Laser reflectors

http://almagest.as.utexas.edu/~rlr/mlrs.html

Sure? | Never
this2 | could
could | make
justB | any
a LIE | sence
so U. | of
TEST4 | range
the.. | data
RIGHT | 2-9-08

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-08 18:39 ]</font> http://www.csr.utexas.edu/mlrs/030823
ftp://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/slr/slrql/moon/ it still make no sence to me

[GrapesOfWrath]

Hum
bert
I'm
sure

On 2001-12-21 10:13, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To: 1-12-22 9:25 A.M. & 2-5-18 1:00 A.M.
Hum ..| its just: BERT ? thats...| I tried an MP3 player
bert..| not easy: the MP3 I got..| its no conclusive
I'm ..| to line.: so it looks....| so i donno
sure .| thigs up: like you knew..| but it had a spec .| (whoohh)

????????: the joke back then already
I did do a gnuplot of apogee/periogee just ... I need to run another A/P
to start things out and long B4 i get to LIE... if only i can remeber "HOW"
one point. I could use a 60 lines somewhen L8R
HUb' says: 2-5-18 1:02 A.M. BART .MP3 30888 0518
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2001-12-22 10:58 ]</font>
what did HOW maen in algonequine anyway.. Was that the General?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-05-18 05:04 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-05-22 11:28 ]</font>

<pre>
* * * APOGEE * *
405000 * * * * * * * * * *

370000 *251 JD2452xxx *445 445-251=194
*225 PERIGEE *470 Days M:Max
365000 *277 *418
*198 *498
360000 *305 *390 *526
Pr:Ar=4:1 333* *362 554* *583 </pre>
So this was my first effort at ploting some
lunar datum? the numbers i used were generated by
a perigee program from http://www.skypub.com/resources/soft...sic/basic.html

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2001-12-23 11:16 ]</font>

[GrapesOfWrath]

I think you forgot your end-pre html again.

On 2001-12-22 11:42, GrapesOfWrath wrote:
I think you forgot your end-pre html again.

Yeah, and then i forgot user name & pword
oh well, I 4get easily, now where was I
Saturns Ring Rate(Srr) perigee periods Pp.
and trying to decode U.T. hmm? well not today
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...=303&forum=1&2
[96]PERIAP.BAS Nov 87, p. 527 Compute lunar apogee and perigee

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2001-12-26 10:59 ]</font>

a) convert the range in units of picoseconds to seconds :1
<pre>b) divide the result in a) by 2 :2
c) multiply the result in b) by the speed of light, :3
(299792458 m/s) {{ any clues to get 400Mm appri }} ::4
000010001357708024195320-000199200000002302465105055171 :5
#######YYdddttttttttttttididsspp<-az--><-el->|=Range11=|:6
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 1234 :7
| | | | i got 779,998 Km |. , , .:8
360050000002 way way to far?/? 52035998000:9
</pre> 9:35 A.M. anyway the cruxt of this tail
should be just how far away do those "TEXANS"
THINK THEIR DATA SHOWS THE MOON TO BE?
{now back to}
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...=303&forum=1&2
sheaped Moon and :tp|c(s{g[r "? how many ?

On 2001-12-26 11:07, HUb' wrote: To: 1-12-28 HUb'
:Like i've already said someWHERE else
4me the big Con was NOT having made the
Lunar Rovers Remote controlable
Booooooooo.... Boooo... Booo..
Do you hear me! Boo. How Stupid do {oh never mind}
i still get 780Mm out of 5.? seconds round trip
any clues as to whats REALLY going on
| | | | i got 779,998 Km |. , , .:8
360050000002 way way to far?/? 52035998000:9
</pre> 9:35 A.M. anyway the cruxt of this tail
should be just how far away do those "TEXANS"
THINK THEIR DATA SHOWS THE MOON TO BE?
{now back to}
http://almagest.as.utexas.edu/~rlr/mlrs.html

[Valiant Dancer]

On 2001-12-26 11:07, HUb' wrote:
a) convert the range in units of picoseconds to seconds :1
<pre>b) divide the result in a) by 2 :2
c) multiply the result in b) by the speed of light, :3
(299792458 m/s) {{ any clues to get 400Mm appri }} ::4
000010001357708024195320-000199200000002302465105055171 :5
#######YYdddttttttttttttididsspp<-az--><-el->|=Range11=|:6
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 1234 :7
| | | | i got 779,998 Km |. , , .:8
360050000002 way way to far?/? 52035998000:9
</pre> 9:35 A.M. anyway the cruxt of this tail
should be just how far away do those "TEXANS"
THINK THEIR DATA SHOWS THE MOON TO BE?
{now back to}
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...=303&forum=1&2
sheaped Moon and :tp|c(s{g[r "? how many ?

Dude,
I think the 35 picoseconds number refers to the precision of error of the time elapsed reading. (roughly 17.5 picoseconds one way.)

On 2001-12-28 13:57, Valiant Dancer wrote: To: 2:24 P.M. PST

000010001357708024195320-000199200000002302465105055171 :5
#######YYdddttttttttttttididsspp<-az--><-el->|=Range11=|:6







http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...=303&forum=1&2
sheaped Moon and :tp|c(s{g[r "? how many ?

Dude,
I think the 35 picoseconds number refers to the precision of error of the time elapsed reading. (roughly 17.5 picoseconds one way.)
2:25 P.M. HUb': well i think you spell pico
and second Both correctly. However they have another line after the line I left and

the first number on that line {i think} `poised to be .1 PS

[quote]
On 2001-12-23 11:21, HUb' wrote:

On 2001-12-22 11:42, GrapesOfWrath wrote:
I think you forgot your end-pre html again.

Yeah, and then i forgot user name & pword

January 2, 2002 6:34 A.M. PST
by now there a roomers { after Oregon's win }
in Colorado of the Feista, that the Pres
[G.W. BUsh] may be on his way
the local Po`Ticks are Demo's
and there should be Quite a "Fashion Clash",
as the D`s `M {rich} & R's `M [ ] ?

[quote]
On 2001-12-28 13:57, Valiant Dancer wrote: &2: 6:54 A.M. 2-1-02

On 2001-12-26 11:07, HUb' wrote:
HUb' January 2, 2002 6:55 A.M. pst
on second reading
1 SEE ? G below
2 I cant see where
3 you get your 35
4 from? the only 35
5 I saw in the data
6 was from the day
7 string
8000010001357708024195320-000
9#######YYdddttttttttttttidid
A where ..^^^ 357 days of 365 / year shows?
B Because now i just get
C Alert!: Unable to connect to FTP host.
D from those nasa Tyxans I cannot get data
E to see .^^^. that thats now 002 today
F or maybe003 tomorrow BUT I see 5 [Seconds] "Round" trip
Dude,
I think the 35 picoseconds number refers to the precision of error of the time elapsed reading. (roughly 17.5 picoseconds one way.)
:7:03 A.M. HUb' and cannot see?
where you get your 35's from

and anyway 17.5 300,000 = 525 a Miss'ed Q 4 me?

#######YYdddttttttttttttididsspp<-az--><-el->|=Range11=|
000010001357708024195320-000199200000002302465105055171
000010302008708024195320-000195100000002062465102261081P365|2n
00001030200978457801532000155625000030012127641015 21251 1
00001030200978457801532000155632000030011527641028 41321 2
00001030200978457801532000155633000030011727641034 21301 3
http://almagest.as.utexas.edu/~rlr/mlrs.html ^LOOKs LikeA405|18
ftp://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/slr/slrql/moon Tails change?
ftp://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/slr/slr...2/new_ql020109
January 12, 2002 | JD2452287 | 12 KAN 2 MUAN

NO. i DO not KNOW! its a big change from
5.1 seconds to 4.1 "SECONDS"
5.1/2*300=765Km
4.1/2*300=615Km exactly why I do NOT
400/300=1&1/3*2=2&2/3 expect know I do not KNOW
So the number that I think I but I do know
should be getting From ELgin I don't know
would be ????????????????????????????????????2666666666
#######YYdddttttttttttttididsspp<-az--><-el->|=Range11=|
January 12, 2002 | JD2452287 | 12 KAN 2 MUAN maybe you can try to get: http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...c=419&forum1&2

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-01-13 12:52 ]</font>

[ToSeek]

The laser reflectors are still being used:

Measuring Moon Distance To Thickness Of A Paperclip

On 2002-01-15 10:11, ToSeek wrote: To: 2:37 A.M. 2-1-17
The laser reflectors are still being used:

Measuring Moon Distance To Thickness Of A Paperclip

HUb' 2:37 A.M. Thanks for the link
However i'll be going 4HARD data
Which BeeCause Moon datas now delayed i'll Try a Geosync One

<a name="pacwest2"> 2-1-17 PAGE NAME pacwest2
On 2002-01-17 04:09, HUb' wrote: To: 10:55 A.M.
<pre>
On 2002-01-15 10:11, ToSeek wrote: To: 2:37 A.M. 2-1-17 & 10:55 A.M. 2-1-17
Nov 21 14:58 Directory [64]westpac
ftp://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/slr/slrql/westpac/2002
98043010200978393402532000151963000000002233091002 10301
98043010200978393402532000151969000003002233091002 10391
980430102012709005135320001027490000-200263302100380181
#######YYdddttttttttttttididsspp<-az--><-el->|==Range==|
TRYING TO FIND A geostationary with unvairing RANGE
{note this message Till next edition
has a [pre beginning but no [/pr ending |Ed1@ 11:00 A.M. PST 2-1-17

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-01-17 12:29 ]</font>

[quote]
On 2001-12-22 11:05, HUb' wrote:
<pre> OK 2-1-28 2:01 A.M. this was the 1 to Quote
i'll leave out the far distance as > 400,000 Km
upload " 362>3 28" jd 2452k 362 = Feb 28th
and point to this "Quake Focus day? from that
370000 *251 JD2452xxx *445 445-251=194
*225 PERIGEE *470 Days M:Max
365000 *277 *418
*198 *498
360000 *305 *390 *526
Pr:Ar=4:1 333* *362 554* *583 </pre>
ratchit ratchit . . . . . .^three sixty two
now notice that the moon has been distant
for a long long while & will be Close, close
by 333 & 362. So Earth has pent up force
just awaiting for to be triggered
& the 333 362 390 ( 90 day period ) should make TV news

[GrapesOfWrath]

Are you saying that day 333 is January 30, 2002, and 362 is February 28, and 390 is March 28? And something newsworthy will happen on those dates?

Update: I see in this thread that you think there will be an earthquake on Mar. 28. Of course there will be an earthquake on Mar. 28--there are many earthquakes every day. How big an earthquake--that is the question.

<font size=-1>[Added Update]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: GrapesOfWrath on 2002-01-28 07:25 ]</font>

<a name="20020128a"> this page name was 20020128a
On 2002-01-28 07:13, GrapesOfWrath wrote:
Are you saying that day 333 is January 30, 2002, and 362 is February 28, and 390 is March 28? And something newsworthy will happen on those dates?
Full moon days with Perigee within 1 day?
Update: I see in this thread that you think there will be an earthquake on Mar. 28. Of course there will be an earthquake on Mar. 28--there are many earthquakes every day. How big an earthquake--that is the question.
9:23 P.M. Yes? i'll try harder to get the page's Named
<font size=-1>[Added Update]</font>
{a name="hubspost"} replace { with less than etc
The Quake's usually occure 2 days befor the
date given For the "FULL" moon & also 2 after So its Say six Sixes except one miss so I say five 5.6's = Many & big {in 90 days}

[GrapesOfWrath]

The Quake's usually occure 2 days befor the
date given For the "FULL" moon & also 2 after So its Say six Sixes except one miss so I say five 5.6's = Many & big {in 90 days}

In 90 days?

Are you saying that there will be six 5.6 magnitude earthquakes, two days before and after the full moon? Each of the next three full moons?

<a name="20020129b"> page 20020129b {aka 5.6's}
On 2002-01-28 23:35, GrapesOfWrath wrote:

The Quake's usually occure 2 days befor the
date given For the "FULL" moon & also 2 after So its Say six Sixes except one miss so I say five 5.6's = Many & big {in 90 days}

In 90 days?
11:23 A.M. YES, Yes ..., precisely at the Time You State
Are you saying that there will be six 5.6 magnitude earthquakes, two days before and after the full moon? Each of the next three full moons?
[/quote] because theres "pent up" look4 a 6 or 9?

<a name="20020203.2:08"> page 20020203.2:08
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...t=25#20020129a
Clearly? the 8. China symptom
whever thats at leaves me trying to play catchup
I did try2 post some other links yesterday
but got delayed 2long to enter
http://www.geophys.washington.edu/SEIS/fingerquake.html
http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk/quakexe/quakes
try those 2 for the China 8
2:12 A.M. PST | 8 CIMI 4 PAX

May 18, 2002 push to page 1 ?
well? i never could understand
the laser range data, it jumps around, and seams wrong.
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...t=25#20020129a
no at this time i dont know where that goes

May 18, 2002 push to page 1 ?
& AGAIN September 12, 2002 ? 3:27 P.M. pst
------------------------------------------
Listen? if you do read this "BEWARE"
its the only current LUNAR data i know of
IF THERES OTHER {data "from" the Moon}
leave a link? [anyway lunar RANGE data] never
did compute for me: then again i hadonly slight interest

May 18, 2002 push to page 1 ?
&amp; AGAIN September 12, 2002 ? 3:27 P.M. pst
------------------------------------------
Listen? if you do read this "BEWARE"
its the only current LUNAR data i know of
IF THERES OTHER {data "from" the Moon}
leave a link? [anyway lunar RANGE data] never
did compute for me: then again i hadonly slight interest

push to page 1 10:58 am PDT Friday 8/22 '03 {BWUW}
---------------------------------------------------------------
like i said above the DATA I looked at comming out of Texas
never made one bit of sence to me
========================
i've seen other references to Lunar Laser
but never found :"DATA": i understood {OR believed}
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::
the reason I PUSHED this up today
was i saw some one raising the Question
???????????????????????????????????????????
for my part i'll just say {SO GLAD} the Author search
is back as an actve part of BABB { and then Babbel off to Bad }

naturally (ORANGE)

going up from Violet

back to my CHerrished CON (Vik's beet A&amp;M by 14)

9/23 yeah?
twas a push for density 2 (um rails){maybe}

[HUb']

7:24 am PDT Fri 9/26 2003
its difficult for me to explain: HOWEVER:

what happend ? on the line above ... I do not know?
maybe hit the tab key? back to trying to exp;ain
Z:\MSI\Maple9
less than an HOUR /2 ago in the TEK.LAB i did find
Maple 9 listed on the Z: drive (REMember here we look4 R)
if i discover a way to make this 9 a link i'll do it THEN
in the mean time see the post "ABOVE" this one maybe?