Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 181 to 210 of 233

Thread: Do scientists see ghosts?

  1. #181
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    12,345
    Quote Originally Posted by Moonrock
    Yes, one was a chemist with first class honours- satisfied?
    Not really...it's still an anecdote, a story without any evidence. As such it proves nothing.

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,732
    I've got an anecdote, too. It comes from the History Channel special about Houdini that I watched the other night.

    It seems that Houdini was perfectly aware that huge numbers of the spiritualists of his day were frauds, given that they used tricks he himself used for some of his illusions and escapes. (Funny, that. Actually, there's a very good description of fradulent spiritualists in Strong Poison, by Dorothy L. Sayers.) He also received communications from spiritualists trying to connect him with the spirit of his dead mother. One had a cross on it, an unlikely message from the wife of a rabbi.

    So anyway. One of Houdini's targets was spiritualist churches. He did quite a study on them, apparently, though I don't have most of the details handy. Of course, he himself couldn't go to these spiritualist churches, because they'd recognize him in an instant, so he sent a woman who worked for him, and lo and behold, the woman became not merely a member but, as I understand it, ordained by quite a few of those churches.

    Under the name of Mrs. F. Raud.

    While it is true that a seance is held every year on the day of Houdini's death in an attempt to contact him, it is done so precisely because he did not believe it was possible to return from the dead. His wife was under very strict instructions not to allow any "spiritualist" to conduct the seance. She was to conduct it herself. As a further failsafe, ten words from a letter to Houdini by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle were chosen as the proof that it really was the spirit of Houdini. No seance has ever been successful.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  3. #183
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,430
    Moonrock
    Just curious, but why don't you use your powers to predict lottery numbers? Or maybe you could contact the ghost of Jimmy Hoffa --- find out where his body is buried, that'd be pretty cool.

    Or maybe contact Amelia Earhardt -- you'd be pretty famous if you could definitively find her plane. If that doesn't work, there's always D.B. Cooper --- find out if he survived the parachute landing, and where the money is.

    You see, what I don't understand is why spiritualists don't use their powers for something useful. They're always "revealing" that person A's father was named Pete, that he always loved his wife and that he's sorry. They never reveal the murderer's name, or where a robber hid the money, or whether anyone was shooting from the grassy knoll.

    edited to correct spelling
    Last edited by pghnative; 2006-Jan-04 at 09:08 PM.

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,743
    Amelia Earhart is dancing the hula hula with Cthulhu and Godzilla. In the Bermuda Triangle.

    Erm, or so Tom Smith tells me.

    But y'see, I can come up with a perfectly "logical" reason that they don't predict lottery numbers: They hear what the ghosts want to tell them, and they can't just turn their ability "on" or "off" as they please. It's the perfect greased pig explanation.

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Posts
    7,503
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren
    No seance has ever been successful.
    Of course not. I certainly hope, that if I claimed something was impossible, you wouldn't accept my failure to do it as any sort of evidence that I was right.


  6. #186
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,610
    Quote Originally Posted by pghnative
    Moonrock
    Just curious, but why don't you use your powers to predict lottery numbers?
    Yeah, I've often wondered this - why no medium will ever come out with the numbers to next week's Lotto draw - just for yuks. The standard answer is that psychics are so pure of heart that they refuse to use their gifts in this way for financial profit. Which usually leads me to ask why they charge people for consultations...

  7. #187
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by paulie jay
    Yeah, I've often wondered this - why no medium will ever come out with the numbers to next week's Lotto draw - just for yuks. The standard answer is that psychics are so pure of heart that they refuse to use their gifts in this way for financial profit. Which usually leads me to ask why they charge people for consultations...
    That's a great post!

  8. #188
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren
    No seance has ever been successful.
    Pro-spirtualists would put an absurd "...yet" at the end of that last sentance.

    Just as the pro-ETI cult would say: (contrary to Fermi's Observation) "No contact has every been made...YET"

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Add this, Gillianren has been wrong with her knowledge. No one ever questions her direction, though, which confuses me.
    I STEP UP AND CHALLENGE GILLIANREN TO HER POSTS (PLEASE PROVIDE LINKS) when answering questions.

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,095
    Quote Originally Posted by paulie jay
    Yeah, I've often wondered this - why no medium will ever come out with the numbers to next week's Lotto draw - just for yuks. The standard answer is that psychics are so pure of heart that they refuse to use their gifts in this way for financial profit. Which usually leads me to ask why they charge people for consultations...
    There's a Roald Dahl book about this, sort of. The main character manages to learn to see through cards, so he can always win at blackjack (or poker or whatever he played... I haven't read the book in fifteen years or so). But when he tries to use his power for his own personal gain, he's completely impotent. He can't see the cards. He only gets the power back once he determines that he'll only use his knowledge for good.

    It's as likely an explanation as any, I suppose.

  11. #191
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Add this, Gillianren has been wrong with her knowledge. No one ever questions her direction, though, which confuses me.
    I STEP UP AND CHALLENGE GILLIANREN TO HER POSTS (PLEASE PROVIDE LINKS) when answering questions.
    Unfortunately, you're requesting a proof for a negative which is impossible.
    At least if I figured out which post you're referring to.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  12. #192
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Add this, Gillianren has been wrong with her knowledge. No one ever questions her direction, though, which confuses me.
    I STEP UP AND CHALLENGE GILLIANREN TO HER POSTS (PLEASE PROVIDE LINKS) when answering questions.
    I stated very clearly in that post that the information came from a History Channel special. (It had Teller on it in silhouette, on account of he was talking.) What's more, very little of my knowledge comes from the internet; it comes from (primarily) books. I can give you book titles, but you'd have to do a wee bit more work in order to find the information than just click on something.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  13. #193
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by HenrikOlsen
    Unfortunately, you're requesting a proof for a negative which is impossible.
    At least if I figured out which post you're referring to.
    I've only noticed this recently. I first noticed it in the BAUT Frapp Thread many moons ago. I've been watching since then, and I'm quite amazed at my discoveries. That's why I am speaking up. I know, I will get the black banner for this action.

  14. #194
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren
    I stated very clearly in that post that the information came from a History Channel special. (It had Teller on it in silhouette, on account of he was talking.) What's more, very little of my knowledge comes from the internet; it comes from (primarily) books. I can give you book titles, but you'd have to do a wee bit more work in order to find the information than just click on something.
    Case in point. You are rattling off information from your head without checking facts.

  15. #195
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    I've been watching you via BAUT. "I follow those I eventually will lead". Sorry, I had to use my old slogan.

  16. #196
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,743
    Quote Originally Posted by William_Thompson
    Pro-spirtualists would put an absurd "...yet" at the end of that last sentance.

    Just as the pro-ETI cult would say: (contrary to Fermi's Observation) "No contact has every been made...YET"
    Wow, nice way of sneaking that in there. This thread is not about ETI. This thread is not about SETI. This thread is not about contact with ETI. This thread has nothing to do with ETI at all. It has to with very terrestrial, but very unnatural, phenomena that supposedly exists.

    Please do not try to derail a thread to push an agenda.

  17. #197
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    It's derailed!

  18. #198
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Unsubscribing! If you wish to talk about this subject, please send me a PM.

  19. #199
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Case in point. You are rattling off information from your head without checking facts.
    She says she's gone, but I'd like to know how, exactly, she knew I wasn't checking facts. Because I don't have a website to link to? That's true. However, I'm not sure why I'd need one to state what I saw on TV two days ago.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  20. #200
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,516
    Quote Originally Posted by William_Thompson
    Just as the pro-ETI cult would say: (contrary to Fermi's Observation) "No contact has every been made...YET"

    Please do not hijack this thread.

    Also folks, I can see this may become personal quickly. Please calm down.

  21. #201
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,610
    Quote Originally Posted by snarkophilus
    There's a Roald Dahl book about this, sort of. The main character manages to learn to see through cards, so he can always win at blackjack (or poker or whatever he played... I haven't read the book in fifteen years or so). But when he tries to use his power for his own personal gain, he's completely impotent. He can't see the cards. He only gets the power back once he determines that he'll only use his knowledge for good.

    It's as likely an explanation as any, I suppose.
    A good idea, but still doesn't explain why their powers work when they charge a fee for consultations though

  22. #202
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    25,732
    Quote Originally Posted by SeanF
    Of course not. I certainly hope, that if I claimed something was impossible, you wouldn't accept my failure to do it as any sort of evidence that I was right.

    I think there has been confusion about what I meant. No seance to contact Houdini, the person about whom I was talking, has met the tests that Houdini himself established for them before death.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  23. #203
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Lonewulf
    Amelia Earhart is dancing the hula hula with Cthulhu and Godzilla. In the Bermuda Triangle.

    Erm, or so Tom Smith tells me.
    Not hijacking the thread - just borrowing it for a quick trip to Correctionland

    Earhart wasn't lost in the triangle - but somewhere over the pacific. (if she DID end up in the triangle, her piloting skills were worse than usual)


    We now return you to your regularly scheduled slugfes... er,... thread

  24. #204
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,743
    Quote Originally Posted by LurchGS
    Not hijacking the thread - just borrowing it for a quick trip to Correctionland

    Earhart wasn't lost in the triangle - but somewhere over the pacific. (if she DID end up in the triangle, her piloting skills were worse than usual)


    We now return you to your regularly scheduled slugfes... er,... thread
    I never said she did. She just ended up in the Bermuda Triangle. I don't know how. Maybe she took a boat there. 'sides, it makes the song "Bermuda Triangle" by Tom Smith that much funnier.

  25. #205
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Lonewulf
    I never said she did. She just ended up in the Bermuda Triangle. I don't know how. Maybe she took a boat there. 'sides, it makes the song "Bermuda Triangle" by Tom Smith that much funnier.

    ok.. I'll take your word for it (she'd be the only missing person who traveled TO the triangle after vanishing).

    Though.. come to think of it.. given her adequate skills as a pilot, I suppose it IS possible she got lost and ended up there anyway. Would explain why nobody's found any sign of her in all those empty, barren, featureless miles of the Pacific ocean

  26. #206
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    579
    I wonder if that's where all my socks and sunglasses have ended up?

  27. #207
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    nope - they're at my house.

    [whisper] have you ever considered odor-eaters? [/whipser]

  28. #208
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    16,686

    Re: Do scientists see ghosts?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lonewulf
    I never said she did. She just ended up in the Bermuda Triangle. I don't know how. Maybe she took a boat there. 'sides, it makes the song "Bermuda Triangle" by Tom Smith that much funnier.
    It's called "poetic license", or as with the case of some lyricists, "poetic license to kill."

    Back to the main schlagfest, uh, topic.

    Of course scientists see ghosts. Scientists see UFOs. Scientists see holy images on taco shells.

    The difference is the scientist doesn't stop at that point and say "I can't figure this out, so therefore it's supernatural." The scientist doesn't say, "Well this is new to me so I'll jump to a fully-unsupported conclusion based on incomplete data, shaky assumptions, and my gut instincts." The scientist definitely doesn't say, "This is something science will never figure out."

    Instead the scientist dives into the hard of work of figuring out exactly what the currently unexplained phenomenon is. With the taco shell, ghosts, and UFOs, the process is pretty quick and for the most part, the work has already been done. With such things as unified forces, dark matter and energy, and the origin(s) of the Universe, it takes considerably more time and work, and lots of innovation.

  29. #209
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by R.A.F.
    Not really...it's still an anecdote, a story without any evidence. As such it proves nothing.
    Hmmm, couldnt we say that about anything that we didnt see with our own eyes? I dont know, theres no pleasing some people.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren
    While it is true that a seance is held every year on the day of Houdini's death in an attempt to contact him, it is done so precisely because he did not believe it was possible to return from the dead. His wife was under very strict instructions not to allow any "spiritualist" to conduct the seance. She was to conduct it herself. As a further failsafe, ten words from a letter to Houdini by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle were chosen as the proof that it really was the spirit of Houdini. No seance has ever been successful.
    If a spiritualist or medium was not allowed to run the séance then how do you suggest that the message could be received? I could also make such claims and say that I want a scientific investigation into the Apollo hoax, as long as no scientists are involved. Doh!

    Quote Originally Posted by pghnative
    Moonrock
    Just curious, but why don't you use your powers to predict lottery numbers? Or maybe you could contact the ghost of Jimmy Hoffa --- find out where his body is buried, that'd be pretty cool.

    Or maybe contact Amelia Earhardt -- you'd be pretty famous if you could definitively find her plane. If that doesn't work, there's always D.B. Cooper --- find out if he survived the parachute landing, and where the money is.

    You see, what I don't understand is why spiritualists don't use their powers for something useful. They're always "revealing" that person A's father was named Pete, that he always loved his wife and that he's sorry. They never reveal the murderer's name, or where a robber hid the money, or whether anyone was shooting from the grassy knoll.

    edited to correct spelling
    You misunderstand the ability of mediumship. A medium CANNOT ask for specific people to make contact. It’s the spirit who decides to contact the medium, not the other way around. And the gift of mediumship is given as a gift, it is not there to make money – money has no meaning to the spirit world so why should they give lottery numbers? And before you come back and say ‘if mediumship isn’t to make money, why are so many doing it on the TV’, my answer is that those people are not what I class as a true medium.

    My brother who attends sprititualist church twice a week related to me how his teacher a couple of weeks ago even told a family that she could smell the aftershave of their dead son and named the brand. Hardly a case of cold reading there? The big problem you see is that your all 'assuming' that all mediums work like the ones you see on TV. They do not.

    If you want real proof go down your local spiritualist church, in fact I challenge anyone here to do so. You will soon change your narrowmindedness.

    For all your information, a proper medium DOES NOT charge for readings.

    And finally, I can link to an article that I tried to post here last week which shows that a well qualified scientist carried out scientific study into this phenomenon with many scientists as witnesses. You may be shocked by the results.

    http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/bo...r/chapter5.htm
    Last edited by Moonrock; 2006-Jan-05 at 02:46 PM.

  30. #210
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    981
    Quote Originally Posted by Moonrock
    For all your information, a proper medium DOES NOT charge for readings.
    Why not?

Similar Threads

  1. Do you believe in Ghosts ?
    By kevin1981 in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 164
    Last Post: 2010-Nov-18, 11:33 AM
  2. I don't believe in ghosts. Really !
    By Raptor1967 in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 2007-Apr-19, 02:21 PM
  3. Ghosts of Phuket
    By Cylinder in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2005-Jun-27, 07:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •