Page 15 of 18 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 450 of 518

Thread: Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) - "Curiosity"

  1. #421
    Quote Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
    I have every confidence in JPL, and it's abilities to carry out this mission.

    I'm more "concerned" about variables we can do nothing about....such as landing on a boulder.


    edit to add...."concerned" is too strong a word...let's just say I am nervous.
    Those guys do indeed have confidence. I'm really happy about Adam Steltzner, I really like this guy and I'm very inspired that he's on the team ... I have never felt so inspired since... well, since Peter Smith was so emotional during the landing of Phoenix.

    Tonight Steltzner said: Last night I slept very well When I heard that, I said : wow, this guy really sleeps better than me, and he's from the team and I'm not. I should have more confidence in the JPL team

  2. #422
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Space Chimp View Post
    The conspiracy theories would spew mad theories even more if there were no pictures.

    There sure are some cynical comments over at the BBC...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18933037
    I'd note that those asinine comments got heavily voted down.

    This was the most popular comment:

    So we're landing a rover the same size as a car on another planet 250m km away, using a completely automated system due to the radio time delay all for 1/6th the cost of a sporting event... why is this not bigger news!?
    This will be a brilliant achievement if everything goes to plan, the Mars rovers have been some of the most interesting projects in history; Opportunity has been going for 8 years!

  3. #423
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
    I'd note that those asinine comments got heavily voted down.

    This was the most popular comment:
    My favourite comment is this one:

    A plutonium powered generator is still junk. If their was life on Mars would a plutonium leak not kill them?

    This is not an ordinary stupidity. This is a genuine stupidity.

  4. #424
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    12,345
    Quote Originally Posted by Space Chimp View Post
    There sure are some cynical comments over at the BBC...
    There are some seriously disturbed/angry people posting there, who simply are not familiar with rationality....not even a passing aquaintance with it.

  5. #425
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    405
    you guys watching any the buildups?
    Im watching planetfest for now -will be switching to seti institute hangout from NASA Ames@ 00.00 UTC (got a question lined up for Seth), then maybe a bit of frasers offering - but might just go with nasa TV for the actual landing

  6. #426
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,258
    Quote Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
    There are some seriously disturbed/angry people posting there, who simply are not familiar with rationality....not even a passing aquaintance with it.
    That's why, as a rule, one should never read online comments on a news story.

  7. #427
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The Wild West
    Posts
    7,144
    That looks like a tricky course. I hope they don't hit it over the green.
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

  8. #428
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    13,995
    Quote Originally Posted by mutleyeng View Post
    you guys watching any the buildups?
    Im watching planetfest for now -will be switching to seti institute hangout from NASA Ames@ 00.00 UTC (got a question lined up for Seth), then maybe a bit of frasers offering - but might just go with nasa TV for the actual landing
    I'm just going to go with the NASA TV coverage of the landing. Playing Skyrim/Dawnguard until then.

  9. #429
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    159
    I understood that this will be the final rover, not more are planned, but I just heard a NASA spokesman say when asked what happens if if fails, that we'd just "pick our selves up and go again"

    What is the best justification for Curiosity, considering it has a cost of almost a billion?

    EDIT: scratch that almost a billion, it seems to be nearer 2.5 billion.

  10. #430
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    405
    almost a billion is good value (ssshhh everyone)

    With a bit of luck ESA/Roscosmos will follow it up with the exomars missions

    (nasa tv best for landing i think yes Moose - no need for others jabbering)

  11. #431
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Depew, NY
    Posts
    4,822
    No one is checking the Hangouts on G+?
    Solfe

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    'That was tops! Who's not good at math? I was all, "Four!"' - Finn, Adventure Time.

  12. #432
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,541
    I'l be working when it lands. or rather just be finished with delivering my goods and heading home for the night. The joys of being a delivery man at night Now I'ma gonna be thinking more about this here rover than where I'm delivering my parcels...
    Here's for hoping the JPL team the best of luck with their parcel delivery

  13. #433
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    18,933
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTree1941 View Post
    EDIT: scratch that almost a billion, it seems to be nearer 2.5 billion.
    Even at that price, it's 2 Shuttle LEO launches or or 1/60th of the ISS. Bargain.
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  14. 2012-Aug-06, 01:04 AM

  15. #434
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,144
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTree1941 View Post
    I understood that this will be the final rover, not more are planned, but I just heard a NASA spokesman say when asked what happens if if fails, that we'd just "pick our selves up and go again"

    What is the best justification for Curiosity, considering it has a cost of almost a billion?

    EDIT: scratch that almost a billion, it seems to be nearer 2.5 billion.
    Lots worse things to spend 2.5 billion on. Heck, the Pentagon loses that much money in rounding errors.
    Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting.

  16. #435
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTree1941 View Post
    What is the best justification for Curiosity, considering it has a cost...2.5 billion.
    The Viking project cost about $1 billion 1975 dollars, roughly $4 billion today. The Viking landers were fixed position, not rovers. Neither Viking lander or orbiter could assess the landing site for major obstacles. The landers relied on pure luck to avoid hitting an obstacle.

    Except for the Skycrane aspect, the entry descent and landing of Viking was not too different from Curiosity. Both had jettisonable aeroshell, supersonic parachute, powered descent, and many pyrotechnic devices which simply had to work.

    Viking had a Honeywell HDC-402 computer at about 230,000 instructions per second, using 18 KB of plated-wire memory. Curiosity has a RAD750 CPU running at 400 million instructions per second and 2GB of flash memory.

    Since Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) mostly didn't exist in the early 1970s when Viking was designed, any aerodynamic aspect such as parachute behavior could not be modeled. They had to rely on actual testing, extrapolation and informed guessing.

    Aspects of Curiosity EDL are risky but so was Viking, and for that matter, Apollo. On Apollo many different pyros had to work perfectly and there was no backup. E.g, parachute pyros and the explosive guillotine which separated the LM ascent and descent stage. There was no "try again" if they failed -- they simply had to work, and at exactly the right time.

  17. #436
    Hey, Doug is on NASA TV showing the Eyes of the Solar System!

  18. #437
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,701
    I've started a new thread specifically for the EDL: http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthre...utes-of-Terror
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  19. #438
    Congratulations to everyone involved in this project. I never cease to be amazed by the JPL and company.

  20. #439
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,144
    They made it! Hoorah!
    Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting.

  21. #440
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,369
    Somewhere in eternity, Rube Goldberg is smiling...

  22. #441
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,030
    Just adding my congratulations to everyone who made it happen!

  23. #442
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    18,933
    Where's that clapping smilie when you really nead it!
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  24. #443
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The Wild West
    Posts
    7,144
    Unbelievable. I cannot imagine the elation that those working on this project must feel. Seven minutes of terror suddenly turned to unmitigated joy. Wow.
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

  25. #444
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,283
    YES!

  26. #445
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    218
    Quote Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
    There are some seriously disturbed/angry people posting there, who simply are not familiar with rationality....not even a passing aquaintance with it.
    Yes. These commenters have no soul or vision, or are just plain dead inside. Especially on a glorious morning like this.


    so a machine can go where no man could ever go?
    to visit places no man could,
    a waste of resources?
    a waste of time for those involved.
    there are more wholesome things to do in this time of plenty.
    yet those in power insist on research of no moral value,
    that serves technology, which in turn negates life.
    I dont get this at all, why go to another planet when this planet needs help the most, we have people dying of cancer ect ect, people are starving world wide not to mention diplomatic problems the world over and yet they spend billions on this project to do what to find out if water or life was on another planet millions of miles away from here who comes first humans or space
    Whining losers and cranks aside, congratulations to NASA and all involved.

  27. #446
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,072
    Congratulations to NASA and all who worked to get the rover on Mars intact. Well done!

  28. #447
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,629
    Great news! I can't wait to see more as Curiosity gets moving. Looking forward to seeing sand dunes

  29. #448
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Great NorthWet
    Posts
    5,121
    Quote Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
    Somewhere in eternity, Rube Goldberg is smiling...
    You read my mind! Sometimes Rube gets it right!
    Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.

  30. #449
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    In the neighborhood of Grover's Mill
    Posts
    2,252
    Congratulations to the team!
    I watched it live on NASA TV, and they made it look easy.

  31. #450
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    12,345
    Quote Originally Posted by Space Chimp View Post
    Especially on a glorious morning like this.
    Yes....it is glorious...

    Update/news conference from JPL at 9 AM pacific time...about an hour and a half from "now".

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 2011-Nov-04, 07:24 PM
  2. Does science specifically define "information" and "machine"?
    By AndrewJ in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2009-May-13, 12:20 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2008-Dec-20, 12:38 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-Nov-22, 10:00 PM
  5. "Mars Live 2004" on Science Channel
    By Wally in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2004-Jan-27, 01:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •