Aliens on the moon

[Conspiracy Cam]

Hi.

Any body got any infomation on the aliens on the moon?

I'm considering adding an artical to my site about it, to add to my moon hoax page.

Also could you please cite your sources please.

I dont want any porkies :^o

Note: I would prefer if i could get both sides of the story.

[kucharek]

Note: I would prefer if i could get both sides of the story.

Which "both sides"? The dumb and the silly?

[Mr Gorsky]

That's easy.

One side says that there are aliens living on the moon, and the other says that that's a lot of dingo's kidneys.



I suppose the Hoax bit comes in with the mutterings of Hoagland, and others, who claim that NASA have systematically doctored Apollo's video and photographic records in order to hide the fact that they found aliens and alien structures when they landed on the moon.

The big question I would have with that is ... why would they do that? NASA is constantly talking about the potential for life on other planets and getting all excited when they find evidence of water anywhere.

If they found concrete (or crystal!) evidence of intelligent life on the moon, why on earth would they want to hide it?

[Lance]

Here's one (AS11-40-5951.jpg) before being retouched:

[Bozola]

Hi.

Any body got any infomation on the aliens on the moon?

I'm considering adding an artical to my site about it, to add to my moon hoax page.

Also could you please cite your sources please.

I dont want any porkies :^o

Note: I would prefer if i could get both sides of the story.

Well...technically, there were aliens on the moon. Neil and Buzz for a start; any human on the moon is technically an alien there.

[kleindoofy]

... Any body got any infomation on the aliens on the moon? ... I dont want any porkies :^o ...

Excuse me, but isn't that self-contradictory. #-o

[jrkeller]

Try this site. Towards the bottom.

[die Nullte]

The big question I would have with that is ... why would they do that? NASA is constantly talking about the potential for life on other planets and getting all excited when they find evidence of water anywhere.

Amidst a universe of bizarre conspiracy claims, I find this one of the oddest. The claim is sometimes made that NASA "covers up" discoveries of alien life in order to drag out the search and thereby ensure continual funding from Congress. Rather, it seems to me that the surest way to get Congress to lose interest and cut NASA's budget is to continue to find little more than rocks and gullies carved by water 2 billion years ago.

[V-GER]

Try this site as well:
http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/e...-directory.htm

and like the author says:"use caution and think carefully about accessing this evidence if you aren't prepared to risk experiencing a significant reality check." :-({|=

[sts60]

Any body got any infomation on the aliens on the moon?...

Note: I would prefer if i could get both sides of the story.

I hope you do - I'd like to hear what the aliens have to say.

[TriangleMan]

Didn't Cosmic Dave have some ramblings about aliens on the Moon?

[JayUtah]

Sure, the standard Hoaglandish nonsense plus the alleged "code" transmissions from the moon (i.e., badly-mangled, naively-interpreted excerpts from the transcripts).

Right alongside his allegations that the Apollo astronauts found aliens on the moon is his allegations that they never went at all. He's got all his bases covered. :-)

[sts60]

There's a saying that it's a mark of intelligence to be able to hold two diametrically opposed thoughts in your head at the same time.

But there's also a saying that there's an exception to every rule.

It's been so long since we've had a real Apollo HB here, though, I almost sorta miss ol' CosmicDave.

[Nicolas]

Basically, the story is very simple:

*The landing believes say the alien story is a woo woo story to give the cover up a reason with no evidence. They say we did land on the moon, but didn't release the pictures showing the alien structures.

*The woo woos say we did land on the moon, but didn't release the pictures showing the alien structures. More info, see Hoaglands Enterprise Mission.

Sorry, but there is really very little to say about this, as it is a completely wild claim without any evidence. The evidence used by Hoagland etc is the interpretation of mainly JPG artifacts as structures (he does this for mars pictures as well).

[Conspiracy Cam]

Here's one (AS11-40-5951.jpg) before being retouched:

[Conspiracy Cam]

These people so clutch at straws.

" [dramatic voice] Do you see the faint markings on the photo. I believe that this, is a ruin of a temple of a mighty and wealthy civalisation. [/dramatic voice]"

"Oh, it's not. I just spilled some tea there"


They just ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)

[Sticks]

That's easy.

The big question I would have with that is ... why would they do that? NASA is constantly talking about the potential for life on other planets and getting all excited when they find evidence of water anywhere.

If they found concrete (or crystal!) evidence of intelligent life on the moon, why on earth would they want to hide it?

According to Hoagland, in his two volume series,



there was some document that expressed the concern as to how the evidence of extra-terrestrial life might cause problems with certain religious fundamentalist groups.

I got my copy of that video from my brother in law, who bought it thinking it was a normal video on astronomy. My sister tells how she was laughing her head off at it whilst my brother in law sat in shock as to what he had actually paid for

Edited to correct picture link

[ToSeek]

That's easy.

The big question I would have with that is ... why would they do that? NASA is constantly talking about the potential for life on other planets and getting all excited when they find evidence of water anywhere.

If they found concrete (or crystal!) evidence of intelligent life on the moon, why on earth would they want to hide it?

According to Hoagland, in his two volume series, The Moon Mars connection there was some document that expressed the concern as to how the evidence of extra-terrestrial life might cause problems with certain religious fundamentalist groups.

There's a document called the Brookings Report that was written when NASA was first formed. It's a very long document covering at length the implications of civilian space exploration. There are, I think, two mentions in there that the discovery of intelligent extraterrestrial life could be upsetting to certain establishments of our civilization. The woo-woos have latched onto this as evidence that NASA would cover up any such finding, even though they're the only ones who even seem to remember the Brookings Report any more.

[jumbo]

Didn't Cosmic Dave have some ramblings about aliens on the Moon?

Yes he did. He says something along the lines of 'You can see evidence of the aliens on the moon in the photos taken by and the speech of Neil Armstrong, that was covered up to hide the aliens and the fact they didnt go to the moon anyway'! Well thats the general impression given by his site anyway

[Nicolas]

Didn't Cosmic Dave have some ramblings about aliens on the Moon?

Yes he did. He says something along the lines of 'You can see evidence of the aliens on the moon in the photos taken by and the speech of Neil Armstrong, that was covered up to hide the aliens and the fact they didnt go to the moon anyway'! Well thats the general impression given by his site anyway

\/ nananana consistency \/

[kleindoofy]

Feisty buggers them there aliens!

[PhantomWolf]

Ha, that picture isn't real. Anyone can tell it, the shadows aren't parallel. :P

[Hazzard]

This is what happens when you land to close to the "Far side".

[mickal555]

Ha, that picture isn't real. Anyone can tell it, the shadows aren't parallel. :P

and theres no stars....

And many parts seem to be levitating. :P

[Astronot]

I just want to know who took the picture?

[kucharek]

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/as15-88-11901.jpg

At least the buggers left the bible where it was. Maybe they couldn't read...

Harald

[V-GER]

Btw, that's an incredible picture, I never get used to the fact that there is a black "sky" instead of a blue one, looks so strange, but true of course.