For example, This is how I can see that the Reginald Cahill papers, showing that there is a Gravity Background Field is correct, but only on that part!!!
He also says that he found that by finding what publius has dubbed "Borehole Gravity", which is the Fine Structure Constant.
I am not convinced though, that this is actually the Planck Mass Inert DM, but the way he uses it, defintely mimics the exact same thing when he applies it to 'all of space', and so he is showing that it takes the place of the DM in determining the rotation curces in the spiral galaxies.
But, because he doesn't understand numerous things, he has got much of the rest wrong, and because he doesn't know where this 'space' is coming from, how it is made, and "ESPECIALLY" how fast it is traveling, he *Thinks* he is showing that Einstein was wrong, and that there is a preferred frame, and that the MM experiment showed it, etc.
So, what does my little model show about this?
That because the MBH's are making 'space', there is a BGF, but what he doesn't know is that it is traveling at "C", and therfore preserves Einsteins SR perfectly!
Also, it is easy to see that we can also see that QSSC was on the right track with Matter getting here a little at a time, but doesn't necessarily make anything else right about their theory.