Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Hoagland... NASA Administrator?!

  1. #1

    Hoagland... NASA Administrator?!

    On CoastToCoastAM, they were talking about Hoagland being NASA Administrator.... ACK

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    Now that's scary!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,697
    He'd cancel everything except missions to Cydonia and Europa.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  4. #4
    He has some mental issues. I'm surprised he would even consider this. He constantly thinks NASA is involved in some big coverup on Mars as well as other things. Now all of a sudden he wants to be a part of this vast conspiracy? Sounds hypocritical to me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,822
    Hoagland is a hoax merchant, this sort of thing is right up his ally. Anything to get more media coverage and web sales for his merchandise. Truth doesn't come into it - it's only $$$.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    527
    Wiping coffee off my monitor screen......

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    381

    I'm just a contrarian

    Now, now... remember your good science. Don't dismiss the odd sounding idea offhand.

    Actually, I'd support it. Then it would be put up or shut up time for Hoagie.

    And he *is* very gung ho about space and its exploration, so would he really be worse than another pencil pusher?

    He is also a good salesman, another thing NASA needs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,368
    *coughs up bite of Slim Jim*

    Houston, we have a problem...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,279
    Wait a minute, this could actually work! RCH could raise all sorts of money for NASA with his books and videos...er, I forgot, NASA deals with scientific reality. Oh well, it was a good idea while it lasted! :wink:

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    527

    Re: I'm just a contrarian

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGalaxyTrio
    Now, now... remember your good science. Don't dismiss the odd sounding idea offhand.
    Okay, I've thought about it.... Nope. Still don't like it.

    Actually, I'd support it. Then it would be put up or shut up time for Hoagie.
    I think there are better ways to get him to put up or shut up without risking the space program....

    And he *is* very gung ho about space and its exploration, so would he really be worse than another pencil pusher?
    Yes, but his understanding of how science and engineering work, well, stinks quite frankly. I have seen Star Trek prop designers with better approach to physics than him.

    He is also a good salesman, another thing NASA needs.
    Salesman is one thing, but not the only thing. You might as well hire on Kent Hovind to head the EPA while you're at it.... ](*,)

    edited to add smileys - didn't mean it to sound that harsh, Galaxy :wink:

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    Quote Originally Posted by lyford
    Wiping coffee off my monitor screen......
    At least you hit the monitor. I usually have to clean my keyboard! :roll:

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,604
    I don't think you can afford to have someone who is antagonistic toward an organization in charge of that organization. Remember when Bill Clinton would made that airforce LTC his golf caddy? yikes!

    Oh the other hand, if I was the NASA administrator I would at least consider sitting down with hoagland in an open forum and asking, "what can we do with the budget we have, and without sacrificing the science we want to do on Mars that will answer your and other people's questions?"

    In other words, if hoagie would be satisfied with a lander near cydonia, and if we could do good science there that we were going to do anyway but in another spot, then we should adjust our plans. See, on the one hand, if NASA goes out of its way to answer the woowoos, they reject it outright as fraud or move the goal post and demand more evidence. But if you involve a woowoo up front, then maybe it would be harder to do that. But actually, I know what would happen. The other woowoos would disown hoagie, saying he had sold out to NASA. Actually it might be worth doing it just for that reason alone. hehe.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    Well, as long as you are going to do this, why not make it really interesting? Say, a triumvirate of Hoagland, Nancy Lieder, and Bart Sibrel?

    Then you would certainly see some changes at NASA!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,822
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn
    Well, as long as you are going to do this, why not make it really interesting? Say, a triumvirate of Hoagland, Nancy Lieder, and Bart Sibrel?

    Then you would certainly see some changes at NASA!
    Yeah! Like changing the name to Nothing About Sane Astronomy

  15. #15
    Ahhh! My eyes! It burns.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine
    Ahhh! My eyes! It burns.
    What's that strange blob on Mars? It looks almost human! I'm a believer now! :^o

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,550
    Grrrrrrrrr.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    102
    Actually, on closer examination I realized the angle of light was tricking me into thinking a big pile of rocks represented something with actual scientific merit. :wink:

    And, the NASA I want for Xmas??? Awww, I wanted a Nazi flying saucer base in Antarctica play set!

  19. #19
    Is it just me....or is Mars interesting enough without having to create sensational stories? I hope we can keep people in charge who recognize the real mysteries we face. These are infinitely more interesting to me than anything Hoagland can dream up.

  20. #20
    From the Coast to Coast AM Hoagland segment just after that Bad Astronomer dude was on:

    Vote Richard C Hoagland for NASA Administrator

    Edit: I just noticed some bad astronomy there. It looks like the Sun is right on the limb of Mars, yet most of the portion of Mars toward the observer is illuminated. Curious.

  21. #21
    You have been ToSeeked by yours truly. (Scroll up a few posts.)

    To phrase as kindly as possible -- what I find to be the least aesthetic element is seeing the image of Hoagland's likeness in such close proximity to HST. Well, that and the fact that anyone would even consider the idea having any merit whatsoever.

    *cringe*

  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001
    From the Coast to Coast AM Hoagland segment just after that Bad Astronomer dude was on:

    Vote Richard C Hoagland for NASA Administrator

    Edit: I just noticed some bad astronomy there. It looks like the Sun is right on the limb of Mars, yet most of the portion of Mars toward the observer is illuminated. Curious.
    Well theres that... an' the Hubble being so close and some sort of nebula between mars and the sun.......

Similar Threads

  1. New NASA, New Administrator Under Obama?
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2010-Jan-28, 07:06 PM
  2. Who Will Be the Next NASA Administrator?
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2009-Jan-09, 05:40 PM
  3. NASA Administrator Set to Resign
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-11, 12:29 PM
  4. Is the NASA administrator a CIA spook?
    By ToSeek in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2005-Jul-26, 08:10 PM
  5. New NASA administrator
    By ToSeek in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2005-Mar-18, 07:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •