Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Why are geological periods getting shorter?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    640

    Why are geological periods getting shorter?

    From Wikipedia:
    Name Duration (My)
    Siderian 200
    Rhyacian 250
    Orosirian 250
    Statherian 200
    Calymmian 200
    Ectasian 200
    Stenian 200
    Tonian 150
    Cryogenian 215
    Ediacaran 93
    Cambrian 53.7
    Ordovician 44.6
    Silurian 27.7
    Devonian 56.8
    Carboniferous 60.2
    Permian 48.0
    Triassic 51.4
    Jurassic 54.1
    Cretacious 80.0
    Paleogene 42.47
    Neogene 20.442
    Quartenary 2.588 so far
    One possibility might be myopia...the details blurring together in early time. But then why were durations like the Rhyacian and Orosirian made Periods instead of eras? Or advanced life might evolve faster, so that geologic time is actually speeding up. Or perhaps some thing I did not think of is shortening the durations.
    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    11,220
    I never heard of the first eight periods on your list before.
    They must have been added relatively recently.

    -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
    http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    location
    Posts
    10,183
    The farther back you go, the less we may be able to discern as a means of differentiation. As the tree of life emerged and spread out change probably took more time, or looks that way because of limitations in their ability to be fossilized. A lot of the recent stuff is probably based in other forms of data that still exist from that time, such as ice sheets. And some of it is probable about hominid relevance.
    Et tu BAUT? Quantum mutatus ab illo.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    4,530
    Yeah, it doesn't look so much like its getting shorter as there are just two different frames--the pre-cambrian, where the periods are about 200My, and since, when the periods are about a fourth of that.

  5. #5
    1.) Note that, when you get down to it, the geologic time scale is almost entirely based on biostratigraphy, not tectonic events or what the atmosphere was like, etc.
    2.) The Precambrian featured (relatively) little biological change, so the differentiation is necessarily broad.
    3.) The fossil / geologic record for older periods is poorer to begin with, which also requires a broader brush.

    Boom! The Cambrian explosion, and the beginning of the Phanerozic. Now we have:

    4.) Much more rapid faunal turnover of macroscopic organisms.
    5.) More abundant fossil evidence from terrestrial and marine environments.
    6.) Superior biostratigraphic data which leads to finer geologic divisions.
    7.) More preserved rocks, which lead to finer geologic divisions, and so on.

    In short: The periods are shorter because we're better at seeing what changed, and thus requiring finer distinction; we know a lot more about what happened over the 23 million years of the Neogene than we do over the 2 billion years of the Proterozoic.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2009-Jul-30, 04:00 PM
  2. Is an earth year getting longer / shorter?
    By hewhocaves in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 2008-Jun-04, 03:57 AM
  3. The Odds for Space Tourism - Shorter than Ever?
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Oct-12, 07:24 PM
  4. The Odds for Space Tourism - Shorter than Ever?
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2002-Apr-10, 04:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •