Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 518

Thread: Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) - "Curiosity"

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
    Planetary Society Weblog: News Flash: ChemCam and MARDI have been saved!

    Late today, I got the announcement that two of these instruments have received a reprieve, MARDI and ChemCam. The best news is about ChemCam, without which the rover would have had almost no ability to figure out, from a distance, which rocks were most worth investigating up close.
    [...]
    I have mixed feelings about this. It is fabulous, fabulous, an enormous relief, that MSL will not be blind to the chemical composition of rocks spotted from a distance. It will save a lot of wasted driving to spots that turn out to be similar to rocks investigated before; and will also allow the rover to spot unusual things it might otherwise have missed. [...] At the same time, I feel like I'm supposed to be feeling super-grateful despite the fact that science capability has still, in the end, been descoped; there's still three more instruments that were affected.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,032
    Great news, I'm glad they found a solution to their budget woes. The last few MSL landing sites look very interesting

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,734
    Reconaissance of MSL Sites

    The number of sites is down to six. (See also the Universe Today follow-up.)
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,237
    Interesting. We should do a poll on the 6 sites.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,734
    Mars Science Lab Could Cost $2 Billion

    The total cost of NASA's Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission could reach $2 billion as the program races to surmount its developmental problems and make its scheduled 2009 launch, according to Associate Administrator for Science Alan Stern.

    A surface rover the size of a small car, the flagship-level MSL mission originally was approved at a cost of $1.5 billion, Stern told a Feb. 20 meeting of the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) in Monrovia, Calif. The latest estimate for the program is $1.8 billion, but it continues to rise, Stern said.

    MSL's problems began to surface last year, when NASA had to shift $62 million to the program and cost-cap its various instruments to keep it on track. Just a few months later, the program revealed it would not be able to make its September 2009 launch date without another infusion of cash, as it dealt with a costly change in its thermal protection scheme (DAILY, Feb. 14).

    Following an evaluation by an independent cost team, NASA is bracing itself to shift an estimated $165 million to keep MSL going. That money will be taken from current appropriations, and will come from within the Science Mission Directorate's Planetary division, Stern said.

    "From what we've been told by the independent cost review team, this is not the end," Stern said. "It's going to go up some more. We just don't know how much."
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,315
    One advantage of MSL over Spirit and Oppy- it's easier to draw. The MERs have basically an enlarged Sojourner body, but then that solar panel is sort of a funny shape and hard to draw.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    116
    This is beginning to look like a front runner for site selection.

    MSL to land in Mawrth Vallis?

    Andrew Brown.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,793
    Yes, I think that because of the clays and Noachian rocks Mawrth Vallis and Nilli Fossae are highly rated by both the MSL and ExoMars teams (and there are people common to both). I suspect that one of these will get the pick for one of the rovers, unless it is ruled out by the engineers.

    Jon

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    116
    Thanks Jon.

    Mawrth Vallis does look like a really ideal site. Let hope the engineers do not find anything of undue concern within the proposed landing ellipse.

    From the start, when the MRO began returning HiRISE images of this area, I did think this was the site. The potential selection seems to back up my own preference for this site.

    The exposed clays as you say appear to date right back to the Noachian, not long after the crust of Mars colled sufficiently to allow for liquid water, Mars had a dense atmosphere & that Mars still had a global magnetosphere.

    If this site is chosen & MSL lands safely, we will learn so much from this mission.

    I am just concerned the landing procedure looks too complicated, winching down the MSL from a thrusting skycrane???

    Just hope the concept is tested thoroughly.

    Andrew Brown.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,734
    From Universe Today, but worth noting in this thread:

    Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011

    NASA's over budget Mars Science Laboratory mission, scheduled for a 2009 launch, may be delayed due to problems with the atmospheric re-entry shield design. A new shield will cost up to $30 million, adding to the $1.8 billion price tag, $165 million more than planned. The mission uses innovative landing technologies and is powered by a mini-nuclear reactor, giving it the ability to travel faster and carry a bigger payload over the Martian terrain. This new setback may postpone the launch until 2011.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  11. #71
    I like this generational family picture:



    They're growing kids big these days.

    NASA MSL: Third-Generation Mars Rover Dwarfs Predecessors

    Mars rovers appear to be shrinking with age! The biggest, baddest, newest rover being built is the Mars Science Laboratory rover (right). It's the size of a small sport-utility vehicle. Still exploring Mars four years after landing are the dune-buggy-sized rovers Spirit and Opportunity (left). The first-generation rover, Sojourner, is the size of a microwave oven.

    Why are the rovers getting bigger? The answer is one word: science. The mass and volume of science instruments -- tools the rovers use to study the Martian surface and environment -- have remained fairly constant at about 10 percent. To determine if Mars ever could have supported life, the Mars Science Laboratory rover will travel farther, carry more instruments, and sample more rocks and soils than ever before. Like a car with more gizmos, the newest robotic beast has to evolve to carry all the gear!

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,213
    Cool Pic! all in one. Thx 01101001.
    Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr

    Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit

    Hint: this is at heart a scientific forum, and underneath the fooling around there are some diamond-hard minds hanging about, ready to tear you to shreads. -- Mike Alexander

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    35,571
    Quote Originally Posted by BetaDust View Post
    Cool Pic! all in one. Thx 01101001.
    Ditto, very nice.
    Isn't it every parents dream that their kids will do even more in life then them. Spirit and Opportunity must be so proud.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  14. #74
    Emily Lakdawalla has been attending, and reporting on, the current (3rd round) MSL landing site meetings.
    Planetary Society Weblog: MSL landing site meeting: Where on Mars to look for ancient life:

    [Roger Buick] said, "Go somewhere with diverse sedimentary rocks, diverse lithology, deposited over a range of times, with long-lived water bodies, rapid lithification, fine grain size (phyllosillicates are wonderful things). Little evidence of oxidation or acidic alteration. Somewhere with little susbsequent disturbance -- Mars is a good place for that. Somewhere only recently exposed -- a little crater. Somewhere where the basic geology is pretty well understood.

    "Perhaps you will get lucky on Mars. Good luck, all of you."
    Also, earlier: Planetary Society Weblog: MSL landing site meeting, September 15-17, 2008

    Last year, I had discussions with scientists who told me that all this debate was worthless because in the end they'd go for the safest spot, which would be Meridiani. It'll be interesting to see whether they were right.
    Last edited by 01101001; 2008-Sep-16 at 06:42 PM.

  15. #75
    And, another one: Planetary Society Weblog: MSL landing site meeting: Getting beaten up is good for science

    These landing site selection meetings are fascinating because I don't know of any other venue in which so many scientists get together and participate in open discussion (and, yes, even pointed argument). Ordinarily, in planetary science, there are talks, followed by a brief question-and-response; even for the most controversial talks, there are usually only a few minutes for discussion, and no back-and-forth, only comment and response, and then it's on to the next talk.

    This meeting (and the others like it in the past for MSL and the rovers) is structured differently. [...]

  16. #76
    Personally, I'm hoping Gale Crater gets it - it's an utterly STUNNING site with a massive ammount of easily accesable exposed bedrock all the way up a canyon thru the central crater peak.

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,793
    Gale's my favourite too. Not only is it scientifically attractive and ranks high in the engineering criteria, I like it because it is named after an Australian amateur astronomer, the only Australian on mars (although there are some Australian place ames like Warrego Vallis and Nhill, Cooma, and Canberra craters).

    I will be very annoyed if we go to Meridiani again.

    Jon

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,452

  19. #79
    Fair credit to Ryan - he's being doing a great job with documenting events at the meeting with a good write up of each site. It'll be interesting to see hwo the voting goes.

  20. #80
    Emily Lakdawalla Planetary Society Weblog: Ustream chat today 12:00 PDT / 19:00 UTC

    From PowerPoint presentation available for you to download, she appears to aim to talk about MSL and landing sites.

    Starts in about 100 minutes.

    Edit: Meant to say: she almost always archives these 1-hour web chats, so if you miss the live event, and have an interest in MSL, the recorded version might be worth hunting for (on her Ustream page).

  21. #81
    http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landing...atkins_opt.pdf

    SUPERB presentation - pictures of flight hardware. I know it's big - but I keep forgetting just how big.

  22. #82
    Planetary Society Weblog: MSL landing site meeting: Votes are in!:

    Ryan Anderson reports that there appear to be three clear favorites: the three closed basins, Gale crater, Eberswalde delta, and Holden crater. The two spectacular-mineralogy-but-not-closed-basin sites (Nili Fossae and Mawrth Vallis) were middle-ranked. And the two Meridiani sites (Miyamoto and South Meridiani) were lowest-ranked. These are but recommendations; they get passed on to the project science group for further consideration.

  23. #83
    For my part, I'm really rooting for Eberswalde Delta...

  24. #84
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,734
    Mars Science Lab in doubt

    Top NASA managers will decide next week the fate of the Mars Science Laboratory, a nuclear-powered astrobiology rover that already has cost $1.5 billion and is likely to hit the 30-percent overrun ceiling that could trigger cancellation by Congress.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  25. #85
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,521
    Right.. at the culmination of the 'follow the water' strategy consider something silly like that.. Offset any cost overrun to the years and years of essentially free continued use of the MERs. "But it's... money.. and ... elections.. 'n stuff...". *sighs*
    ____________
    "Dumb all over, a little ugly on the side." -- Frank Zappa
    "Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
    "This is really very simple, but unfortunately it's very complicated." -- publius

    Moderator comments in this color | Get moderator attention using the lower left icon:
    Recommended reading: Board Rules * Forum FAQs * Conspiracy Theory Advice * Alternate Theory Advocates Advice

  26. #86
    Bail out MSL!

    Who am I kidding? The money's all gone.

  27. #87
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,793
    What would 700 billion invested in space exploration bought?

    Grrr!

  28. #88
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,315
    What would 700 billion invested in space exploration bought?
    Such stuff as dreams are made on.

  29. #89
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,734
    Quote Originally Posted by JonClarke View Post
    What would 700 billion invested in space exploration bought?

    Grrr!
    It's been pointed out that it would pay for seven Project Apollos.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  30. #90
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    In the neighborhood of Grover's Mill
    Posts
    2,276
    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek View Post
    It's been pointed out that it would pay for seven Project Apollos.
    ToSeeked, in a manner of speaking.
    I may have many faults, but being wrong ain't one of them. - Jimmy Hoffa

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 2011-Nov-04, 07:24 PM
  2. Does science specifically define "information" and "machine"?
    By AndrewJ in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2009-May-13, 12:20 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2008-Dec-20, 12:38 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-Nov-22, 10:00 PM
  5. "Mars Live 2004" on Science Channel
    By Wally in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2004-Jan-27, 01:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •