Figure 2 in your most recent post is one that I don't think I've seen in this thread before. Thanks for bringing something new.
I noticed, when I looked at this paper that one of its authors was Grevesse, whom you'd cited on numerous occasions. Yes, I had noticed that his paper contradicted your conclusions in some ways. I thought it represented a clear easy-to-read statement of the other side, with fifteen years improvement in the data and analysis from the 1989 paper you cite so often.
Forming opinions as we speak