How much longer now? Aren't the reptiloids doing anything?

[Paul Best]

I've only just stumbled onto the whole "Planet X" thing in the last few weeks. I've read a bit of both sides of the issue. (not quite so much zetatalk since I find that I can't read much without laughing)

Anyway, when is it going to hit?
Where might I look to see it?
What halucinogens are best for seeing aliens?

Fortunately I've not met anyone who actually believes (or even has heard) about this.

(ok now on to the more serious bit)

Unfortunately David Icke has a following in my home town, and also had my aunt reading his stuff. Are there any sites such as this one that debunks his theories in a easy to understand and free way?

[Psychostar]

Don't go bad mouthing aliens! And, as to that, "Where might I look to see it" question, look in your dreams cause it isn't ever going to happen.

[Superstring]

On 2002-09-03 18:42, Paul Best wrote:
Anyway, when is it going to hit?
Where might I look to see it?
What halucinogens are best for seeing aliens?

If it actually existed, it would hit in mid May 2003. But I'm telling you its all fake...there's simply NO scientific-based evidence whatsoever such a planet exists. None. Nada. Zilch.

[overrated]

There's some weirdness afoot. Didn't anybody notice that the first post in this thread was more than two months ago?

[sts60]

I imagine Psychostar, who apparently just started posting, decided to reply to this thread (despite the old date).

Actually, I think he's right - if you want to see Planet X, the best (well, the only) way is during some serious REM.

[Soupdragon]

Paul Best. Where is your town? On the Isle of White?

I've just checked out www.davidicke.com (good for a laugh) and I see no mention of Planet X. Funny that, he's not usually one to pass-up on appropriating any conspiracy for his own 'unified theory of everything'. :roll:

[Madcat]

"What Hallucinogens are best..."

Bwahahahahahah!

[WolfKC]

You think it's coinsidense that there's an eclipse tonight and the Matrix starts today? Actually PX hit last night and we're all just being kept alive in a big Zeta Matrix. :roll:
This stuff is to much fun. i dona wana see it end.

[Byrd]

Phil's got the best sites listed, but the best refutation is Nancy's site.

She posted multiple times that the infallibe Zetas said today would be the closest approach of the thing.

It's 2 times closer to us than Venus (according to her site)
It's 4 times the size of Venus (you know; the "evening star") which means ... 16 times brighter or brighter than the full moon. It has a red glowing atmosphere.

So tell her to go outside and ask her if she sees a second "sun" that stays in the sky -- anywhere -- that's glowing bright red and is brighter than the moon and almost as bright as the sun and about the size of her little fingertip when she holds her arms out straight in front of her.

(I have a rendition of what it "should" look like in my sigfile here.)

[Outcast]

Unfortunately David Icke has a following in my home town, and also had my aunt reading his stuff. Are there any sites such as this one that debunks his theories in a easy to understand and free way?

humm, there arent many. actually i've never seen noone debunking David Icke directly.
you see, most of the sceptics consider David a real crackpot to even bother. at least thats what they'll say when confronted with David's theories.
here's an advice, try to delve into the matter and debunk it yourself. it will be hard work though, since he covers a lot of ground.

my opinion is, David does make a lot of mistakes, some of them really gross mistakes due to misconceptions. specially in his first books.

but be carefull, David Icke is not ZT Nancy. you might find yourself realizing that much of what he says is actually true, and does make a lot of sense in the end. and then, humm, you might even turn paranoid... or something.