Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Quick Question...Need Quick Answer

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557

    Quick Question...Need Quick Answer

    Would a 3-D spatial universe and a 4-D spatial universe have a different geometry?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,575

    Re: Quick Question...Need Quick Answer

    Quote Originally Posted by Platinum Rhymer
    Would a 3-D spatial universe and a 4-D spatial universe have a different geometry?
    Yes. It would be similar to the difference between Euclidian geometry and Newtonian. (2D vs. 3D)

    There is a book called "Flatland" that does a real good job of explaining 1,2,3&4D space. Try here. It is a very interesting read.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    Thanks alot, I am going to check that link out

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,039
    Do you think we could keep this in one thread? This is the third one you've started about this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    677
    cyrek reply

    PR quote
    Would a 3-D spatial universe and a 4-D spatial universe have a different geometry?

    reply
    IMHO, I would say no. Both spaces would be 3D, but 4D would add motion with the introduction of time. Time would be a 'variable point' added to the 3D dimentions.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    I meant spatial dimensions

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    I would think that they would be different

  8. #8

    Re: Quick Question...Need Quick Answer

    Quote Originally Posted by Platinum Rhymer
    Would a 3-D spatial universe and a 4-D spatial universe have a different geometry?
    Gravity would reduce by the cube of the distance instead of the square of the distance.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    But the problem with the whole inverse cube law thing is that they got the inverse cube law just by adding an additional dimension but applying the same geometry as before, wouldnt you have to do more than that? because 3D geometry and 4D geometry are different from each other

    life not being possible in 4D+ universe is just a sad sad thought

  10. #10
    Like a 2D piece of paper can exist in a 3D universe so, I would have thought could a 3D frame work exist within a 4D universe.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    But a 2D piece of paper is not really a 2D universe with laws and such, the 2D paper with 3D laws, I dont think there could be a 2D universe

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    330
    A piece of paper is a valid representation of a 2-D universe (ignore the thickness). Take a pencil and try drawing a line ABOVE the paper.
    Try a balloon for a closed universe.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    Then there certainly could not be any orbits in a 2-D universe

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Frog march
    I would have thought could a 3D frame work exist within a 4D universe.
    But the 3D frame work would certainly be upgraded

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    What would happen if you took out one spatial dimension of our universe, expect there to be radical, massive changes

  16. #16
    if you took out one of the 'rolled up' ones that they keep going on about, perhaps you wouldn't notices any difference.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,557
    Probably but there will be effects (if they do exist), but taking out a large macroscopic spatial dimension will result in a completely different universe.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    6,197

    Re: Quick Question...Need Quick Answer

    Quote Originally Posted by Platinum Rhymer
    Would a 3-D spatial universe and a 4-D spatial universe have a different geometry?
    Historical quote about 4-D space:

    “When we either apply such fancies as these, or others not less inconsistent with our innate conceptions, to space relations, we are naturally led to a geometry unlike that dealt with by common-sense geometricians. We may call the geometry to which we are thus led non-Euclidean, and it may please the fanciful to find in the cumbrous term something suggestive of scientific profundity. If we called these imaginary relations “dream -geometry,” we should be somewhat nearer the truth, for it is only in dreams that men can fancy things are and are not, at one and the same time.” Richard Proctor, 1884

Similar Threads

  1. Quick LM question
    By Jason_Roberts in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2009-Dec-14, 09:46 PM
  2. Quick question about the sun.
    By redmadman3000 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2007-Oct-27, 01:19 AM
  3. Quick question
    By Tiny in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-17, 06:08 PM
  4. Quick question
    By Tiny in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2005-Mar-28, 08:49 PM
  5. Quick question.
    By BAroxMysox in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 2004-Mar-23, 04:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •