Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Inertial dampening?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,534

    Inertial dampening?

    Would it be possible to counteract the effects of high geforces on manned space flights, or even provide artificial gravity, using this?

    http://www.hfml.ru.nl/froglev.html

    Given that it takes 16 teslas to counter the weight of a small frog (in microgravity, surely this could also give it the same effective weight as if it were on earth?) it might consume quite a bit of juice doing the same with humans.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    4,115
    Quote Originally Posted by Damburger
    Would it be possible to counteract the effects of high geforces on manned space flights, or even provide artificial gravity, using this?

    http://www.hfml.ru.nl/froglev.html

    Given that it takes 16 teslas to counter the weight of a small frog (in microgravity, surely this could also give it the same effective weight as if it were on earth?) it might consume quite a bit of juice doing the same with humans.
    I guess you'd have to be very careful not to have any metal from accidents or operations in your body.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,534
    Quote Originally Posted by kucharek
    I guess you'd have to be very careful not to have any metal from accidents or operations in your body.
    Indeed. 16 Teslas + surgical steel bolted to your thigh bone = pain

    It would probably best operate like the booth things they have in Event Horizon You go in them naked for the duration of the acceleration.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    11,562
    Dampening? is this idea all wet?

    What about the differences in properties among the body constituent parts and fluids? Wouldn't that cause internal separation? Not as extreme as surgical steel pins, sure, but we're talking large fields, right?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,534
    Quote Originally Posted by hhEb09'1
    Dampening? is this idea all wet?

    What about the differences in properties among the body constituent parts and fluids? Wouldn't that cause internal separation? Not as extreme as surgical steel pins, sure, but we're talking large fields, right?
    Watch the video. Apparantly the frog didn't mind too much.

    From what I understand, water is what is responding to the magnetic field, and all body tissues have water in common. Thus theres no problem.

  6. #6

    Dutch Frog

    That must be one confused frog.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,075
    Quote Originally Posted by Damburger
    Would it be possible to counteract the effects of high geforces on manned space flights, or even provide artificial gravity, using this?
    The large 13 Telsa solenoid would be accelerated in the same frame-reference as the levitee inside, so I don't see how inertial dampening would be possible.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,534
    Quote Originally Posted by tlbs101
    The large 13 Telsa solenoid would be accelerated in the same frame-reference as the levitee inside, so I don't see how inertial dampening would be possible.
    It would have to be possible because it is possible to counteract gravity in this way.

    The magnet would simply pull the occupant in the opposite direction to the geeforces they were experiencing. If it mattered that the magnet itself were being accelerated the same as the occupant, the thing wouldn't work on Earth either would it?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,250
    And it would take Orion to launch the thing and the powerplant needed to run it.

    Fine by me!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    Yes, this was done a few years ago, and I mentioned it in another thread yesterday. From here:

    http://www.hfml.science.ru.nl/phystod.html

    Just because an object can levitate does not mean that it will when placed in a strong enough magnetic field. The right conditions are surprisingly subtle; for instance, even an increase of only a few percent in magnetic field will normally destabilise levitation and cause the object to fall.
    So it is tricky, and sounds like it requires a lot of room (the levitation area is relatively small). But:

    The most distinctive advantage of room-temperature diamagnetic levitation, however, is that - unlike any other known or feasible technique including superconducting levitation 9- the suspension is distributed uniformly over the bulk.
    It does go on to say it isn't perfectly uniform. As for magnetic materials in the body:

    Biological systems are astonishingly homogeneous with respect to diamagnetic levitation: Seemingly diverse components such as water, tissues, bones and blood differ in their values of c /r by only several percent,11 which implies that gravity is compensated to better than 0.1g throughout a complex living organism. Further, even if paramagnetic molecules and ions are present, as in blood, they contribute only to the average susceptibility; their strong response to the field is smeared out by temperature (mBB << kT), Brownian motion and a much stronger coupling to the surrounding diamagnetic molecules.11 Probably, the alignment of very long biomolecules along the field direction is the magnetic effect most likely to obscure true microgravity in complex systems.
    As for levitating people:

    According to magnet designers from the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Tallahassee, Florida, existing technology can accommodate objects up to about 15 cm. However, levitating a human would require a special racetrack magnet of almost 40 Tesla and about one GW of continuous power consumption.
    In theory, yes, you could build a gravity compensator big enough for a person, but it would require powerful, huge magnets. So far they appear to be fairly benign on living creatures, but if you wanted to compensate for (say) 20 or 30 Gs, it might be a different story. Then again, we aren't going to have constant boost ships doing that until there are some fundamental advances, so there is no rush.

    If somehow it could be made compact, with low power requirements, you could imagine a compensator in a fighter jet. I see no chance of that happening, however.

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,258
    Sorry, but this whole idea is all wet, for many reasons.

    1. Anyone with any metal would be exempt (fillings, even excessive abberations of iron in their blood over time as it would pull their hair out by it's roots).

    2. The weight of the equipment far exceeds wet-couches, in which humans immerse themselves in D5W and endure the G's as one with the world. Up to 5, at least, long-duration. Want longer duration? Perfect a hydrocarbon breathing solution with a specific gravity equal to the human body, and you're in there! Up to 25 Gs.

    I appears 2 reasons are enough!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn
    In theory, yes, you could build a gravity compensator big enough for a person, but it would require powerful, huge magnets. So far they appear to be fairly benign on living creatures, but if you wanted to compensate for (say) 20 or 30 Gs, it might be a different story. Then again, we aren't going to have constant boost ships doing that until there are some fundamental advances, so there is no rush.
    I agree, if you've the technology to go fast enough to need this, you've the technology to build it.

    If somehow it could be made compact, with low power requirements, you could imagine a compensator in a fighter jet. I see no chance of that happening, however.
    Thats not unreasonable - I'm guessing that bursts of very high magnetism are easier to produce than a constant field.

Similar Threads

  1. The postulate that the laws are the same in all inertial frames
    By Ken G in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 2010-Feb-11, 07:01 AM
  2. Inertial Gravity Field
    By rodin in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 2009-Aug-29, 01:37 PM
  3. Inertial Frames
    By eric_marsh in forum Astronomy Cast
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2007-Jul-13, 02:29 AM
  4. inertial field theory.
    By madman in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 2006-Sep-03, 12:55 PM
  5. Inertial Mass
    By rahuldandekar in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2004-Dec-08, 01:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •