As seemingly usual when I start researching one thing on Google, I get derailed by something that catches my eye. This snippet from a whole post regarding Aussie Bloke contains references to April and May 2006. and I'm not sure what they are talking about. Supposedly we were all going to go bye-bye last year, but as we figured, it was a hoax. Maybe I'm missing fsomething here, but can anyone figure why the enigmatic refernced to next year> from this snippet:
"Earth will be hit around 5:30 GMT on June 20th by a Meteor."
5:30 GMT is about 10:30 A.M. PST this msg has
many links for you to investigate. The author of this glp post is
claiming to know that the worlds navies are out on the seas for one
reason only to shoot down an asteroid. These excerpts are from a
godlikeproductions post..... All what will happen is: Earth will be hit around 5:30 GMT on June 20th [2004, which obviously didnít happen] by a Meteor. 100000+ dead total. And probably with a second meteor on June 24th. If it hits, too: 250000+ dead total. And thank God less probably with a third - nasty big one - on June 27th. If this one hits: no prediction - many.The impact(s) will cause serious flooding (water impact) (and/)or earthquakes (land mass impact). This all surrounded by a worldwide storm of mini-meteors. So it́s gettin bright, dusty, and loud in a place near you.....
And all that is only the prelude for much more [expletive deleted] to come in
May 2006. Why? That́s exactly the reason why the most of programs for the balistic missile defense are tailored to be prelim. op. in September and full
op. in April 06. The whole program of BMD is not for the eight nukes of North Korea. It́s for planetary defense. Wanna more? check the programs for SM3, Patriot PAC3, LRALT, Minuteman III upgrade / VX retirment etc.
Wanna more? check the testimonial before House and Senat in 2004 for
the 2005 BMD Budget. It́s quite in there. Wanna more? Check what hit-to-kill means: You save the warhead on the missile so your missile is faster (needed for meteors) and lighter (more range). Only prob: If you take on a nuclear warhead with a Hit-to-kill missile you could produce enougth neutrons to ignite the chain reaction. Result: Hit-to-kill missiles have NOTHING
to do with Ballistic Missile Defense. Q: Why you develop and deploy
then these missiles in at least three major pograms??????
The entire thread is at: http://www.detailshere.com/asteroid.htm