Hacked satellites - do you see the results ?

[Dragon Star]

Look guys, cansouth is just trying to pull chains here, and your LETTING HIM! Stop posting here and he looses, game over. It's not like you all are going to teach him anything because it's a joke, period. So just leave it alone.

He is already on thin ice, and he just hot-linked an image that I KNOW does not belong to him, so his stay is limited.

[Nicolas]

You're braking rules on burden of proof, using evidence that has been debunked, hotlinking images from sites other than upload sites, and talking politics.

I draw a line here for myself where I definately stop, to let those people being given that task solve this issue. Others may feel free to use my line.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

[cansouth]

Another thing about "too complicated": in order to read the mind with a satellite, the mind needs to transmit a signal to the satellite. Can the mind do this? NO.

I think the hacker intensify the vibrations from the brain somehow. Maybe by sending more electricity inside people who he wants to read the mind of. It is a matter of vibrations. Because of vibrations a dog can observe when a person is afraid. The satellite hacker reads vibrations from the brains.

but the currect resolution is such that a whole brain would be 1 data unit (pixel if you're talking graphics) at the very best. Try reading the mind from that, it's worse than reading a thick book without being able to open it.

It should be possible to identify the vibrations.

[Musashi]

Thank you for the answer cansouth. With that, I bid this thread adieu.

[Hamlet]

I am not proved wrong. You put yourself in to complicated theoretical high technology discussion, and make the wrong conclusions.

No. Using physics and readily available information about how satellites work, we concluded that your claims have no basis.

For review:

1. You've not established that anyone or anything can read minds or alter behavior from a satellite.
2. You've not shown that any of the effects you claim are abnormal.
3. You given no basis for comparing the pre-hacking frequency to the post-hacking frequency of the claimed effects.
4. You've chosen to ignore the very basic objections we've provided and don't seem willing to learn the basics of how satellites work.

How can you expect anyone to take this seriously?

[Wolverine]

cansouth, you were warned here not to hotlink images, particularly the copyrighted variety. You were subsequently warned by an administrator not to post politically, here. Those are serious transgressions -- it was most unwise of you to ignore these warnings.

It's not only clear that you have no intention of abiding by our forum guidelines, but also that you're determined to ignore the legitimate questions posed by other forum members which address the fundamental illogic in your posts.

We will not tolerate such flagrant disregard for our guidelines. As such, your account has been terminated.

Locked.