, what would be the criteria for that missile test not to have been deemed a failure? If it had flown over Japan would that have been a success? If it had landed in the mid-Pacific near Hawaii perhaps would that have been deemed a non-failure?

    What criteria are being used to judge the success or otherwise of the missile?
    The fact that the missile is a multi-stage one, and the apparent failure/abort happened during the burn of the first stage.

    Pike, formerly of FAS, and currently of globalsecurity.org (a regular of the rent-a-quote crowd), suggested that it may have been due to excessive stresses on the body during the maximum thrust part of the first stage burn. He raises the possibility that the first stage had been light-weighted, and possibly weakened, in order to extend the overall range of the missile. Then again, this is purely speculation.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    760
    Quote Originally Posted by mickal555
    Would a long range missle reach australia from korea?

    I hope they don't decide to shoot us...

    I have much to say politicly... I'll just stay quiet here though....
    The pictures the news was showing had the long range missile being able to hit most of Asia and the west coast of the states, but Australia was beyond it's range.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    841
    Here's the picture with the missile ranges:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-paci...6464.stm#there


    I would have thougth Australia was (a lot)closer to N Korea than Finland. Obviously not...

  7. #97
    Quote Originally Posted by kg034
    Satellites? According to the link below, its more like just one spy satellite.


    Putin Wants More Russian Satellites In Space
    Like the Death Star, the failure of the recently launched Cosmos-2421 may have been exaggerated, and the satellite is in fact fully functional.

    The Russian Space Forces will launch the military satellite Cosmos-2422, aboard a Molniya-M launcher from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in July.
    The satellite is part of an early-warning system consisting of two US-KS satellites, Cosmos-2388 and Cosmos-2393, and the geostationary satellite Cosmos-2379 of the US-KMO system.

    (i have read elsewhere that the total Russian satellite group presently has about 100 satellites, whereas the US orbital group consists of about 425 satellites. )

    Incidentally, the US, has four DSP geostationary satellites, looking at North Korea (and Australia etc) - DSP F-21 at 70°E, DSP F-22 at 130°E, DSP F-18 at 145°E, and DSP F-17 at 165°W; this was augmented by the recently launched NROL-22, (and no doubt a few others we don`t have the clearance to know about...)

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    858
    Here is the KCNA (North Korea's news agency) article about the launches. It looks like the use of the T2 was not part of any attempted space launch.

    The latest successful missile launches were part of the routine military exercises staged by the KPA to increase the nation's military capacity for self-defence.
    ...successful?

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,653
    I would have thougth Australia was (a lot)closer to N Korea than Finland. Obviously not...

    Finland's not on that map, the range extends about halfway across Russia, nearly to the Caspin Sea. I note that apart from Alaska,the US is safe. Main people who should be worried would be South Korea, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Japan, and Indonesia.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    11,250
    Finland was on the map, but just outside the largest circle.
    A chunk of northern Australia was inside the same circle.
    http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

  11. #101
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Clear Lake City, TX
    Posts
    8,939
    Quote Originally Posted by Rue
    Quote:
    The latest successful missile launches were part of the routine military exercises staged by the KPA to increase the nation's military capacity for self-defence.

    ...successful?
    Translation: It left the pad.
    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
    Isaac Asimov

    Moderation will be in purple.
    Rules for Posting to This Board

  12. #102
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    11,250
    It is not obvious to me that the missiles were intended to go any
    farther than they actually did. Were North Korean tracking ships
    located farther downrange? Or were all of their forces in the
    area where the missiles landed?

    -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
    http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

  13. #103
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Clear Lake City, TX
    Posts
    8,939
    Uh oh, now they've gone and done. They've gotten the Japanese upset.

    Japan said today it was considering whether a pre-emptive strike on the North's missile bases would violate its constitution ... several government officials openly discussed whether the country ought to take steps to better defend itself, including setting up the legal framework to allow Tokyo to launch a pre-emptive strike against Northern missile sites.
    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4035874.html
    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
    Isaac Asimov

    Moderation will be in purple.
    Rules for Posting to This Board

  14. #104
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,088
    Quote Originally Posted by Ara Pacis
    A NORAD source (via CNN) says that it has been watching NK intently over the last few weeks and was not surprised by the launches. They also said their systems were up and ready to respond incase anything approached the US. Draw your own conclusion.
    I like this one:
    ...The Red Chinese also got to see...how well state-of-the-art U.S. intelligence and communications systems operated in a crisis... HumanEventsOnline
    Also, doesn't maritime law require notification to any ships that may be in the trajectory/target area?

  15. #105
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,653
    Finland was on the map, but just outside the largest circle.
    A chunk of northern Australia was inside the same circle.


    No it's not. What you are thinking is Finland is actually the top of Russia. If you look below it, just on the edge of the range, you'll see the Caspian Sea and beyond the Black Sea, Finland is well over the horizon. Also none of Australia is in the ring, unless you are meaning the Blue ring, which is actually the globe, not the missile ranges, they are the yellow two circles.

  16. #106
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    11,250
    PhantomWolf,

    Either the map has changed since I looked at it before, or I was
    looking at a different map linked from this thread. The map you
    just described is color. The map I saw was black and white line
    drawing. The circle on the color map is smaller than the circle
    on the black and white map.

    -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
    http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

  17. #107
    Quote Originally Posted by V-GER
    Here's the picture with the missile ranges:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-paci...6464.stm#there


    I would have thougth Australia was (a lot)closer to N Korea than Finland. Obviously not...
    I assume this BBC map is the one Phantom Wolf is referring to. It is a colour map.

    Looking at this map, Finland is just on this map. Although the map does not show the full extent of the missile's range over the Arctic Circle.

    Right at the top of the map, and slightly left of centreof the map one can make out the Baltic Sea, and southern Finland - which is not in range, but it looks like Northern Finland, at least according to this map, would be in range.

    Because of this I have to disagree with both of you.

    Quote Originally Posted by PhantomWolf


    Finland was on the map, but just outside the largest circle.
    A chunk of northern Australia was inside the same circle.


    No it's not. What you are thinking is Finland is actually the top of Russia. If you look below it, just on the edge of the range, you'll see the Caspian Sea and beyond the Black Sea, Finland is well over the horizon. Also none of Australia is in the ring, unless you are meaning the Blue ring, which is actually the globe, not the missile ranges, they are the yellow two circles.
    Phantom Wolf, Finland is on the BBC Map, right towards the top of the map, just left of centre.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Root

    Finland was on the map, but just outside the largest circle.
    A chunk of northern Australia was inside the same circle.


    Jeff Root, I'm not sure which map you were looking at, but according to the BBC Map - which I believe is what Phantom Wolf is referring to, Australia was not inside the orange circle, although Northern Finland apparently is inside that same circle - Northern Australia was merely illuminated by a surrounding circle - as PhantomWolf points out.

    Though, of course, its a bit academic, because North Korea is hardly going to be shooting missiles over Russia anytime soon!

  18. #108
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    841
    Quote Originally Posted by jkmccrann
    Though, of course, its a bit academic, because North Korea is hardly going to be shooting missiles over Russia anytime soon!
    True of course, I was rather just wondering that Finland and Australia were about the same distance away from N Korea(or Korea in general). Living over here, you tend to think every country at that region to be closer to each other than they in reality are. Perhaps it's because In Europe distances are so much shorter, we think of other regions in the same way or something.

  19. #109
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,427

    Talking

    Uh oh, now they've gone and done. They've gotten the Japanese upset.
    Bring out the giant battle robots.
    Where did they stick Godzilla, anyways?

  20. #110
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,088
    Quote Originally Posted by ASEI
    ...Where did they stick Godzilla, anyways?
    Think I just saw him...in a Doritos commercial!

  21. #111
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,904
    Quote Originally Posted by V-GER
    True of course, I was rather just wondering that Finland and Australia were about the same distance away from N Korea(or Korea in general). Living over here, you tend to think every country at that region to be closer to each other than they in reality are. Perhaps it's because In Europe distances are so much shorter, we think of other regions in the same way or something.
    A friend of mine went to University of St. Andrew's. Rather than try to explain where Port Angeles is, she told everyone she's from "near Seattle." Someone finally asked her how near and was stunned by the answer. It's about a two-hour drive, longer if you don't take the ferry across the Puget Sound.

    Then again, I still thought North Korea was closer to Australia than that.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  22. #112
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    571
    Here is the KCNA (North Korea's news agency) article about the launches. It looks like the use of the T2 was not part of any attempted space launch.
    That is a seriously amazing read. You can almost feel yourself being brainwashed into believing the North Korean point of view. How must the locals who put up with this stuff from birth, feel

    I toggled a few days ahead and found an interesting attack on US flyovers of North Korea. I was curious about the report of U2s being involved.

    Am I mistaken or didn't this aircraft go off line in the late 70s?

  23. #113
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,693
    You are mistaken.

  24. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northern Utah
    Posts
    5,254
    The U-2 is still in service. Or at least it was as lat as 1999.
    I'm Not Evil.
    An evil person would do the things that pop into my head.

  25. #115
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    571
    Thanks for the link. Must have gotten muddled somewhere about the orginal series of U2s being replaced in the late sixties by the re-engineered version.

  26. #116
    Satellite Photos Detect Activity At North Korea Missile Bases

    North Korea could be preparing for new launches of mid-range missiles following last week's tests, with activity detected at its bases, a report said Tuesday citing Japanese government sources.
    http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Sate...Bases_999.html

  27. #117
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    location
    Posts
    10,477
    It looks like the THAAD ABM system had a successful test today. This might be useful against the Taepodong II.
    Et tu BAUT? Quantum mutatus ab illo.

  28. #118
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,653
    Phantom Wolf, Finland is on the BBC Map, right towards the top of the map, just left of centre.

    Looking again, yes, there is a slight demarkation of a border there, however....

    Northern Finland apparently is inside that same circle

    Debatable. Northern Finland is off the map, Southern is not in the target zone. Remember that Finland is on the western coast and Russia is on the eastern. You can just make out the border between them, and the yellow stays on the eastern side of that border. If anything, it's likely to clip the northeastern tip of Norway, but that would occur off the map.

  29. #119
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,693
    What's North Korea got against Finnland? Are those Lapplanders causing trouble again? Darn reindeer herders! Always making the world a more dangerous place for me and mine!

  30. #120
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,653
    Perhaps they plan to shoot down Santa Claus for not giving GWB a lump of coal last year.

Similar Threads

  1. What I Would Like to See From North Korea's Space Program
    By stutefish in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2012-Apr-20, 09:18 PM
  2. North Korea's Space program.
    By astromark in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 2012-Apr-14, 12:46 PM
  3. North Korea launches their rocket
    By humanrevolution in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2009-Apr-05, 07:01 AM
  4. North Korea missile test
    By Blob in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 2007-Jun-04, 08:43 PM
  5. North Korea Nuclear test
    By Blob in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 122
    Last Post: 2006-Oct-14, 07:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •