Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: more odd pictures

  1. #1
    Why are there pictures where the cross hairs are missing and there isn't anything white or bright behind them?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    4,115
    On 2003-02-20 02:34, joemillionare wrote:
    Why are there pictures where the cross hairs are missing and there isn't anything white or bright behind them?
    Well, maybe the background is completely black?
    Sorry, but without pointers to the images in question or photo id's your question can't be answered.

    Harald

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,353
    Take a look here for the photo IDs you want.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Clear Lake City, TX
    Posts
    8,872
    We have discussed this topic repeatedly on the BABB. But, there is a "short course" available.

    Go to http://www.clavius.org/photoret.html and scroll a bit over halfway down the page. There are illustrative photos and an explanation of what happens to make the crosshairs fade out in some shots.

    _________________
    <font color=000099>Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.</font>
    Isaac Asimov

    (Just want to mention... this got posted only once!)

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Jim on 2003-02-20 08:24 ]</font>

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    12,345
    Dagnabbit, Jim, I was getting ready to post the Clavius page when I saw you beat me to it. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,417
    Please refer to a specific photo or photos.


  7. #7
    Good morning apolloxxxx and how are you today?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,417
    As far as I know, he never used that nick here. That's one of his nicks from ApolloHoax. BABB readers know him as SaturnV. And the Yahoo group knows him as "nasahoax" and "desertfox21". A troll by any other name ...


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,353
    A troll by any other name ...
    ...would smell as sour.

  10. #10
    On 2003-02-20 10:35, Glom wrote:
    A troll by any other name ...
    ...would smell as sour.
    Too bad they don't turn to stone in daylight.....

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    216
    On 2003-02-20 10:39, Mainframes wrote:
    On 2003-02-20 10:35, Glom wrote:
    A troll by any other name ...
    ...would smell as sour.
    Too bad they don't turn to stone in daylight.....
    I thought those were lawn gnomes.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,874
    SO Apollo...Umm..joe..Yah whatever. Welcome to the board if you are for real.


    Show us the exact picture that you are talking about. Each pic. has a exact reference number that allows pople to easily find and reference them. Whtch one was it? Or can you describe it? I bet somebody has seen it before. Good Luck.


    P.S. I think a Gargoyle is more descriptive. Only comes out at night and early morning before and after high school.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    312
    Erm, how did Jagster deduce that he was SaturnV/Apollo_172003/Nasahoax/whatever? Did I miss something?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,874
    They talk the same and both use a liberal amount of capitalization of whole words. He has come back recently with the exact same questions as the other did in the same wording.

    SmartHoaxer might not be, but the evidence is very strong against him.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,832
    Could AS16-113-18282 be one?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    183
    On 2003-02-20 13:26, Eirik wrote:
    On 2003-02-20 10:39, Mainframes wrote:
    On 2003-02-20 10:35, Glom wrote:
    A troll by any other name ...
    ...would smell as sour.
    Too bad they don't turn to stone in daylight.....
    I thought those were lawn gnomes.
    No, no. Mainframes has been reading The Hobbit. Or is that legend older than Tolkien? Now there's an off-topic tangent that could bring about a swift thread-locking! [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]

    (edit to quote poster's correct name)
    _________________
    Nowhere in all space or on a thousand worlds will there be men to share our loneliness... - Loren Eisely, "The Immense Journey", 1956.

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Jovianboy on 2003-02-21 05:41 ]</font>

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    4,115
    On 2003-02-20 19:44, Peter B wrote:
    Could AS16-113-18282 be one?
    HBs usually use low-quality scans to make their points, e.g.
    http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...-113-18282.jpg
    or worse
    http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/images/pao/AS16/10075829.jpg

    But a real good scan http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...-113-18282.jpg leaves no open question.

    Never try to prove scams with bad scans.

    Harald

    (Typo corrected)

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kucharek on 2003-02-21 06:10 ]</font>

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,353
    Never try to prove scams with bad scans.

    F****** A, Bubba! [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_cool.gif[/img]

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    6,275
    On 2003-02-21 05:35, Jovianboy wrote:
    ...Mainframes has been reading The Hobbit. Or is that legend older than Tolkien? Now there's an off-topic tangent that could bring about a swift thread-locking! [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
    Tolkien knew about and borrowed from many sources, including Norse and Icelandic folk tales, sagas and myths. Apparently the notion of trolls that turn to stone in sunlight is an Icelandic legend. Tolkien may have been present when a colleague, Helen Buckhurst, read a paper at Oxford describing such creatures (Feb. 1926).

    And it's not off-topic. After all, it's bright solar radiation that does in the trolls -- do you suppose the entire Lunar surface could be troll carcases?


  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    2,683
    I think it's appropriate to point out that Joemillionaire's (any relation to JoetheBartender?) question was about crosshairs that do not appear over white areas. IOW, he's asking about instances that do not fit the standard explanation.

    Now, as to what those instances are, I think we'd need specific examples before we could give positive answers. But here are some possibities.

    1. Black crosshairs on black backgrounds. Not enough contrast to make them out.

    2. Low quality scans where such details fail to show on the image. High quality prints and scans will still show them.

    3. Deliberate airbrushing for publication in magazines, books, or for other aesthetic purposes. The originals will still have them though.

    But where is JM now? He hasn't bothered to reply to this thread yet.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    6,275
    Hums...
    "He's gone where the goblins go, below, below, below..."

Similar Threads

  1. I want pictures
    By NEOWatcher in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2007-Apr-19, 01:31 AM
  2. Several new pictures
    By slotdrag in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 2005-May-23, 08:21 AM
  3. My first pictures through the PST
    By Gneiss in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2005-Mar-14, 04:29 PM
  4. We Want Pictures!!!
    By Andromeda321 in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2005-Jan-15, 12:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •