Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 74

Thread: Possible new human branch discovered?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,442

    Possible new human branch discovered?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,697
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  3. #3
    Note: he is holding a mouse.....










    j/k :-P

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrey
    Note: he is holding a mouse.....
    No, I think it is a some kind of marsupial.

    But if this discovery holds up, it's a really major discovery.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrey
    Note: he is holding a mouse.....
    No, I think it is a some kind of marsupial.
    Hence the "j/k :-P" at the end. :-)



    But if this discovery holds up, it's a really major discovery.
    Not really. Its just a extreamly interesting discovery. A major discovery would be that a modern population is made up of them.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,080
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrey
    Note: he is holding a mouse.....










    j/k :-P
    that got a chuckle. =D>

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrey
    Quote Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu
    But if this discovery holds up, it's a really major discovery.
    Not really. Its just a extreamly interesting discovery. A major discovery would be that a modern population is made up of them.
    Well, completely new human species that lived much later than the last Neanderthals...
    I would call that a major discovery.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrey
    Note: he is holding a mouse.....










    j/k :-P
    human dwarf species
    That would be one big rat!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu
    Well, completely new human species that lived much later than the last Neanderthals...
    I would call that a major discovery.
    marooned for eons
    I agree.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3,009
    Very interesting.

    Minor nitpick though... "Human species" is incorrect, since humans are a specific species, Homo sapiens. The word meant is probably "homonids". For all practical purposes, though, it doesn't make much of a difference.

  11. #11
    The lasting till relatively modern times is absolutely amazing. It shows how rezilient some species can be in our line without changing at all. I just do not believe its a life altering event. :-)

    They say there is evidence of Homo Erectus there too, so i wonder how they took eachother?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,526
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrey
    They say there is evidence of Homo Erectus there too, so i wonder how they took eachother?
    Considering that other one lived there 900,000 years ago and other one 18,000 years ago, I don't think they saw each other that much.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,034
    I find this new discovery amazing. I always thought that it was a shame that we historical humans missed out in knowing Neanderthals by no more than twenty-five thousand years. Now we find we have missed a breathern species by thirteen thousand years. I think that the orphan race of moderns has missed something profound. The possibility of having a family member still alive would have given us all something that we will never know.

    I grieve for our lost opportunity, just like I grieve for those individuals who are orphans today: bereft of family.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek
    A pair of pants would have been nice to have been discovered, too. 8-[

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,494
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek
    A pair of pants would have been nice to have been discovered, too. 8-[
    You can't go holdin' the lil' guys down, duuuuude. Get your repressing grasp away from me, maaaaaaan. He's free! Free like the wind! And he's not giving in to the evil of Big Pants.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,116
    I've read in my Flemish (supposed 'quality') newspaper that some scientists are even suggesting that the little buggers still were around on Flores 150 years ago, and that there may be some left on Sumatra. I can't give you a link, as it's a subscription-only website, and I only use the paper version... Anyone heard anything more of this?

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Ari Jokimaki
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrey
    They say there is evidence of Homo Erectus there too, so i wonder how they took eachother?
    Considering that other one lived there 900,000 years ago and other one 18,000 years ago, I don't think they saw each other that much.
    I don't remember but do they say how old they think the species is?

    edit. Yup: 95,000-12,000. So nevermind. For some reason i thought they lived together and this one just happened to of not died out. Shows me for skimming the article. ops: ops:

    Doh! Where can i turn in my Anthro degree, i put it to shame. :-(

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by Fram
    some scientists are even suggesting that the little buggers still were around on Flores 150 years ago, and that there may be some left on Sumatra.... Anyone heard anything more of this?
    An English author named J.R.R. Tolkien claimed in 1948 that "hobbits" were still alive, though he didn't say where. He said they are shy of the big people and have developed the art of moving quickly and quietly so that they can disappear as if by magic. Many consider him the top authority on the subject, but I think he was a woo-woo - he believed in trolls and dragons too.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Fram
    I've read in my Flemish (supposed 'quality') newspaper that some scientists are even suggesting that the little buggers still were around on Flores 150 years ago, and that there may be some left on Sumatra. I can't give you a link, as it's a subscription-only website, and I only use the paper version... Anyone heard anything more of this?
    Perhaps, copy and paste into quotes. 8-[

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Perhaps, copy and paste into quotes. 8-[
    Copyright infringement.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    2,344
    Quote Originally Posted by Fram
    I've read in my Flemish (supposed 'quality') newspaper that some scientists are even suggesting that the little buggers still were around on Flores 150 years ago, and that there may be some left on Sumatra. I can't give you a link, as it's a subscription-only website, and I only use the paper version... Anyone heard anything more of this?
    An anthropologist on NPR was saying yesterday that some of the island's current residents say that their grandparents used to tell stories about "little naked men" who lived in caves on the island. Scientists were interested in visiting those caves.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by gethen
    An anthropologist on NPR was saying yesterday that some of the island's current residents say that their grandparents used to tell stories about "little naked men" who lived in caves on the island. Scientists were interested in visiting those caves.
    I am too, now. 8-[

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquility
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Perhaps, copy and paste into quotes. 8-[
    Copyright infringement.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    7,307
    Leprechauns! 8)

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquility
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Perhaps, copy and paste into quotes. 8-[
    Copyright infringement.
    Just like my friends

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy
    Quote Originally Posted by Fram
    I've read in my Flemish (supposed 'quality') newspaper that some scientists are even suggesting that the little buggers still were around on Flores 150 years ago, and that there may be some left on Sumatra. I can't give you a link, as it's a subscription-only website, and I only use the paper version... Anyone heard anything more of this?
    Perhaps, copy and paste into quotes. 8-[
    Apart from the copyright infringement, I repeat: 'I only use the paper version'. My Windows (TM) version does not support a Ctrl-C on a paper... But it was referring to English antropologists, like gethen mentioned. Apparently they have done a search in 1995-1997 to spot the 'bushman' of Sumatra, and they have claimed to have spotted them repeatedly. But no pictures, no remains, nothing, so it's best to stay sceptic for the moment.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
    Very interesting.

    Minor nitpick though... "Human species" is incorrect, since humans are a specific species, Homo sapiens. The word meant is probably "homonids". For all practical purposes, though, it doesn't make much of a difference.
    The term "human" refers to a genus, the human genus. Although it is mostly used in reference to Homo Sapiens.

    Dictionary.com link

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    95

    Prehistoric Dwarf Bones...

    Prehistoric dwarf bones found:
    Oct. 27:
    Scientists working on a remote Indonesian island have discovered the bones of a new race of hobbit-like dwarves wiped out by a massive volcanic eruption 12-thousand years ago. How do we know these are human bones? I.E. Not alien? If it's not a homosapien, then isnt it alien? Perhaps someone can teach me more about this?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    2,770
    There are several other threads discussing this discovery. It's not really astronomy related, but...
    Quote Originally Posted by You
    How do we know these are human bones? I.E. Not alien? If it's not a homosapien, then isnt it alien?
    Is a chimpanzee an alien? What about Neanderthal man? Homo Erectus?

    If you ask me, and I'm not an anthropologist, but just a guy who follows scientific progress, these short guys just represent a branch of the human family bush that got stuck on an isolated island and adapted to conditions there. Since it was favorable for smaller creatures to survive and make more of themselves, that's what we found.

    Fred
    "For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
    -- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,992
    I agree with Nowhere Man. There's no need to use aliens to account for a new discovery.

Similar Threads

  1. What is human?
    By m74z00219 in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 2012-Jun-06, 05:16 AM
  2. How Tip of the Red Giant Branch helps determine the distances in the universe?
    By tu144 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2011-Apr-16, 07:47 PM
  3. What Branch of Astronomy are You Most Interested in?
    By Fiery Phoenix in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 2009-Oct-25, 02:09 PM
  4. [astrophysics] Will the Sun have a RGB/Horizontal Branch phase?
    By EDG in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2009-Jan-21, 09:42 AM
  5. Possible new human branch discovered?
    By banquo's_bumble_puppy in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 2005-Oct-11, 03:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •