Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Today's Ray of Hope

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,974

  2. #2
    Thanks for the link.

    I am still a bit wearry about this, they could be doing this just to keep from a war between Religion and Science, expecially after all of that ID stuff. Just have to wait and see...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,909
    What makes me kind of sad is that the two congregations they describe equal 106 people, which is about a third the size of the fundamentalist church some of my friends from grade school attended. I really think the many, many churches, synagogues, et al that have no problem with evolution and recognize that it doesn't have to conflict with faith need to get more vocal. The individual congregations seen one-on-one may not match in numbers, but the congregations will outbalance in the other direction.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    I think they were pointing out that even small, out of the way, churches are endorsing Evolution - not just the big industrial churches - further showing the IDers as fringists and loonies.

    DS - I don't worry too much about organized religion vs science. There's no war there (certainly not the way there was even 200 years ago). As science makes discoveries, religion must adapt to it. (ok, science does too, but that's internal,not forced on it from outside, if you follow my drift)

    And, I don't think the organized religions would hold off from a 'war' with science if they thought they had a snowball's chance in Bahgdad of winning. but maybe I'm just being cynical.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,379
    Quote Originally Posted by LurchGS
    And, I don't think the organized religions would hold off from a 'war' with science if they thought they had a snowball's chance in Bahgdad of winning. but maybe I'm just being cynical.
    It gets awfully cold in the desert at night, when you think no one is paying attention to what you're doing. Kinda like these stealth maneuvers IDers keep trying to pull.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    that would imply that the IDers have the backing of the major religions - and (at least, as far as I know) they don't.

    Or am I misunderstanding you? (wouldn't be the first time I misunderstood somebody else. I could have sworn my wifeoid said 'yes', lo these many years ago)

    But, I do think that if organized religion - the big houses - thought they could win a war or battle with science, they'd take it on. (I suppose the IDers could be some 'department of dirty tricks' for the Pope or whoever leads the Baptists or something ... but I doubt it. They're more sophisticated than this)

    (oh, lest anybody get irate, the selections of religious entities in the preceeding paragraph are for display purposes only. They are not intended as attacks in specific, nor are they intended for individual resale)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,379
    Well, I read this situation thus. IDers as agents independent of organized religions are the ultimately deniable soldiers. They're perfectly willing to sacrifice themselves for the cause without any of the mainstream leadership getting bogged down when they get caught. Yet should they succeed, they'll be chanted up in the churches as "good Christians spreading the gospel" with the institutional amnesia erasing any of the denials and condemnation that might have previously been spouted when they got caught.

    Religious leadership is like political leadership. Its a bad idea till it works, then it was your idea the whole time. And yes, that's raw, unrepentant, unabashed cynicism you're reading.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Doodler
    Well, I read this situation thus. IDers as agents independent of organized religions are the ultimately deniable soldiers. They're perfectly willing to sacrifice themselves for the cause without any of the mainstream leadership getting bogged down when they get caught. Yet should they succeed, they'll be chanted up in the churches as "good Christians spreading the gospel" with the institutional amnesia erasing any of the denials and condemnation that might have previously been spouted when they got caught.

    Religious leadership is like political leadership. Its a bad idea till it works, then it was your idea the whole time. And yes, that's raw, unrepentant, unabashed cynicism you're reading.
    Ok, we don't really disagree - at least, it doesn't sound as though you think the Pope (or whomever) is really behind it.
    Yeah, if it were to succeed, then they'd certainly jump on the band wgon and proclaim it a good thing.

    God, it feels so good to be a cynic!

    said by a froth-at-the-mouth two-basin kitchen cynic!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,909
    Quote Originally Posted by LurchGS
    Yeah, if it were to succeed, then they'd certainly jump on the band wgon and proclaim it a good thing.
    I dunno. The Catholics certainly got their fingers burned on opposing science in the past. I think the current generation at the Vatican (and, yes, it took 'em long enough to come 'round) are big into "science is over there and we're over here and let's keep it that way." Could be true of other religions, too, but I'm not as well versed in 'em.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren
    The Catholics certainly got their fingers burned on opposing science in the past.
    That's one way of saying it
    1769: The city of Brescia, Italy is devastated when the Church of San Nazaro, near Venice, is struck by lightning. The resulting fire ignites 200,000 lb (90,000 kg) of gunpowder being stored there, causing a massive explosion which destroys one sixth of the city and kills 3,000 people. The disaster prompts the Roman Catholic Church to abandon their religious objection to using lightning rods to protect their property.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,974
    Quote Originally Posted by LurchGS
    But, I do think that if organized religion - the big houses - thought they could win a war or battle with science, they'd take it on. (I suppose the IDers could be some 'department of dirty tricks' for the Pope or whoever leads the Baptists or something ... but I doubt it. They're more sophisticated than this)
    Always wondered about that; who does lead the baptists? (and the Lutherans and Unitarians and Presbyterians and . . . )

    Maybe they all just report directly to God. I like a nice flat org structure.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,379
    Quote Originally Posted by farmerjumperdon
    Always wondered about that; who does lead the baptists? (and the Lutherans and Unitarians and Presbyterians and . . . )

    Maybe they all just report directly to God. I like a nice flat org structure.
    I believe they have some overagency to which they report, I don't know exactly. In the end, the overbody is primarily advisory, imposing rules through stigma and peer pressure than any actual mandate. Its not like the Catholic structure at all. The Episcopal church is the only non-Catholic branch I'm aware of with a built in superstructure going back to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Even then, some progressive churches under the Episcopal flag throw the middle digit to the Church of England and march to their own tune.

  13. #13
    if it isn't about love, I don't know whot is or all blue boys look like a Knepper.

Similar Threads

  1. Hope yet.
    By astromark in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2012-Jan-04, 01:22 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Oct-26, 02:40 PM
  3. Hope Everything will be OK ...
    By Whirlpool in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 2008-Sep-20, 08:56 PM
  4. There's Hope!
    By SciFi Chick in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2004-Dec-18, 03:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •