Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Practical Spacewarp Design

  1. #1

    Wink Practical Spacewarp Design

    Hello to All,

    Probably my releasd paper about the schematic design of a practical spacewarp can be considered as a nice matter. That's placed on:

    http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0511086

    The aim of this post is providing the possibility of introducing it to more numbers of people which I believe that's in favor of improving the science and a service to the mankind. However, your personal opinion on my work is important to me too.I guess you might be able and/or interested to help me at least via making a link of the above address within your page(s) or presenting it to more media. So, please give a clear answer to my request.

    Best Regards
    M. Mansouryar
    http://www.mansouryar.com/

    P.S.: A simplified description of my work is viewable on:

    http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=561

    http://www.americanantigravity.com/a...nian-Einstein?

    http://extremetechnology.blogspot.co...spacewarp.html

    http://www.stardrivedevice.com/links.html

  2. #2
    Calculations for testing your theory will prove too difficult as the models you use are not sufficiently callibrated.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,539
    To create a negative energy is like to fall down into a Black Hole and go out of it. You need a superluminal velocity or you need to pull all the Universe into this Black Hole if want to go out.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    763
    This is more or less well known wrong principle.
    it assumes that space is wrapped, or you wrap it yourself, even if it is possible it is wrapped in usesless way, and also if you want to wrap it yourself you need too much energy, and more likely will just blow up all galaxy by doing such experiments or create new big bang (if you find some way to make that much of energy).

  5. #5

    Red face The story ain't over

    Hi everybody,

    I’m back and have a suggestion. Maybe it's not cool to address the members of one forum to another, but I assume you're enough open-minded and invite you to visit this 3-pages discussion:

    http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/...topic=230&st=0

    By the way, any chance of launching a similar one in here?

    Cheers,
    Mammad

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,835
    Buried deep that thread you mentioned I found a link to this article;
    http://www.betterhumans.com/blogs/ge...4/01/5525.aspx
    Very amusing;
    especially the comments at the bottom from Dagon.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    Warp drive when indeed.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,005
    Hi Mammad! Most of us here are allergic to revolutionary new physics, but willing to hear you out. I think the physics part needs to be well grounded before the inventive part can gain any traction. Demonstration of a working model would, however, be compelling evidence. I will embrace any device that works and worry about the physics later.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
    Buried deep that thread you mentioned I found a link to this article;
    http://www.betterhumans.com/blogs/ge...4/01/5525.aspx
    Very amusing;
    especially the comments at the bottom from Dagon.
    Ayup, that was pretty darn funny...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    18,998
    Note: I moved a post from this thread to the Small Media section as it was simply inviting discussion of the Stargate from the TV series and Movie.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Mansouryar's paper
    However as shown in Box 7, one can visualize it as a "virtual pregnant worm" (VPW). There are reasons in which make one not to have a strange feeling to that terminology. First, the base geometry is of a TW, then a WD is added by a surgery. As shown by Van Den Broeck [86], one can make a roomy bubble by some changes in the parameters.
    Mansouryar, I'm afraid you lost me there!

  12. #12
    antoniseb,

    I wish you'd let it to be right here. I liked to know people's opinions on it.

    Pete,

    What do you mean?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    13,441
    18 April, 2006 + 30 days < 27 March, 2007.

Similar Threads

  1. Undesigned, designed, unintelligent design & intelligent design
    By wd40 in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 279
    Last Post: 2011-May-31, 02:45 AM
  2. Practical jokes
    By SKY in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 2007-Sep-04, 05:54 PM
  3. Which Interstellar Travel Is Most Practical?
    By SAMU in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 2006-Sep-10, 11:23 AM
  4. U.S.-Canadian Practical Joke
    By Candy in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2005-Mar-02, 07:32 PM
  5. Largest Practical Telescope
    By mike alexander in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2003-Sep-18, 08:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •