Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Artificial Gravity

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2
    My question is fairly straightforward but I cannot seam to find an answer that does not require a degree in higher mathematics. What is the simplified formula to compute the artificial gravity on a spinning space station? If the station is 1000 meters across and rotating at 1 rpm what is the gravity? And does that scale up, would a 1500 meter station rotating at 1.5 rpms have the same gravity?

    Blessed Be,
    Charles Sizemore
    rkfinley@earthlink.net
    http://home.earthlink.net/~rkfinley/
    Morality; is doing the right thing and not caring if any one is watching.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    27
    This is a fairly straight-forward problem, once you have the main equation. The equation that you need is the equation for centripetal force -

    F = m W^2 r

    or, perhaps more usefully, in terms of acceleration,

    a = W^2 r

    where F is force, a is acceleration, W is angular velocity (in radians per second) and r is the radius of the rotation.

    To create a centripetal force equal to gravity, the acceleration must be equal to 10 m/s/s. Using the numbers you give above, the 'gravity' would be as follows:

    1 rpm = 0.01666 rev per second = 0.105 radians per second

    a = (0.105)^2 x 1000
    a = 11.025 m/s/s

    So, gravity would be a bit too strong in this space station. As you can see from the equations, the alternative station that you describe (1500m, 1.5 rpm) would have much stronger artificial gravity - in fact, it would be 37m/s/s - almost 4 times normal gravity!
    The larger the wheel is, the slower it needs to rotate to give the same effective gravity.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    455
    It has not much to do with higher math, only with understanding the basic principles of gravity.

    - 1 g = 9,8 m/s*s, which is nothing more then accelleration.
    - On a spinning wheel, the a always happens towards the center of the wheel.
    - the formula for a is: a = v*v/r.
    - the formula for v is: v = 2 * pi * r / Totaal time for one rotation.

    Combining the formulas would give you:
    a = 39,5 * (r / T^2)
    .... (to calculate it in gees, just divide a by g.)

    As you can see in the Formula, a is dependend of (r/T^2)
    To achieve the same a with different radius, you only have to make sure that:
    (r1/T1^2) = (r2/T2^2) or T2^2 = T1^2 * (r2 / r1)

    As you can see from T2^2 = T1^2 * (r2 / r1), your assumption is not correct.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2
    Originally posted by SpaceErnie@Apr 27 2004, 08:29 AM
    This is a fairly straight-forward problem, once you have the main equation. The equation that you need is the equation for centripetal force -

    F = m W^2 r

    or, perhaps more usefully, in terms of acceleration,

    a = W^2 r

    where F is force, a is acceleration, W is angular velocity (in radians per second) and r is the radius of the rotation.

    To create a centripetal force equal to gravity, the acceleration must be equal to 10 m/s/s. Using the numbers you give above, the 'gravity' would be as follows:

    1 rpm = 0.01666 rev per second = 0.105 radians per second

    a = (0.105)^2 x 1000
    a = 11.025 m/s/s

    So, gravity would be a bit too strong in this space station. As you can see from the equations, the alternative station that you describe (1500m, 1.5 rpm) would have much stronger artificial gravity - in fact, it would be 37m/s/s - almost 4 times normal gravity!
    The larger the wheel is, the slower it needs to rotate to give the same effective gravity.
    Man a realy regret not paying attintion in math class, I am about to ask some really dumb questions but that is the only way to correct my ignorance.

    > This is a fairly straight-forward problem, once you have the main equation.
    > The equation that you need is the equation for centripetal force -
    >
    > F = m W^2 r

    ? F is force, and W is angular velocity, a radian is 57.3 degrees, what are m and ^

    > or, perhaps more usefully, in terms of acceleration,
    >
    > a = W^2 r
    >
    > where F is force, a is acceleration, W is angular velocity (in radians per
    > second)and r is the radius of the rotation.
    >
    > To create a centripetal force equal to gravity, the acceleration must be
    > equal to 10 m/s/s. Using the numbers you give above, the 'gravity' would
    > be as follows:

    ? m/s/s

    > 1 rpm = 0.01666 rev per second = 0.105 radians per second

    ? how did you get the 0.01666 revs per second

    > a = (0.105)^2 x 1000
    > a = 11.025 m/s/s
    >
    > So, gravity would be a bit too strong in this space station. As you can see
    > from the equations, the alternative station that you describe (1500m, 1.5
    > rpm) would have much stronger artificial gravity - in fact, it would be
    > 37m/s/s - almost 4 times normal gravity!
    >
    > The larger the wheel is, the slower it needs to rotate to give the same
    > effective gravity.

    Sorry for any frusteration at my stupidity and thank you for your response.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,555
    The ^2 means squared. For example, 10^2 = 10 x 10 = 100, or you may need to cube a number, 3^3 = 3 x 3 x3 =27.

    m = mass.

    In the equation, you would multiply the mass, times the angular velocity squared, times the radius (one half of the distance across the widest part of the wheel) of the wheel.

    If I I remember my physics classes correctly:

    m/s/s is meter per second per second, Earth's gravity is 9.8 m/s/s. If you drop something it will accelerate towards Earth at 9.8 meters per second each second

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    300
    Question then. To shoot a rocket into space, you need to take this negative effect of 9.8 m/s/s into account. Basically, you have to move at a spped greater than 9.8 m/s/s in order to get any lift at all?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    455
    that's something you can calculate yourself sphinx.

    If you give a bullet an initial speed of X, then this speed will be reduced with ~10 m/s/s

    Say X = 900 m/s or three times the speed of sound.
    then it would take 90 seconds to reduce that speed to zero.

    Only thing you have to do is sum every speed the bullit has passed, (whole speeds is sufficient enough) and average them.

    So at first you have 900 m/s and at 90 seconds you have 0 m/s
    The most simple formula to sum sequential things up is:
    (first speed + last speed) multiplied by (half of total number of speeds or in this case seconds)

    (Sum 900 to 0) = 45 * 900 = 40.500 meters.

    So the bullet came only ~ 40,5 Km high in the Air.



    if you throw something up with an initial speed of 0,5 meters a second, it just gets less high.

Similar Threads

  1. Artificial gravity
    By adamskiiix in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 2010-Jun-30, 06:06 AM
  2. Gravity Simulator...no, it's not artificial gravity...
    By Charlie in Dayton in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2005-Aug-03, 03:52 PM
  3. Artificial Gravity
    By dmccarroll in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 2005-Mar-18, 03:41 AM
  4. What about artificial gravity?
    By sideways in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2003-Sep-19, 11:47 AM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2002-Aug-22, 10:02 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •