Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 52

Thread: Russian spaceliner

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,689

    Russian spaceliner

    Russia's Kliper Spacecraft Showcased in Paris

    Russia is touting the spacecraft as a replacement for their workhorse spacecraft, the Soyuz. Much like NASA’s Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), future destinations for the Kliper are said to be the International Space Station, the Moon, as well as Mars, according to Russian officials. It could also serve as an emergency rescue craft for space station crews.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182

  3. #3
    THere's a thread on this one in Babbling, but... :roll:

    Anyway let's continue here.

    From the conceptual design drawings, I was just wondering how rational/realistic the side windows on the rear seat row are. They seem to have little navigational use. So they're just "for fun"? (not like that's not a legit reason of course. If you're in space, you want to have seen it, back seat or not!).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicolas
    From the conceptual design drawings, I was just wondering how rational/realistic the side windows on the rear seat row are. They seem to have little navigational use. So they're just "for fun"? (not like that's not a legit reason of course. If you're in space, you want to have seen it, back seat or not!).
    From the article I saw, they seem to be convinced that the 4 seats will often be used for tourists. If so, then they would be very important.

    Is there any idea of added cost? Maybe its a "well for a little more, we'll throw in... :-# " fill in what you want :P

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,452
    US-Shuttle going to make a comeback but its career must end in 2010 and ISS will be assembled, but for manned flights the Russian project Kliper due might be an answer for Europe.

    http://www.euronews.net/create_html....pace&lng=1

    Kliper and Soyuz to launch from the French Space port in South America ?

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicolas
    THere's a thread on this one in Babbling, but... :roll:

    Anyway let's continue here.
    ToSeek was ToSeeked? [-(

    8-[

    with regards

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,032
    This is what the folks in Russia are saying

    Russian board or space-forum

    anyone know Russian ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by Launch window
    This is what the folks in Russia are saying

    Russian board or space-forum

    anyone know Russian ?
    No, but Babelfish's translation of the page seems good.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    Great Link!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,452
    Soyuz contract signed - ESA Director General and President of the French space agency CNES, signed the development contract for the Soyuz at CSG programme at ESA headquarters
    http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESA_Perm...54808BE_0.html

    The Russians seem to be one of the top players in making headway on developing the next-generation spacecraft. The Kliper program is being pursued by a group of Russian, European, Japanese partners. It aims to develop a new manned taxi that builds on the legacy of the Soyuz rather than Buran or the US space shuttle. Kourou's proximity to the equator will allow carriers to take two or three times more freight than their counterparts lifting off from the Baikonur space center in Kazakhstan

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    4,115
    If thirty years ago, someone would have predicted that Sojuz rockets will be launched from Kourou, people would have thought that those French finally fell completely for these communists :-)
    No one would have expected that it will happen because there isn't any Soviet Union any longer.
    Just yesterday I was in a Tu-144 and a Concorde.
    History is a strange beast.

    Harald

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    I wish the USSR had lasted 10 years longer--enough for some big unmanned Energiya flights to show the world what an HLLV can do.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,032

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    More at the www.astronautix.com home page--updated now after a long while.

    Kliper is to have wings.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    2,167
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Andersson
    Quote Originally Posted by Launch window
    anyone know Russian ?
    No, but Babelfish's translation of the page seems good.
    The 3rd post in that thread is in Cyrillic l33tspeak.

    I guess pseudo-nerdiness knows no international boundaries.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    728
    Quote Originally Posted by tracer
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Andersson
    Quote Originally Posted by Launch window
    anyone know Russian ?
    No, but Babelfish's translation of the page seems good.
    The 3rd post in that thread is in Cyrillic l33tspeak.

    I guess pseudo-nerdiness knows no international boundaries.
    Real nerdiness knows none either. That text says:

    SAS budet tolkat´ a nie tianut´, perevernietsia
    (SAS wll push, not pull, it will be turned over)

    marshevogo dvigatelia nie vidat´
    (there´s no engine to be seen)

    a chto u niego na nosu?
    (and what´s that on its nose?)

    Pretty tough vocabulary there but stick to babelfish which inspite of ridiculous mistakes is way better than going through the endless marshland of Russian grammar and vocabulary.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    728
    For instance

    И следовательно это не многоразовый компонент.

    is translated as: "And consequently this is reusable component" in the end of page 2, but it actually means the opposite, babelfish just forgot to translate the "nie": "And consequently this is not a reusable component".

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,452
    Quote Originally Posted by publiusr
    More at the www.astronautix.com home page--updated now after a long while.

    Kliper is to have wings.

    that's good website with a lot of info

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Andersson
    No, but Babelfish's translation of the page seems good.
    vBulletin interprets that link differently from phpBB, so it doesn't work anymore. Here's the correct one:
    Translation of russian forum

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,032
    Dr. Olsen will act as a test subject for three experiments of ESA's onboard research program.
    http://www.physorg.com/news6794.html
    is Europe soon going to space with Russia ?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,452
    Today, boosted by Russia's oil revenue, the government has committed to a 10-year plan for space exploration, funded to the tune of $1 billion a year. That's far less than the price tag for NASA's 13-year, $104 billion plan to return to the moon. But while America's space effort is struggling with safety issues and tight budgets, Russia is now seen as having the world's safest, most cost-effective human spaceflight system.
    http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9509254/
    Russia thriving again on the final frontier

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    Yep. Instead of oil companies telling Gov't what to do--it was the other way around in Russia. With gov't sponsored R-7s now privatized more and more--they have the perfect combination of state/personal funding.

    And they will still be flying in space long after the alt.space start ups go under.

  24. #24
    http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=3940

    Russia approves major aims (Klipper, Glonass, Mars)

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    I love it. Yet more proof of the fact that it was the Russians who won the space race.

    The moon landing was the biggest battle, but in terms of launch vehicles, number of launches and endurance--they won the war.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,032
    Europe keen to join Russia in new spaceship project: officials
    MOSCOW (AFP) Dec 09, 2005
    European Space Agency (ESA) officials said Friday that European countries remained interested in a Russian plan to build a new crew-carrying spaceship known as the Clipper.
    http://www.spacedaily.com/2005/05120....insvz7v2.html
    "I shall make all the efforts I can in the next few months to secure wide participation for Clipper among member states," ESA Director General Jean-Jacques Dordain said after meeting Russian space agency officials in Moscow.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    I hope so.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,032
    Russian modernized Soyuz rocket to be launched next year
    http://it.moldova.org/stiri/eng/7666/
    The first trial launch was successfully done last November. The new rocket will be launched for the Defense Ministry needs and commercial projects. It is planned to launch Soyuz 2 from Plesetsk, and its modification, Soyuz ST, from the Kourou spaceport in French Guiana, Itar-Tass reports.

    The Russian space program has been intensely focused on the multi-purpose spaceship named Clipper, which is expected to displace the veteran Russian Soyuz rockets by 2011. Meanwhile, the new performer of the program is experiencing long running difficulties in subsidy despite its popularity.
    http://www.zaman.com/?bl=national&alt=&hn=28070
    The Clipper, to be activated with the help of Rosaviacosmos, the Russian Federal Space Agency, and the European Space Agency (ESA) will be introduced in two separate models, one of which is winged. The Clipper will be sent into space installed on the nose of Onega rocket; still at the concept stage.

  30. #30
    If launched from Baikonur, the Soyuz-2 would be capable of delivering 8,500 tons into the low-Earth orbit and 2,350 kilograms toward the Moon. The Soyuz-2 could also fly from slightly upgraded launch pad in Plesetsk and from newly developed launch complex in Kourou, French Guiana. Launches from French Guiana could deliver as much as 9,000-9,200 kilograms to the low orbit.
    The first one should read "kg" instead of "tons".

    Would launch costs be as low as for Soyuz-1?

Similar Threads

  1. The Russian Hubble?
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2011-Aug-04, 11:53 PM
  2. The N1 russian rocket
    By venusROVER3 in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2006-Aug-17, 10:21 PM
  3. New Russian Shuttle?
    By Nicolas in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 2006-Mar-16, 12:42 PM
  4. Ed Lu is Russian
    By Glom in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2003-May-07, 04:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •